Proceeding contribution from Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 July 2016. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Investigatory Powers Bill.
Investigatory Powers Bill
My Lords, before my noble friend responds, having heard the discussion across the Chamber, I am satisfied by the explanation offered by the noble Earl. For this reason, respectfully, to be overspecific about principles that support the whole concept of privacy runs the risk of inclusio unius est exclusio alterius: that is, by being too specific, you prevent the opportunity to look at wider considerations. That may be rather a technical view to take at this stage but it also underlines the points that have made already about the general thrust of this legislation, which has innovated to an extent that would not have been thought possible even five years ago.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 774 c20
- Session
- 2016-17
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Communication Electronic surveillance Intelligence services National security Powers
- Legislation
- Investigatory Powers Bill 2015-16 to 2016-17
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2017-02-17 09:51:54 +0000
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-07-11/1607116000123
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-07-11/1607116000123
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-07-11/1607116000123