1-20 of 76 results for subject:Devolution
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.255 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.008 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Devolution
- We searched for
- subject_t:Devolution OR subject_ses:90891
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
What recent discussions he has with the Finance Secretary of the Scottish Government on devolution of taxes.
What recent discussions he has with the Finance Secretary of the Scottish Government on devolution of taxes.
I have had frequent and largely constructive discussions with the Scottish Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth, including on the matter of devolution of taxes, as have my ministerial colleagues. The Scottish Minister recently met the Chancellor of the Exchequer. We have made huge progress in the area of tax devolution.
I have had frequent and largely constructive discussions with the Scottish Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth, including on the matter of devolution of taxes, as have my ministerial colleagues. The Scottish Minister recently met the Chancellor of the Exchequer. We have made huge progress in the area of tax devolution.
I have had frequent and largely constructive discussions with the Scottish Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth, including on the matter of devolution of taxes, as have my ministerial colleagues. The Scottish Minister recently met the Chancellor of the Exchequer. We have made huge progress in the area of tax devolution.
What recent discussions he has with the Finance Secretary of the Scottish Government on devolution of taxes.
Yes, we have. The hon. Gentleman is right. The Smith commission—rightly, I believe—devolves power over rates and bands in the income tax system. It
does not devolve control of the tax base or the personal allowance. One of the bits of work that remains to be done is to ensure that we have a fiscal framework in place around that which means that the fact of devolution does not offer a financial advantage in and of itself either to Scotland or to the rest of the United Kingdom. I have had constructive discussions with John Swinney on that point and on many others. It is, of course, a matter for the Scottish Government to make sure that they have competent administrative machinery in place, which they will need next month when the process of the first wave of income tax devolution starts.
Yes, we have. The hon. Gentleman is right. The Smith commission—rightly, I believe—devolves power over rates and bands in the income tax system. It
does not devolve control of the tax base or the personal allowance. One of the bits of work that remains to be done is to ensure that we have a fiscal framework in place around that which means that the fact of devolution does not offer a financial advantage in and of itself either to Scotland or to the rest of the United Kingdom. I have had constructive discussions with John Swinney on that point and on many others. It is, of course, a matter for the Scottish Government to make sure that they have competent administrative machinery in place, which they will need next month when the process of the first wave of income tax devolution starts.
From reading the text of the Smith agreement, it seems to me that we have handed over income tax in particular to the Scottish Government, whereby allowances and bands can be varied. In fact, we have created the possibility of an independent tax system, apart from hanging on to the 20p tax as a kind of fulcrum around which it must work. Has the Treasury looked at the impact that there would be on the UK if there were an entirely independent tax system in the north of the United Kingdom?
Bated breath might be overstating it, but I expect the new GERS figures very soon. In recent days we have seen evidence of the damage that the Scottish National party’s ideas would do to the UK economy—higher debt for the whole of the UK at the end of this Parliament than at the beginning of it, and an extra £5 billion a year being spent on interest payments. Having been defeated on its proposals for independence, which would have undermined and damaged the Scottish economy, the SNP seems inclined to offer the same damage to the UK economy as a whole.
Bated breath might be overstating it, but I expect the new GERS figures very soon. In recent days we have seen evidence of the damage that the Scottish National party’s ideas would do to the UK economy—higher debt for the whole of the UK at the end of this Parliament than at the beginning of it, and an extra £5 billion a year being spent on interest payments. Having been defeated on its proposals for independence, which would have undermined and damaged the Scottish economy, the SNP seems inclined to offer the same damage to the UK economy as a whole.
Is my right hon. Friend, like me, waiting with bated breath for the latest Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland figures to be published? Does he expect that they will bolster or demolish the Scottish National party’s case for full fiscal autonomy?
I am confident that the resource being applied at the HMRC end of the spectrum is sufficient to ensure that we can deliver the devolution that is planned. That process is going on at present. Stamp duty devolution starts in April this year and income tax devolution the following April. As to whether or not the Scottish Government are applying sufficient resource, effort or people to make sure that the tax system will be competently administered, that is a question for them to answer. I recently signed off the orders to devolve stamp duty, and they will now need to make sure that that is done properly.
I am confident that the resource being applied at the HMRC end of the spectrum is sufficient to ensure that we can deliver the devolution that is planned. That process is going on at present. Stamp duty devolution starts in April this year and income tax devolution the following April. As to whether or not the Scottish Government are applying sufficient resource, effort or people to make sure that the tax system will be competently administered, that is a question for them to answer. I recently signed off the orders to devolve stamp duty, and they will now need to make sure that that is done properly.
