Skip to main content

1-20 of 103 results for subject:Testing

Answering member X
Jonathan Aitken

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

More
Aitken, Jonathan (103)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

What is his best estimate of the total decontamination costs for Cold Meece. - Will write.

Asked by
Nick Ainger (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 1994
Reference
247 c386W;247 c387W
House
House of Commons

What have been the decontamination costs to date at Cold Meece. - Will write.

Asked by
Nick Ainger (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 1994
Reference
247 c386W;247 c387W
House
House of Commons

If he will list the gross income generated from private contractors by each of the proof and experimental establishments in each of the last five years. - Table given.

Asked by
Nick Ainger (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 1994
Reference
247 c384-6W;247 c386W
House
House of Commons

What is his best estimate of the capital costs required to facilitate the proposed transfer of small arms and cannon work from Pendine to Shoeburyness.

Asked by
Nick Ainger (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 1994
Reference
247 c385W;247 c386W
House
House of Commons

What is his best estimate of the capital costs required to facilitate the transfer of small arms and cannon work from Proof and Experimental Establishment, Pendine to Shoeburyness.

Asked by
Nick Ainger (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 1994
Reference
247 c386-7W;247 c388W
House
House of Commons

What were the capital costs incurred in facilitating the transfer of small arms and cannon work from Cold Meece to Pendine. - £858,300.

Asked by
Nick Ainger (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 1994
Reference
247 c385W;247 c385W
House
House of Commons

What was gross income generated by dynamic test tracks of Proof and Experimental Establishment, Pendine in each of the last five years; and how much of this was from (a) private contractors and (b) government organisations. - Table given.

Asked by
Nick Ainger (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 1994
Reference
247 c385-6W;247 c387W
House
House of Commons

If he will list those customers of the dynamic test bracks at Proof and Experimental Establishment, Pendine who have been consulted by his Department during the Directrate General of Test and Evaluation Study.

Asked by
Nick Ainger (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 1994
Reference
247 c385W;247 c386W
House
House of Commons
To comment on future of British nuclear test programme. -
Asked by
Alan Simpson (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
19 July 1994
Reference
247 c170-1
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Jonathan Aitken (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
19 July 1994
Reference
247 c170-1
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Jonathan Aitken (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
19 July 1994
Reference
247 c170-1
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Jonathan Aitken (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
19 July 1994
Reference
247 c171
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to 246 c82-3W, which reactors were the source of the plutonium for the test. - Military reactors at Calder Hall and Chapel Cross.

Asked by
Harry Cohen (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 1994
Reference
246 c817W
House
House of Commons

On what occasions since 1964 his Department has requested British Nuclear Fuels, or its predecessor division within the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, to co-process weapons grade plutonium from electricity board reactors along with that arising from the dedicated military reactors at Calder Hall or Chapel Cross. - No record...

Asked by
Llew Smith (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 1994
Reference
246 c817W
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to 246 c83-4W, regarding the use of plutonium from the United Kingdom in the United States of America, whether any undertaking was given by the United States Government in 1964 that plutonium produced in the United Kingdom from civil reactors would not be used in United States of America...

Asked by
Harry Cohen (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 1994
Reference
246 c817W
House
House of Commons

If he will list the trade association and invididual customers with whom his Department has had discussions on the implications at the current review of proof and experimental establishments in the United Kingdom.

Asked by
Nick Ainger (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 1994
Reference
246 c265W
House
House of Commons

What responses he has received from trade associations and individual customers following consultation on the Director General Test and Evaluation review at test and evaluation facilities.

Asked by
Nick Ainger (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 1994
Reference
246 c266W
House
House of Commons

What compensation has been paid to residents living in the vicinity of the Proof and Experimental Establishment at Shoeburyness for reasons connected with noise pollution. - Figure given.

Asked by
Nick Ainger (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 1994
Reference
246 c265W
House
House of Commons

How many complaints about noise pollution have been received over the last three years from residents in the vicinity of (a) the Proof and Experimental Establishment at Shoeburyness and (b) the Proof and Experimental Establishment at Pendine. - Table given.

Asked by
Nick Ainger (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 1994
Reference
246 c265-6W
House
House of Commons

What work has been transferred from the Proof and Experimental Establishment at Shoeburyness to the Proof and Experimental Establishment at Pendine for reasons connected with noise pollution. - None.

Asked by
Nick Ainger (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 1994
Reference
246 c265W
House
House of Commons