1-20 of 186 results for subject:Roads
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 1.905 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.012 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Roads
- We searched for
- subject_t:Roads OR subject_t:Carriageways OR subject_t:Highways OR subject_t:"Public highways" OR subject_t:Streets OR subject_t:"Trunk roads" OR subject_ses:92868
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will commission research to assess how police, prosecutors and the courts respond to alleged cases of bad driving where cyclists are killed and seriously injured.[HL1624]
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will commission research to assess how police, prosecutors and the courts respond to alleged cases of bad driving where cyclists are killed and seriously injured.[HL1624]
The Government is aware of the concerns raised by some cyclist groups about this issue. We have had several discussions with stakeholders and we will be looking more closely at the data.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will review their guidance on cycle-friendly planning and design, in conjunction with local authorities and other partners, to ensure that opportunities to improve cycling conditions are incorporated wherever possible into highways, traffic, planning schemes and all planned road maintenance work.[HL1582]
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will review their guidance on cycle-friendly planning and design, in conjunction with local authorities and other partners, to ensure that opportunities to improve cycling conditions are incorporated wherever possible into highways, traffic, planning schemes and all planned road maintenance work.[HL1582]
The Department for Transport is continually reviewing whether its guidance and policy framework for cycle-friendly planning and design is fit for purpose and updates can be made if it is appropriate to do so. Current guidance for local authorities on providing for cyclists can be found in Cycle Infrastructure Design (Local Transport Note 2/08). It is available to view at:
http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/local-transport-notes/ltn-2-08.pdf
Last year we updated the guidance in Shared use routes for pedestrians and cyclists (Local Transport Note 1/12) and this can be found at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/9179/shared-use-routes-for-pedestrians-and-cyclists.pdf
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they have any plans to allocate funding for the Highways Agency to initiate a programme to improve the convenience and safety of cycle movement along and across the Agency’s road network.[HL1584]
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they have any plans to allocate funding for the Highways Agency to initiate a programme to improve the convenience and safety of cycle movement along and across the Agency’s road network.[HL1584]
In June 2012, the then Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport, the Hon Member for Hemel Hempstead (Mike Penning), met with the Agency’s Chief Executive, Graham Dalton, to discuss cycling provision across the Agency’s road network.
Following a request from the Minister to investigate cycling hot-spots, the Agency worked with Sustrans to consider one hundred locations across our network. Of these locations, the Agency and Sustrans agreed a prioritised list of twenty locations for improvement on the Agency’s network based on those which should most improve the connectivity, accessibility and safety
of cyclists. We have invested £180,000 in feasibility studies for the twenty sites and considered the affordability of potential cycling improvement schemes.
The feasibility studies have now concluded, and recommend £4.5m worth of improvement schemes, which, inter alia, will result in real benefits for cyclists and other non-motorised users. The Agency will be designing and delivering these cycling schemes over this, and in future, financial year(s).
We also intend to investigate further locations during this year in conjunction with the Cyclists’ Touring Club (CTC), Sustrans and British Cycling with a view to developing a substantial programme of improvement works for future years.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will take into account the exceptional dividend received by Macquarrie Infrastructure Group after refinancing the M6 toll road project in 2006 when negotiating with that company over its obligation to part-fund the M6 to M54 link road.[HL1437]
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will take into account the exceptional dividend received by Macquarrie Infrastructure Group after refinancing the M6 toll road project in 2006 when negotiating with that company over its obligation to part-fund the M6 to M54 link road.[HL1437]
As part of the re-financing of the M6 Toll in 2006, Midland Expressway Limited (MEL) agreed to provide a £70m contribution, index linked from the date of the agreement, towards the cost of the M6 Toll to M54 link road subject to the link road meeting certain design specifications. We fully expect this obligation to be honoured.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what has been the cost of repairing damage done to roads, railway property and to waterways by badgers in the last five years.[HL1202]
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what has been the cost of repairing damage done to roads, railway property and to waterways by badgers in the last five years.[HL1202]
The Department for Transport does not hold information on the costs of repairing damage caused by badgers on the road network, railway property or waterways.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to improve road safety in the United Kingdom.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to improve road safety in the United Kingdom.
My Lords, we are taking forward the measures set out in the Strategic Framework for Road Safety. Parliament has approved a new drug-driving offence and we will consult on the relevant limits shortly. We intend to publish a Green Paper on young
drivers later this year. Additionally, subject to parliamentary approval, we will introduce fixed penalties for careless driving such as poor lane discipline and tailgating.
My Lords, we are taking forward the measures set out in the Strategic Framework for Road Safety. Parliament has approved a new drug-driving offence and we will consult on the relevant limits shortly. We intend to publish a Green Paper on young
drivers later this year. Additionally, subject to parliamentary approval, we will introduce fixed penalties for careless driving such as poor lane discipline and tailgating.
My Lords, we are taking forward the measures set out in the Strategic Framework for Road Safety. Parliament has approved a new drug-driving offence and we will consult on the relevant limits shortly. We intend to publish a Green Paper on young
drivers later this year. Additionally, subject to parliamentary approval, we will introduce fixed penalties for careless driving such as poor lane discipline and tailgating.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to improve road safety in the United Kingdom.
