Proceeding contribution from Lord Garnier (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 20 February 2017. It occurred during Debate on bill on Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill [Lords].
Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill [Lords]
The Minister’s point is confusing. She says that the examples she gave do not provide reason to suspect. In fact, they provide reason to suspect, but it might be that that suspicion is not true. That is the distinction that the Government fail to understand.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 621 c808
- Session
- 2016-17
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Databases Armed conflict Cultural heritage Exports Protection Treaties Electronic warfare Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict
- Legislation
- Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill (HL) 2016-17
- Iraq (United Nations Sanctions) Order 2003
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2020-04-14 16:40:29 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-02-20/17022020000063
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-02-20/17022020000063
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-02-20/17022020000063