Proceeding contribution from John McDonnell (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 26 March 2026. It occurred during Backbench debate on Prison Officers: Mandatory Body Armour.
Prison Officers: Mandatory Body Armour
I declare an interest as an honorary life member of the Prison Officers Association. I also apologise as I am trying to represent my constituents in about four different debates today.
One of the issues that the POA has consistently raised is the nature of the people it is dealing with at the moment. Many prisoners have severe mental health problems. The POA says that they should not be in prison; they should be in specialist units, as should those who are drug dependent. Recently, there have been examples of the POA having tried and failed to negotiate safe practices with management. Limited action has taken place and the union has been dragged through the courts because of the ban on it being able to withdraw its members’ labour. That has to be addressed; there have to be some basic protections. As well as body armour, which I support, there has to be the protection of workers having the ability to take industrial action and negotiate a safe working place.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 783 c231WH
- Session
- 2024-26
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Prisoners Protective clothing Procurement Standards Safety Violence Prison officers
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-04-08 15:03:42 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-03-26/26032648000182
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-03-26/26032648000182
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-03-26/26032648000182