Under the Scotland Act 2012, from April 2016 Scotland will indeed have significant new tax-raising powers. HMRC’s own risk register shows that the risk that Scottish taxpayers will not be identified by April 2016 has risen from amber to red, so can the Chief Secretary tell the House why, despite these being the biggest changes to Scottish tax ever, only 11 full-time equivalent HMRC staff are working on them and, according to Audit Scotland, they rely on a single official in the Scottish Government?
I am afraid that it is a feature of devolution, which the hon. Lady and I both support, that devolved Administrations have to take responsibility for matters that are in their purview. Frankly speaking, it is not for the Treasury to send officials to bail out Revenue Scotland. If it approaches us and says that it does not have enough people, it cannot do it and it is not ready, that is fine. But having discussed the matter with John Swinney and received assurances that he believes that it is in a good position to carry on taking on those functions and to do so properly, that is sufficient for me to sign the orders to hand over the powers.
I am afraid that it is a feature of devolution, which the hon. Lady and I both support, that devolved Administrations have to take responsibility for matters that are in their purview. Frankly speaking, it is not for the Treasury to send officials to bail out Revenue Scotland. If it approaches us and says that it does not have enough people, it cannot do it and it is not ready, that is fine. But having discussed the matter with John Swinney and received assurances that he believes that it is in a good position to carry on taking on those functions and to do so properly, that is sufficient for me to sign the orders to hand over the powers.
I thank the Chief Secretary for that response, although it does not entirely fill me with reassurance. Is it not the case that this whole process risks descending into absolute chaos, and is it not time that both the UK and the Scottish Governments got a grip? How many HMRC and Treasury officials have been seconded to the Scottish Government to help clear up the mess? If people have not been seconded, will he now have urgent discussions to see whether that would help?
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will provide additional resources to the devolved administrations to tackle coastal erosion.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will provide additional resources to the devolved administrations to tackle coastal erosion.
The Government has prioritised flooding and coastal erosion risk management over the course of this Parliament, and announced at Spending Round 2013 that £2.3 billion will be invested in flood and coastal erosion defences in an unprecedented 6-year programme.
Coastal erosion is an area of devolved responsibility, and as such it is for the devolved administrations to allocate funds between services according to their own priorities. The Barnett Formula was applied to departmental settlements in the normal way at the Spending Round.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much has been paid to (a) Scotland, (b) Wales and (c) Northern Ireland in the Barnett consequentials in each of the last five years.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much has been paid to (a) Scotland, (b) Wales and (c) Northern Ireland in the Barnett consequentials in each of the last five years.
I refer you to the press releases published alongside fiscal events setting out the impact for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland as a result of the Barnett formula.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what Barnett consequentials arise from the measures announced in the Autumn Statement on 3 December 2014.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what Barnett consequentials arise from the measures announced in the Autumn Statement on 3 December 2014.
As a result of announcements made at Autumn Statement 2014, following the application of the Barnett Formula to new spending allocated to UK Governments, the Devolved Administrations will receive additional allocations through to 2015-16. The figures can be found in the Territorial Offices’ Autumn Statement press releases, which are available here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/scotland-benefits-from-autumn-statement
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/stephen-crabb-the-autumn-statement-delivers-for-wales
Details of the Chancellor’s grassroots football announcement can be found here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/chancellor-opens-200-million-manchester-city-football-academy
The Barnett Consequentials for 2015-16 outlined in the press releases above include the funding for grassroots football facilities.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what discussions he has had with the Northern Ireland Executive on the devolution of corporation tax in 2014.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what discussions he has had with the Northern Ireland Executive on the devolution of corporation tax in 2014.
In 2013 the UK Government and Northern Ireland Executive signed an economic pact taking forward a constructive and positive programme of work examining the potential for devolving Corporation Tax powers to the Northern Ireland Assembly.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the effect of reductions in local government departmental expenditure limits on the block grants for Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the effect of reductions in local government departmental expenditure limits on the block grants for Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
The impacts on budget allocations to the devolved administrations following changes in UK Government departmental allocations are set out at Spending Reviews and subsequent Budgets and Autumn Statements.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the Government plans to devolve new fiscal powers to the Greater London Authority.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the Government plans to devolve new fiscal powers to the Greater London Authority.
The Government has already devolved significant powers and responsibilities to London. The Government passed responsibility for housing, economic development and the Olympic legacy to London through the Localism Act 2011, in addition to transport, planning and the police already controlled by the Mayor. The Government keeps all decisions on tax policy under review.
I could not agree more with my hon. Friend, and the Deputy Prime Minister has been championing that agenda in government for the last four and a half years. If the leaders of Leeds wish to come forward with proposals for further devolution and more power over the things he has been talking about, to ensure that we get the right economic developments in the Leeds area, we would be delighted to have those discussions in an active way, to try to settle a deal there as well.
