Proceeding contribution from Lord Addington (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 3 February 2026. It occurred during Debate on bill on Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill.
Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
This is fairly straightforward. There is a bit of passion being stirred up and a nice pace, so let us not delay too long. The reason I am suggesting that we include smartphones as assistance to those with special educational needs is because smartphones fit in your pocket and are a great way of carrying technology with you.
Chris McCausland, who noble Lords have probably seen on “Strictly Come Dancing”, did a lovely little programme showing all the assistance you can get if you are blind that can be loaded on to your phone. I, as a dyslexic, have good voice-operated systems that I can carry with me everywhere and use because they are on my phone. It gives you personal independence. It means that you can operate these systems, and we have only just started to scratch the surface. If there is another personal device that does it, I am all ears. I do not know whether there is another one.
You can block social media so the phone itself can be used for other purposes. It is a plastic and metal box that carries technology; it is not the devil’s passport. If we use it correctly, we can change it so that it actually supports and gives independence to a person who otherwise has it restricted from them. I ask all noble Lords in this Chamber: do we want to give independence to those who have disabilities?
This amendment would not solve everything, but it would address certain things. It would make sure that pupils could interact with lessons more easily. If they are restricted to a computer in front of them, that may well be better, but, for instance, they will not be able to take notes quite as easily—as in my case—or communicate quite as easily. The Carers Trust has been in touch to say that it does not like the proposal and would like an exemption for some of the people it is dealing with. This is moving very fast—there might be other groups.
I appreciate what the noble Baroness is trying to do but let us not be too rigid and throw the baby out with the bathwater. Technology is a way of helping to give independence, allowing people to access education. Please accept the fact that an absolute ban has downsides—downsides we can avoid. I beg to move.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 852 c1531
- Session
- 2024-26
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Assessments Data protection Curriculum Children's rights Climate change Apprentices Catering Health Further education Protection Parents Pupil exclusions Prisoners Pupils Mobile phones Political impartiality Mental health services Allergies Teaching methods Safety Schools Special educational needs Training VAT Technology Antisemitism Impact assessments Artificial intelligence Social media Adrenaline auto-injectors Assistive technology
- Legislation
- Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill 2024-26
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-02-10 11:06:16 +0000
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-02-03/2602047000054
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-02-03/2602047000054
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-02-03/2602047000054