Skip to main content

Written question asked by Andrew Gwynne (Labour) on Tuesday, 11 October 2016, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 13 October 2016. It was answered by Sam Gyimah (Conservative) on Wednesday, 19 October 2016 on behalf of the Ministry of Justice.


Taxis: Assistance Animals

Question

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, on how many occasions a level 3 fine was issued under the provisions of section 168 of the Equality Act 2010, relating to assistance dogs in taxis, in each year since 2011.

Answer

The number of offenders found guilty and sentenced at all courts for failure to comply with a section 168 duty in relation to an assistance dog for a disabled person, with the number sentenced to a fine and the number sentenced to a Level 3 fine (the maximum available for the offence), in England and Wales, from 2011 to 2015 can be viewed in the table. These offenders were all individuals rather than companies.

Offenders sentenced at all courts for failure to comply with a Section 168 duty in relation to an assistance dog for a disabled person (1), England and Wales, 2011 to 2015 (2)(3)

Outcome

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Found guilty

-

1

1

1

8

Sentenced

-

1

1

1

8

of which

Fine

-

1

1

1

8

of which

£1000 (level 3)

-

-

-

-

-

'-' = Nil

(1) An offence under S168 Equality Act 2010

(2) The figures given in the table relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.

(3) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services - Ministry of Justice.

Ref: PQ 47973


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
47973
Session
2016-17
Subjects
Fines Taxis Assistance animals
Legislation
Equality Act 2010
Contains statistics
Yes
Link
View this Written question on www.parliament.uk