Proceeding contribution from Lewis Atkinson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 8 June 2026. It occurred during e-petition debate on Progression of Bills through Parliament.
Progression of Bills through Parliament
It is always a pleasure to receive an intervention from the hon. Gentleman; he is much more experienced in this place than I am. However, over 16 days of debate in the House of Lords, the will of the Lords was not tested once. There were no Divisions. If the will of the peers was so overwhelmingly against the Bill, the Lords could have divided on Second Reading if the House had wished; it chose not to.
The opponents of the Bill in the Lords went out of their way, it is suggested, to avoid Divisions. Some amendments may have passed, but a great number of others would probably have been defeated. With more than 1,200 amendments tabled, and 1% of peers tabling 60% of them, that small number of peers took up more than a third of the total speaking time.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 787 c4WH
- Session
- 2026-27
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Legislative process House of Lords Private members' bills Public bills Parliamentary procedure Parliamentary scrutiny
- Legislation
- Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-06-09 14:11:37 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-06-08/26060816000028
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-06-08/26060816000028
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-06-08/26060816000028