I could not agree more with my hon. Friend, and the Deputy Prime Minister has been championing that agenda in government for the last four and a half years. If the leaders of Leeds wish to come forward with proposals for further devolution and more power over the things he has been talking about, to ensure that we get the right economic developments in the Leeds area, we would be delighted to have those discussions in an active way, to try to settle a deal there as well.
The last Labour Government cancelled the Supertram scheme in Leeds and then told the city that it could only have a bus-based solution. Does my right hon. Friend agree that as well as devo-max and “devo Manc”, we also need “devo Yorks”?
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what fiscal steps he has taken to support tourism in the devolved administrations.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what fiscal steps he has taken to support tourism in the devolved administrations.
The Government has provided significant support to the UK tourism industry, as set out in my accompanying answer.
Support for the tourism industry in devolved policy areas, including national marketing and local initiatives, is the responsibility of the Devolved Administrations.
I have not heard a definitive refusal directly from the Welsh Government, although I have heard some very disappointing comments from members of the Labour party in this House. The changes we are
proposing to make following the Silk commission, including the devolution of income tax powers to the Welsh Assembly, subject to a referendum, constitute an important package of reforms that will strengthen the accountability of the Welsh Government as well as the economic levers available to them.
I have not heard a definitive refusal directly from the Welsh Government, although I have heard some very disappointing comments from members of the Labour party in this House. The changes we are
proposing to make following the Silk commission, including the devolution of income tax powers to the Welsh Assembly, subject to a referendum, constitute an important package of reforms that will strengthen the accountability of the Welsh Government as well as the economic levers available to them.
Does the Chief Secretary agree that the Welsh Government’s refusal to take on tax- varying powers damages their economic credibility?
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what Barnett consequentials for which projects have been paid to (a) Wales, (b) Scotland and (c) Northern Ireland in each year since 2010; what such payments are currently under discussion; and what amount of such payments has been agreed to be paid in...
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what Barnett consequentials for which projects have been paid to (a) Wales, (b) Scotland and (c) Northern Ireland in each year since 2010; what such payments are currently under discussion; and what amount of such payments has been agreed to be paid in...
The following table sets out capital Barnett consequentials resulting from policy decisions taken by the UK Government since the 2010 spending round.
In addition capital allocations for 2015-16 were set out at spending round 2013. Any further Barnett consequentials, including allocations for years beyond 2015-16 will be announced in due course.
| Scotland | |||||
| £
million | |||||
| Fiscal
event | Project | 2011-12 | 2012-13 | 2013-14 | 2014-15 |
| Budget
2011 | University
Technical
Colleges | 12.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| First
Buy | 21.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Autumn
statement
2011 | Highway
Agency—additional motorway schemes (M6 J10A-13, M3 J2-3, road
pinch point
fund) | — | 1.5 | 14.0 | 21.5 |
| Additional
LA major transport
projects | — | 0.0 | 7.5 | 5.8 | |
| Highway
Agency reserve schemes (A45 tollbar and A453
widening) | — | 2.7 | 8.6 | 10.0 | |
| M1/M6
J19 junction improvement | — | 0.5 | 3.1 | 6.0 | |
| A14
J7-9 Kettering Bypass Widening | — | 0.1 | 2.3 | 6.1 | |
| A14
alleviate pressures Huntingdon—Cambridge | — | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | |
| Accelerate
M25 J13-27 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | |
| Accelerate
M1 J39-42 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | |
| New
link road to Manchester airport | — | 0.9 | 5.0 | 5.6 | |
| East-West
rail project. New rail line from Oxford to Milton
Keynes/Bedford | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.1 | |
| Rail
winter
resilience | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | |
| Tackle
local problems on the rail network more
quickly | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | |
| Electrification
of
trans-Pennine | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | |
| Station
accessibility
improvements | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | |
| Bridge
renewals | — | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.0 | |
| Regional
Growth
Fund | — | 6.0 | 33.6 | 60.4 | |
| 100
free
schools | — | 0.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | |
| Basic
need capital | — | 29.0 | 17.5 | 13.5 | |
| Housing:
Get Britain Building (loan and
equity) | — | 26.0 | 16.0 | 0.5 | |
| Housing:
Get Britain Building (expected
income) | — | 0.0 | -0.5 | -4.0 | |
| Housing:
Empty
Homes | — | 0.0 | 2.1 | 2.1 | |
| Transport | — | 6.2 | 42.0 | 65.1 | |
| Rail
Infrastructure | — | 1.2 | 1.2 | 4.8 | |
| Growth
and
Green | — | 6.0 | 33.6 | 60.4 | |
| Education | — | 29.0 | 47.5 | 43.5 | |
| Housing | — | 26.0 | 17.6 | -1.4 | |
| Budget
