Parliamentary Search

Adjournment debate on Tuesday, 21 February 2012, in the House of Commons, led by Barry Gardiner. The answering member was John Penrose.

London Olympics

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on Dow Chemical's involvement in the 2012 Olympic Games.

Secondary information

Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
540 c249-58WH 
Session
2010-12
Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Proceeding contributions
Barry Gardiner | 540 c256-7WH (Link to this contribution) Since then, earlier this month, Dow Chemical lost its bid to overturn anti-trust fines totalling in ...
Speaker | 540 c256WH (Link to this contribution) I am sure that the Member leading the debate would like to hear the Minister's response as well, but...
Show all contributions (20)
Jason McCartney | 540 c256WH (Link to this contribution) On a point of order, Mr Dobbin, I would like to hear the Minister's response. A lot of questions are...
Barry Gardiner | 540 c255-6WH (Link to this contribution) No, I will not. Meredith Alexander goes on:"““And the only way to ensure that the victims' side of t...
Speaker | 540 c257WH (Link to this contribution) Minister, as I am sure you are aware, you only have two minutes.
John Penrose | 540 c257-8WH (Link to this contribution) Thank you, Mr Dobbin. I am, indeed, aware that I have only two minutes. I am very sad about that, be...
Barry Gardiner | 540 c251WH (Link to this contribution) The Minister will make the response that he wishes to make.
Barry Gardiner | 540 c251-2WH (Link to this contribution) Yes indeed. I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for his intervention. First, I will raise my conc...
Andrew Smith | 540 c251WH (Link to this contribution) I congratulate my hon. Friend on securing this important debate. His concerns are shared more widely...
John Penrose | 540 c255WH (Link to this contribution) I apologise to the hon. Gentleman if I have misunderstood him. When he was discussing sponsorship, I...
Barry Gardiner | 540 c255WH (Link to this contribution) The sponsorship was tendered under a tier 3 arrangement by LOCOG, and it was the body that awarded t...
Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park | 540 c252WH (Link to this contribution) I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on securing this important debate, and I agree with much of what h...
Barry Gardiner | 540 c252-4WH (Link to this contribution) I am delighted to have spared the time to give way to the hon. Gentleman, who makes an important obs...
John Penrose | 540 c254WH (Link to this contribution) I am conscious of the passage of time and want to make one point en passant, in case I do not have t...
John Penrose | 540 c250-1WH (Link to this contribution) To pick up on the hon. Gentleman's kind invitation, I might intervene if I am so concerned, but it i...
Barry Gardiner | 540 c250WH (Link to this contribution) I assure my hon. Friend that I will address that point later in my remarks. The sustainable sourcin...
Michael Connarty | 540 c250WH (Link to this contribution) Does my hon. Friend agree that Union Carbide is different from Union Carbide India, and that Union C...
Barry Gardiner | 540 c249-50WH (Link to this contribution) I have no declarable interests relating to the sustainability of the London Olympics, other than tha...
Barry Gardiner | 540 c254-5WH (Link to this contribution) The Minister really needs to get a much better brief because the Olympic programme contract was the ...
Subjects
Contracts for services Environment protection Procurement Sports London 2012 Organising Committee Olympic Delivery Authority Olympic Games 2012 Union Carbide Dow
Link
View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk