Skip to main content

Written question asked by Lord Lexden (Conservative) on Thursday, 26 February 2015, in the House of Lords. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 12 March 2015. It was answered by Lord Nash (Conservative) on Wednesday, 4 March 2015 on behalf of the Department for Education.


Private Education: Vetting

Question

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to ensure that independent schools are not found to be in breach of statutory regulations as a result of the introduction of retrospective prohibition checks on teaching staff.

Answer

From 5 January 2015, the independent school standards require that schools check both existing and new teaching staff to determine whether a prohibition order or interim prohibition made by the Secretary of State exists for any member of their teaching staff.

The checks are only retrospective in the sense that schools must confirm that existing staff, as well as new appointments, are not subject to a prohibition order. The prohibition order regime began in April 2012, and the standard does not distinguish between staff appointed before or after 5 January 2015, so existing staff should be checked too. We believe that this is entirely justified. The teacher standards which form the basis of the prohibition regime apply to independent schools, and it would be invidious if a school was able to continue employing a prohibited member of staff simply because he or she was appointed before 2015. When a school is inspected, it should be able to demonstrate that it has either completed these checks (which can be done through the National College’s Easy Access system) or is well on the way to completion. If a school cannot do so, regulatory action is likely to follow.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
HL5247
Session
2014-15
Subjects
Private education Vetting Teachers
Link
View this Written question on www.parliament.uk