Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Burrowes (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 20 February 2017. It occurred during Debate on bill on Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill [Lords].


Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill [Lords]

My right hon. and learned Friend does himself an injustice: repetition can be a good thing, if he is right, but it might not be such a good thing if the point is overstated. I refer him to the Iraq (United Nations Sanctions) Order 2003, as well as the EU Council regulation on Syrian cultural property, where the wording is:

“had no reason to suppose”.

That is similar to the wording in the Bill, and I understand that there has been no grave injustice served on those law-abiding, prudent antique dealers who have been observing those provisions.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
621 c797 
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Databases Armed conflict Cultural heritage Exports Protection Treaties Electronic warfare Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict
Legislation
Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill (HL) 2016-17
Iraq (United Nations Sanctions) Order 2003
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk