Proceeding contribution from Lord Garnier (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 20 February 2017. It occurred during Debate on bill on Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill [Lords].
Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill [Lords]
I thought, listening to all these paeans of praise, that I had wandered into the BAFTAs, but they are well placed, and I congratulate my hon. Friend the Minister. She says it is the first Bill she has conducted through this place as a Minister, and I hope it is not the last. I wish her every success.
That having been said, as we used to say, this is not simply formulaic; there is a purpose in having a Third Reading debate, albeit that such debates are now very truncated and that as I think we all agree, apart from my point of disagreement, this is a wholly uncontroversial and utterly worthwhile piece of legislation. Its genesis was several decades before my hon. Friend was even a twinkle in her parents’ eyes; sadly, I am older than the convention, but there we are. Perhaps I am a cultural object.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 621 cc813-4
- Session
- 2016-17
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Databases Armed conflict Cultural heritage Exports Protection Treaties Electronic warfare Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict
- Legislation
- Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill (HL) 2016-17
- Iraq (United Nations Sanctions) Order 2003
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2020-04-14 16:40:30 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-02-20/17022020000096
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-02-20/17022020000096
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-02-20/17022020000096