Skip to main content

Written question asked by Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Labour) on Tuesday, 12 March 2024, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 14 March 2024. It was answered by Andrew Mitchell (Conservative) on Friday, 22 March 2024 on behalf of the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.


Mali: Private Military and Security Companies

Question

To ask the Minister of State, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, what discussions he has had at international conferences with his counterparts on tackling the influence of private military security companies in Mali; and whether he has made an assessment of the potential impact of such companies on peace negotiations.

Answer

The UK consistently makes clear that groups such as the Russian proxy Wagner Group, with its proven track record of human rights abuses, exacerbate instability in fragile contexts. Whilst Private Military Companies can provide valuable security assurances, Russian Proxies have a destabilising influence in Mali where they focus on military action only and have never had a role, or any interest, in supporting meaningful peace negotiations. Long-term solutions to foster a sustainable and peaceful Mali require meaningful, inclusive dialogue. The UK supports this by coordinating with likeminded states and international organisations to address the drivers of instability. We draw on a range of available levers, including through its humanitarian, development and conflict resolution programmes.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
18251
Session
2023-24
Subjects
Peace negotiations Private military and security companies Mali
Link
View this Written question on www.parliament.uk