Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Redwood (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 9 September 2019. It occurred during Emergency debate on European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019 (Rule of Law).


European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019 (Rule of Law)

That is even more bizarre. Normally, Governments do their best negotiation and then come back and recommend it to the House of Commons. It would indeed be fatuous if we ever had a Government in this country who negotiated a deal they knew they wanted to reject. They should not waste everybody’s time and just say, “Let’s leave without a deal.”

We are wandering a little from the point of this debate, which is about the rule of law. This House of Commons should think again. This is an extremely unwise law. It undermines the Prime Minister, but, more importantly, it undermines our country. It makes it extremely unlikely that those remain-supporting MPs who could live with our exit with a variant of the withdrawal agreement will get that because they have deliberately undermined the pressure our Prime Minister may place on the EU in the negotiations he is trying to undertake. Even worse, they have invited the EU to dictate terrible terms for a few months’ extension, and why would the EU not do it? Please, Parliament, reconsider. Parliament has a duty to put through wise laws and to represent the national interest. This miserable Act is a an act of great political folly and is undermining our country in a very desperate way.

8.7 pm


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
664 c569 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Prime Minister Ministers Negotiations Rule of law Brexit UK relations with EU
Legislation
European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk