Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Garnier (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 20 February 2017. It occurred during Debate on bill on Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill [Lords].


Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill [Lords]

I thought, listening to all these paeans of praise, that I had wandered into the BAFTAs, but they are well placed, and I congratulate my hon. Friend the Minister. She says it is the first Bill she has conducted through this place as a Minister, and I hope it is not the last. I wish her every success.

That having been said, as we used to say, this is not simply formulaic; there is a purpose in having a Third Reading debate, albeit that such debates are now very truncated and that as I think we all agree, apart from my point of disagreement, this is a wholly uncontroversial and utterly worthwhile piece of legislation. Its genesis was several decades before my hon. Friend was even a twinkle in her parents’ eyes; sadly, I am older than the convention, but there we are. Perhaps I am a cultural object.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
621 cc813-4 
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Databases Armed conflict Cultural heritage Exports Protection Treaties Electronic warfare Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict
Legislation
Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill (HL) 2016-17
Iraq (United Nations Sanctions) Order 2003
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk