Oral question asked in the House of Lords, by Lord Johnson of Marylebone (Conservative). It was answered on Tuesday, 24 February 2026.
Post-16 Education and Skills White Paper
- Question
-
My Lords, the lifelong learning entitlement was intended to usher in a skills revolution. But I fear that it will turn into a pea-shooter initiative unless the funding, the eligibility of which is restricted to level 4 and level 5 courses, is widened so that students can take level 7 courses. Will the Government set out what plans they have to do that?
- Answer
-
It is important that we introduce the lifelong learning entitlement in a relatively restricted way, enabling us to build for the future. The key requirements, which I was addressing yesterday, are to provide flexibility for students at levels 4, 5 and 6. Those are the first priorities that we have set for the lifelong learning entitlement.
Secondary information
- Type
- Oral question
- Reference
- 853 c474
- Session
- 2024-26
- Oral question type
- Supplementary
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Adult education Further education Lifelong education White papers Reform Training
- Legislation
- Skills and Post-16 Education Bill (HL) 2021-22
- Link
- View this Oral question on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-02-26 14:31:20 +0000
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-02-24/26022450000005
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-02-24/26022450000005
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-02-24/26022450000005