My Lords, I am pleased to say that, at last, the Home Office has approved the drug testing equipment which will enable the police to move on to requiring a blood sample to be given. This is in accordance with recommendations from the North report. The Government are extremely concerned about cycle safety. We are pleased to see the increase in the amount of cycling taking place. However, the difficulty is that we are seeing an increase in the number of casualties and we do not fully understand why that should be. There is an increase because of the rise in the number of cyclists and the amount of cycling, but the increase in casualties is still too much and we are working hard on it.
My Lords, I am pleased to say that, at last, the Home Office has approved the drug testing equipment which will enable the police to move on to requiring a blood sample to be given. This is in accordance with recommendations from the North report. The Government are extremely concerned about cycle safety. We are pleased to see the increase in the amount of cycling taking place. However, the difficulty is that we are seeing an increase in the number of casualties and we do not fully understand why that should be. There is an increase because of the rise in the number of cyclists and the amount of cycling, but the increase in casualties is still too much and we are working hard on it.
I thank my noble friend for that informative Answer to a wide-ranging Question. He talked about a new drug-driving offence. Does he have any information on the approval and availability of the new testing devices? May I tempt my noble friend to comment on safety for cyclists? I declare an interest as a regular cyclist and a member of the All-Party Cycling Group. I have been knocked off my bike by a white van and have had a near-death experience with a falling 12-foot plank when cycling under scaffolding at Millbank House. In view of the fact that cycle journeys are increasing, what more can be done to improve safety and what progress has been made with the introduction of cycle superhighways?
My Lords, I do not think the noble Lord misses much at all. We have recently launched a Think Cyclist safety campaign and have made £35 million available to tackle dangerous junctions for cyclists across the country. The £35 million is part of the additional £107 million of investment in cycling that the Government have announced since February last year.
My Lords, I do not think the noble Lord misses much at all. We have recently launched a Think Cyclist safety campaign and have made £35 million available to tackle dangerous junctions for cyclists across the country. The £35 million is part of the additional £107 million of investment in cycling that the Government have announced since February last year.
My Lords, in the announcement that the Government made last week regarding the infrastructure, I could find nothing to help with the safety of cyclists. Did I miss anything or was there something in that announcement?
My Lords, as my noble friend Lord Colwyn said, this is quite a wide-ranging Question. I am afraid that I am not aware of that particular difficulty. However, I shall write to my noble friend about it.
My Lords, as my noble friend Lord Colwyn said, this is quite a wide-ranging Question. I am afraid that I am not aware of that particular difficulty. However, I shall write to my noble friend about it.
My Lords, in 2004 this House passed the Traffic Management Act, Part 6 of which was designed to enable local authorities to take action against matters such as cycling on the pavement, jumping traffic lights and all manner of moving traffic offences. That part has not been implemented by the Minister’s department. It languished under the party opposite and continues to languish now.
My Lords, the department has made it simpler for councils to put in 20 miles per hour zones and limits and to install so-called Trixi mirrors to improve the visibility of cyclists at junctions. One of the problems is that sometimes a lorry driver cannot see a cyclist. I do not think that the problems with cyclists in London involve foreign trucks. There are issues with left-hand drive trucks causing accidents, particularly on motorways, but I have not been told that they cause problems for cyclists.
My Lords, the department has made it simpler for councils to put in 20 miles per hour zones and limits and to install so-called Trixi mirrors to improve the visibility of cyclists at junctions. One of the problems is that sometimes a lorry driver cannot see a cyclist. I do not think that the problems with cyclists in London involve foreign trucks. There are issues with left-hand drive trucks causing accidents, particularly on motorways, but I have not been told that they cause problems for cyclists.
My Lords, in the light of the 10% increase in deaths and the 4% increase in serious injuries in the past year in cycle accidents, will the Government consider a 20 miles per hour limit in certain urban areas? What are the Government doing to work with border agencies on the issue of drivers coming from outside the UK whose mirrors are positioned so that they cannot see cyclists on the road? I refer in particular to the drivers of lorries coming from Europe.
My Lords, there is the Bikeability programme, the full details of which I do not have before me. The difficulty with a compulsory scheme is that it would probably have a negative effect on cycling. As the benefits of cycling are so great and far exceed the risks, we would not want to go down that route.
My Lords, there is the Bikeability programme, the full details of which I do not have before me. The difficulty with a compulsory scheme is that it would probably have a negative effect on cycling. As the benefits of cycling are so great and far exceed the risks, we would not want to go down that route.
My Lords, taking into account what has just been said about the increase in casualties, will the noble Earl take a view on the fact that, so far as I know, cyclists are the only road users who do not have to undergo any kind of compulsory test? Would it not be in the interests of all road users, but particularly cyclists, if more effort was put into ensuring that those who go on to the roads on bicycles are properly trained?