2012 | Get
Britain
Building | — | 9.3 | 5.7 | -1.5 |
| Autumn
statement
2012 | Empty
Homes | — | 0.0 | 2.5 | 5.0 |
| Affordable
housing | — | 0.0 | 5.0 | 17.6 | |
| First
Buy—interest
subsidy | — | 4.2 | 23.9 | 0.0 | |
| Private
Rented pump priming (financial
transactions) | — | 0.0 | 5.0 | 15.0 | |
| Public
land (NHS Trust
Acquisitions) | — | 0.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | |
| Large
scale
development | — | 0.0 | 2.8 | 6.2 | |
| Large
scale development (financial
transactions) | — | 0.0 | 4.2 | 9.3 | |
| Public
Land (Investment fund
) | — | 0.0 | 6.1 | 12.8 | |
| Accelerate
delivery of 4 road
schemes | — | 0.0 | 5.0 | 4.5 | |
| Roads
pinch point
fund | — | 0.0 | 9.5 | 17.5 | |
| HA
and LA road maintenance and
renewal | — | 0.0 | 21.7 | 11.6 | |
| Development
funding for Highways Agency
Pipeline | — | 0.0 | 1.7 | 2.5 | |
| Cycling
investment | — | 0.0 | 1.7 | 2.5 | |
| A1
enhancements (Leeming to
Barton) | — | 0.0 | 3.2 | 11.0 | |
| A1
enhancements (Lobley
Hill) | — | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.3 | |
| New
A5-M1 link
road | — | 0.0 | 2.6 | 6.8 | |
| Dualling
A30 Temple to
Carblake | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | |
| Basic
need: c.100 new free schools, academies and 18,000 school places by
expanding good schools in areas experiencing the greatest demographic
pressures | — | 0.0 | 23.2 | 59.3 | |
| Schools
Maintenance | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | 15.7 | |
| Regional
Growth Fund
4 | — | 0.0 | 4.2 | 10.5 | |
| Flood
defences: fund full pipeline, inc. making land available for
development in Leeds, Sheffield, Exeter, Derby,
Ipswich | — | 0.0 | 3.5 | 8.5 | |
| Enterprise
Zones infrastructure
funding | — | 0.0 | 2.5 | 3.4 | |
| FE
new building and
maintenance | — | 0.4 | 19.1 | 1.7 | |
| Start
up loans—funding for 2 more
years | — | 0.0 | 2.4 | 3.0 | |
| AMSCII | — | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.8 | |
| Budget
2013 | First
Buy | — | — | 96.5 | 120.0 |
| Build
to
Rent | — | — | 12.5 | 37.5 | |
| Affordable
Housing | — | — | 0.0 | 10.5 | |
| Start
up Loans (Reserve
funded) | — | — | 0.8 | 1.5 |
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will place in the Library any concordats which his Department or the public bodies for which he is responsible have with the devolved administrations.
[163157]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will place in the Library any concordats which his Department or the public bodies for which he is responsible have with the devolved administrations.
[163157]
The Memorandum of Understanding and Supplementary Agreements, agreed in September 2012, set out principles which underlie the relationship between the UK Government and the devolved Administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. These documents are available in the Library.
The Treasury in addition has agreed bilateral concordats for handling of procedural, practical or policy matters with counterparts in the devolved Administrations of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Copies of the documents are already in the Library.
We will check whether public bodies have concordats with the devolved Administrations and these, or links to them, will be placed in the House Library in due course.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish a statement of funding policy for the devolved administrations including comparability factors following his spending review statement of 26 June 2013.
[163292]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish a statement of funding policy for the devolved administrations including comparability factors following his spending review statement of 26 June 2013.
[163292]
As set out in the spending round document, full details of the comparability factors used in determining allocations can be found in the Statement of Funding Policy published in 2010.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what plans he has to devolve fiscal accountability to the National Assembly for Wales.
[161240]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what plans he has to devolve fiscal accountability to the National Assembly for Wales.
[161240]
The Government established the Commission on Devolution in Wales to consider, as part of its remit, how to increase the fiscal accountability and autonomy of the Welsh Assembly.
The Government has carefully considered the Commission's recommendations and is now in the process of finalising its response.
This is an important issue and the Government is committed to delivering the right solution for Wales.
I do agree with that. The Government established the Commission on Devolution in Wales to consider, as part of its remit, how to increase the fiscal accountability and autonomy of the Welsh Assembly Government. We are carefully considering the commission’s recommendations and we will respond in due course, having discussed the matter with the Welsh Assembly Government.
I do agree with that. The Government established the Commission on Devolution in Wales to consider, as part of its remit, how to increase the fiscal accountability and autonomy of the Welsh Assembly Government. We are carefully considering the commission’s recommendations and we will respond in due course, having discussed the matter with the Welsh Assembly Government.
Devolution is a continuing process. Does my right hon. Friend agree that if the National Assembly for Wales is to develop into a fiscally responsible governing institution, it must have responsibility for raising a significant part of its own budget?