Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Kerslake (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 4 May 2016. It occurred during Debate on bill on Housing and Planning Bill.


Housing and Planning Bill

My Lords, perhaps I may just say a few words on that point. The amendment before you today differs in some significant aspects, which I believe do not cut across the financial prerogative of the House of Commons. In the first instance, it makes it clear that any agreement has to have the agreement of the Secretary of State. That is the additional point that the noble Lord, Lord Porter, objected to, but it makes it quite clear that both parties have to agree to this before money can be retained.

In the second leg of my amendment to the Motion, there has to be a “particular need” and it has to be demonstrated to the Secretary of State. Again, the Secretary of State has the ability—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
771 cc1447-8 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Housing Planning permission Planning
Legislation
Housing and Planning Bill 2015-16
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk