Proceeding contribution from Andrew Murrison (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 2 February 2017. It occurred during Backbench debate on Armed Forces Covenant.
Armed Forces Covenant
I of course agree with my hon. Friend. Does he agree—I am trying to think of something nice to say about IHAT; I appreciate that that is very difficult—
that IHAT has at least the benefit of being relatively contemporaneous, unlike Operation Banner? Under Operation Banner, people are being dragged out of their beds many decades after the event and trying to work out what they were doing three or four or five decades ago. That is very difficult indeed. At least IHAT is investigating within a relatively short space of time from the alleged incidents.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 620 c1250
- Session
- 2016-17
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Armed forces Armed forces covenant
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-08-13 12:55:58 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-02-02/17020249000312
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-02-02/17020249000312
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-02-02/17020249000312