Proceeding contribution from Tim Loughton (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 20 February 2017. It occurred during Debate on bill on Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill [Lords].

Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill [Lords]

I appreciate that these are probing amendments, because if the hon. Gentleman were to press them to the vote, I do not think he would get much support from the people behind him. However, will he explain what he thinks is the difference between the terminology in the Bill, which is

“a person subject to UK service jurisdiction”,

and that in his amendment, which is

“a foreign national serving under the military command of the UK Armed Forces”,

because he has not answered that question yet?

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 621 c795
Session: 2016-17
Chamber / Committee: House of Commons chamber
Subjects: Databases Armed conflict Cultural heritage Exports Protection Treaties Electronic warfare Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict
Legislation: Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill (HL) 2016-17; Iraq (United Nations Sanctions) Order 2003
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk

Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill [Lords]

Secondary information

Librarians' tools