Oral question asked in the House of Commons, by Julian Smith (Conservative). It was answered on Thursday, 21 May 2026 on behalf of the Department for Business and Trade.
Opt-out Collective Actions Regime
- Question
-
As the Minister says, it is really important that the collective regime continues—we have a great reputation globally for our opt-out regime. The litigation finance industry is vital to supporting claims from consumers. The Government said last year that they would proceed with a Bill to restore a legal issue following the PACCAR judgment, so does she have an update on when that Bill will come forward? It was not in the King’s Speech.
- Answer
-
As the right hon. Gentleman knows, the PACCAR review involves complex issues, and it is important that we take the time needed to get it right. Great care is being taken to ensure that proposals for the opt-out collective actions balance the need to preserve a route to redress for consumers with ensuring a proportionate regime for business. As I said in my previous answer, officials would be happy to discuss this issue further with the right hon. Gentleman.
Secondary information
- Type
- Oral question
- Reference
- 786 c688
- Session
- 2026-27
- Oral question type
- 1st Supplementary
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Competition Public consultation Reviews Class actions
- Link
- View this Oral question on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-22 14:19:32 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-05-21/26052113000082
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-05-21/26052113000082
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-05-21/26052113000082