Proceeding contribution from Torsten Bell (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 21 January 2026. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HC) and Debate on bill on National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill.
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
Thank you, Ms Nokes. I will follow your advice, but will try to respond to some of the hon. Member’s points when I address the question of how we have gone about making the changes that this Bill introduces.
As I have said, change is inevitable, but it is important to take a pragmatic approach, which is my answer to the hon. Member for Torbay (Steve Darling). The Bill is pragmatic in that it continues to allow £2,000 to be salary sacrificed free of any NICs charge, ensuring that 95% of those earning £30,000 or less will be entirely unaffected. It is pragmatic in that it gives employers and the industry four years to prepare.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 779 c362
- Session
- 2024-26
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Investment Employers' contributions Economic situation Personal income Pay Workplace pensions Pension funds Tax rates and bands Small businesses
- Legislation
- National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill 2024-26
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-01-22 10:58:13 +0000
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-01-21/26012142000008
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-01-21/26012142000008
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-01-21/26012142000008