Skip to main content

1-20 of 36 results for subject:Literacy

Answering member X
Lord Adonis

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

More
Adonis, Lord (36)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords debate on motion to call attention to the Government's Children's Plan (Cm 7280) and its implications for equality of opportunity. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Baroness Massey of Darwen
Answering member
Lord Adonis
Department
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Debates
Date
8 May 2008
Reference
701 c679-721
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:What assessment they have made of organisations delivering one-to-one literacy support in primary schools; and what role these organisations will play in delivering literacy support under the personalised learning agenda.

Asked by
Baroness Sharp of Guildford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 July 2007
Reference
4969; 694 c100-1WA
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to call attention to the development of the United Kingdom's skills base. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Leitch
Answering member
Lord Adonis
Department
Department for Education and Skills
Type
Debates
Date
28 June 2007
Reference
693 c698-744
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:What assessment they have made of the use of information communication technology in schools to support children with literacy and personalised learning.

Asked by
Baroness Verma (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 June 2007
Reference
4088; 692 c247WA
House
House of Lords

Lords question for short debate on what plans they have to develop the education of young people in custody.

Lead member
Baroness Massey of Darwen
Answering member
Lord Adonis
Department
Department for Education and Skills
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
8 May 2007
Reference
691 c1337-55
House
House of Lords
My Lords, as I indicated, we have been backing it with £4.5 million, in partnership with others making £10 million for that initiative. We are looking at the results with great care. We have a spending review coming up and in that we will look at whether it is possible to take further work forward in that area. The noble Baroness is absolutely right: too few 11 year-olds are still not up to standard in reading. They start to fall behind in the very earliest days of primary school; they can largely be identified at the age of six; and they need intensive support. However, I add that if we got the teaching of reading better across all primary schools from the moment that children start in them, which is what we are seeking to do with greater attention to synthetic phonics, fewer would fall behind by the age of six in the first place.
Answered by
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
687 c957-8
House
House of Lords
My Lords, a largely positive assessment of the first year of the Every Child a Reader initiative was published on 7 November, and a copy has been placed in the Library of the House. The Government have provided the Every Child a Reader project with£4.55 million on top of the substantial additional resources available for literacy support through rising school budgets and the primary literacy strategy.
Answered by
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
687 c957
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the budgets of primary schools are rising steadily year on year. There is a national average increase of about 5 per cent in real terms in primary school budgets this year so, for the most part, the issue is not a shortage of resource for primary schools but the deployment of teachers. It is particularly vital to see that they have the properly trained teachers at the right level in the school. I do not believe that any primary school can legitimately say that an absence of resource is the reason why they teach inadequately in year 6.
Answered by
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
687 c960
House
House of Lords
My Lords, it certainly indicates that schools are falling down on the job. That has been a big historic problem with our school system; far too many children, particularly the sorts of children going on into young offender institutions whom the noble Lord mentioned, are not being properly taught in schools. I completely agree; but it is not simply the responsibility of the speech and language services to put that right. It is a basic function of every primary school in the country that its teachers should be effective at teaching children to read. If we get that right, we do not need these remedial and catch-up services later on in the system.
Answered by
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
687 c960
House
House of Lords
My Lords, speech and language services themselves are the responsibility of primary care trusts. They are a health service. Of course, a lot of professionals associated with the teaching of speech and language will in fact be part of the education service and will be located in schools.
Answered by
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
687 c959
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I do not have that precise proportion to hand, but I will write to the noble Baroness.
Answered by
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
687 c959
House
House of Lords
My Lords, we are making a very big investment in adult basic skills to meet precisely the urgent concern that the noble Baroness has rightly highlighted. That has produced a very significant decrease in the number of adults without literacy skills. Those courses in basic literacy are available free of charge to parents, many of them provided by further education colleges in partnership with schools, so it is possible to provide literacy support for the parents directly alongside support for the children.
Answered by
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
687 c958
House
House of Lords
My Lords, we believe that the early results of the Every Child a Reader programme are promising, in precisely the way that the noble Baroness set out. The track record of Reading Recovery is strong, with about 80 per cent of children who complete the programme achieving national targets a year later. The early results of the latest pilot programme that we are taking forward show an average gain of 21 months in the reading age over four to five months of teaching. However, it is a very expensive programme—it costs about £2,500 per child—and we have to weigh up the gain with the expense in terms of the other sources of funding and support available to schools directly.
Answered by
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
687 c959-60
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I am not aware of a specific evaluation that links the two—that links learning of a second language with learning of the first language—but, as the noble Baroness will be aware, it is our policy to make teaching of second languages universally available in primary schools. We have significantly increased the proportion of primary schools where a second language is now being taught and, as she will be aware, our policy is that by 2012 that should be an entitlement in all primary schools across England.
Answered by
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
687 c958
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I believe that could well be the case.
Answered by
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
687 c960
House
House of Lords
My Lords, we are not talking only about commercial phonics packages. The advice issued by my department in the primary national strategies has intensive support. For example, the Playing with Sounds handbook is available free of charge to all schools. The noble Baroness is right to say that, ultimately, it must be down to the professional judgment of the teacher, but teachers look to us for advice and guidance. We give strong advice and guidance based on best practice in the teaching of reading. Advice that we have received from Ofsted and other experts in the field points strongly to the relevance and importance of synthetic phonics as the first and fast way to teach children to read.
Answered by
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
687 c958-9
House
House of Lords
Whether the results of the 2005–06 evaluation of the Every Child a Reader initiative are yet available; and whether extra support is now being given to primary schools to help pupils catch up before the transition to secondary school.
Asked by
Baroness Sharp of Guildford (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
687 c957
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Adonis on 6 November (WA 91–2) on the skills of prisoners on reception into prisons in 2002–03, what were the skills of those prisoners on leaving prison.

Asked by
Lord Beaumont of Whitley (Green Party)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
360; 687 c107WA
House
House of Lords

What is the current population of young offenders and other prisoners assessed on reception into prison as having literacy and numeracy skills below level 1 in (a) 2003-04; (b) 2004-05; and (c) 2005-06.

Asked by
Baroness Williams of Crosby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
7995; 686 c91-2WA
House
House of Lords

How many of those serving sentences in HM Prisons in England and Wales on the nearest convenient date (a) have been assessed as having educational needs; (b) have been assessed as having, in particular, basic literacy and numeracy needs; (c) have been assessed as being unable to read; (d) have...

Asked by
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 April 2006
Reference
4662; 680 c204-5WA
House
House of Lords