Written question asked by Emily Thornberry (Labour) on Monday, 18 July 2022, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 21 July 2022 (named day). It was answered by Edward Timpson (Conservative) on Thursday, 21 July 2022 on behalf of the Attorney General.
Asylum: Rwanda
- Question
-
To ask the Attorney General, whether her Department’s legal position in respect of challenges to the UK-Rwanda Migration Partnership in the courts is that the partnership agreement is compliant with the European Convention on Human Rights.
- Answer
-
By convention, whether the Law Officers have been asked to provide advice, and the contents of any such advice, is not disclosed outside Government.
This convention protects the Law Officers’ ability as chief legal advisers to the Government to give full and frank legal advice and provides the fullest guarantee that government business will be conducted at all times in light of thorough and candid legal advice.
As you are aware, litigation is ongoing. It is the Government’s position that the Migration and Economic Development Partnership is fully compatible with all of our domestic and international legal obligations including ECHR rights.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 38559
- Session
- 2022-23
- Subjects
- Asylum European Convention on Human Rights Rwanda
- Link
- View this Written question on www.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-01-11 10:09:37 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/commons/2022-23/38559
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/commons/2022-23/38559
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/commons/2022-23/38559