Oral question asked in the House of Commons, by Paul Flynn (Labour). It was answered on Tuesday, 18 September 2012 on behalf of the Ministry of Justice.
Prison Population
- Question
-
I am not grateful for that cynical, backward-looking answer, which did not recognise the fact that not one of the fresh, dynamic teams that have been welcomed to the House for the past 42 years has reduced recidivism by one iota. People are still committing crime, and the same percentage of them are returning to prison. Can we say a word of regret for the loss of one of our few civilised, vintage politicians, the right hon. and learned Member for Rushcliffe (Mr Clarke), who demonstrated that he had a working brain and that he understood the benefits of remedial work in prison? Have we not, sadly, exchanged old lace for arsenic?
- Answer
-
The hon. Gentleman can go on thinking what he likes, but as I have made absolutely clear, I also see it as a priority to ensure that this time we tackle the rehabilitation challenge, and that we stop people going back to prison again and again.
Secondary information
- Type
- Oral question
- Reference
- 550 c769
- Session
- 2012-13
- Oral question type
- 1st Supplementary
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Prisons Population
- Link
- View this Oral question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-16 12:50:27 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-09-18/12091825000078
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-09-18/12091825000078
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-09-18/12091825000078