Proceeding contribution from David Burrowes (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 20 February 2017. It occurred during Debate on bill on Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill [Lords].
Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill [Lords]
My right hon. and learned Friend does himself an injustice: repetition can be a good thing, if he is right, but it might not be such a good thing if the point is overstated. I refer him to the Iraq (United Nations Sanctions) Order 2003, as well as the EU Council regulation on Syrian cultural property, where the wording is:
“had no reason to suppose”.
That is similar to the wording in the Bill, and I understand that there has been no grave injustice served on those law-abiding, prudent antique dealers who have been observing those provisions.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 621 c797
- Session
- 2016-17
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Databases Armed conflict Cultural heritage Exports Protection Treaties Electronic warfare Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict
- Legislation
- Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill (HL) 2016-17
- Iraq (United Nations Sanctions) Order 2003
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2020-04-14 16:40:25 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-02-20/1702202000238
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-02-20/1702202000238
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-02-20/1702202000238