Written question asked by Jess Brown-Fuller (Liberal Democrat) on Thursday, 9 July 2026, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 13 July 2026. It was answered by Stephen Morgan (Labour) on Thursday, 16 July 2026 on behalf of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Fish and Meat: Origin Marking
- Question
-
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment her Department has made of the adequacy of protected geographical indication labelling on a) fresh meat and b) fresh fish packaging.
- Answer
-
Geographical indications (GIs) protect the names of products whose qualities, reputation or characteristics are linked to a particular place.
The Government has not formally assessed the adequacy of GI labelling on either fresh meat or fresh fish packaging. However, once a GI name has been protected, only genuine products can use that name and the appropriate GI logo in their labelling and advertising. We consider current GI labelling requirements to be clear to producers and informative to consumers. Where mislabelling or inadequate labelling comes to light, the Government takes steps to ensure corrective action protects producer and consumer interests.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 17625
- Session
- 2026-27
- Subjects
- Fish Meat Origin marking
- Link
- View this Written question on www.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-07-16 12:44:32 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/commons/2026-27/17625
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/commons/2026-27/17625
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/commons/2026-27/17625