My Lords, I am afraid I do not know the answer, but I know that it is a matter of great interest to your Lordships. It is for local police forces to decide how they police cycling offences.
My Lords, I am afraid I do not know the answer, but I know that it is a matter of great interest to your Lordships. It is for local police forces to decide how they police cycling offences.
My Lords, can my noble friend tell the House how many cyclists have been prosecuted in the past year for going through red lights, for ignoring pedestrian crossings and for exceeding the speed limit?
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is (1) the estimated cost, and (2) the length, of each of the 18 road schemes announced in October 2010. [HL702]
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is (1) the estimated cost, and (2) the length, of each of the 18 road schemes announced in October 2010. [HL702]
The table below gives the estimated cost and the length of the 18 road schemes announced in October 2010 for which we stated that we would continue work on these schemes for potential future construction.
| Scheme
Name | Approved
Range
Estimate | Scheme
Length | ||
| Min
(£m) | Max
(£m) | Km | Miles | |
| A453
Widening | 138 | 167 | 11.5 | 7.1 |
| A45/A46
Tollbar End
Improvement | 109 | 150 | 3.0 | 1.9 |
| M1
J19/M6
Improvement | 185 | 273 | Jct | Jct |
| A14
Kettering
Bypass | 80 | 107 | 4.6 | 2.9 |
| M6
J10a-13 | 140 | 201 | 15.4 | 9.6 |
| M3
J2-4a
* | 134 | 183 | 21.6 | 13.4 |
| A5/M1
Link | 134 | 189 | 4.5 | 2.8 |
| M25
J30
Improvement | n/a | n/a | Jct | Jct |
| M4
J3-12
* | 525 | 720 | 51.2 | 31.8 |
| A21
Tonbridge to
Pembury | 94 | 119 | 4.1 | 2.5 |
| A160/A180
Immingham | 89 | 132 | Jct | Jct |
| A19/A1058
Coast
Road | 113 | 166 | Jct | Jct |
| A63
Castle
Street | 129 | 192 | 1.5 | 0.9 |
| A27
Chichester
Bypass | n/a | n/a | 5.5 | 3.4 |
| A19
Testos | n/a | n/a | Jct | Jct |
| A38
Derby
Junctions | n/a | n/a | Jct | Jct |
| M20
J10a
* | 66 | 98 | Jct | Jct |
| M54
to M6/M6 Toll
* | n/a | n/a | 3.5 | 2.2 |
The table includes the 14 schemes listed in paragraph 26 of the October 2010 “Investment in Highways Transport Schemes” announcement and the 4 ‘review’ schemes (highlighted by an *) listed in paragraph 27.
Schemes with a range estimate which are referenced by an n/a indicates that the range estimate is not available. These schemes are early in the life cycle where a number of options are still under consideration covering a wide range of potential costs. Once the preferred options have been selected, estimates will be confirmed for each.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how much of the funding allocated to the Highways Agency and local authorities for maintenance of the motorway and trunk road network and highways has been subsequently awarded to the City of Liverpool in each of the last five years; and to what purpose. [HL688]
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how much of the funding allocated to the Highways Agency and local authorities for maintenance of the motorway and trunk road network and highways has been subsequently awarded to the City of Liverpool in each of the last five years; and to what purpose. [HL688]
Funding allocated to the Highways Agency for maintenance of the motorway and trunk road network is not allocated to the City of Liverpool or any other local highway authority.
A breakdown of the capital funding grant allocated to the City of Liverpool for highways maintenance, including top-up funding, over the last five years is as follows:
| Financial
Year | Amount
£million |
| 2009-10
Highways Maintenance Capital Block Grant Funding (see note
1). | 3.378 |
| 2010-11
Highways Maintenance Capital Block Grant Funding (see note
1) | 3.885 |
| May
2010 – Additional Funding provided for pothole
damage | 0.381 |
| March
2011 – Additional Funding provided for pothole
damage | 1.058 |
| 2011-12
Highways Maintenance Capital Block Grant Funding (see note
1) | 3.825 |
| 2012-13
Highways Maintenance Capital Block Grant Funding (see note
1) | 3.571 |
| 2013-14
Highways Maintenance Capital Block Grant Funding | 3.271 |
| 2013-14
Additional Highways Maintenance Funding announced in December
2012 | 0.596 |
Note:
1) These are indicative funding allocations and final allocations to the City of Liverpool were subject to distribution arrangements undertaken by the Merseyside Joint Authority/Integrated Transport Authority.
Local authorities are also able to use revenue funding allocated by the Department for Communities and Local Government through the Revenue Support Grant for maintaining their local highways.
Neither capital nor revenue highways maintenance funding is ring-fenced and it is for local highway authorities to decide upon their spending priorities across the whole range of services they provide.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what were the costs of upgrading bridge structures as a result of the increase in maximum weight limits for heavy goods vehicles from 32.5 tonnes to 38 tonnes, 40 tonnes and 44 tonnes on (1) the strategic road network, and (2) local authority managed roads....
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what were the costs of upgrading bridge structures as a result of the increase in maximum weight limits for heavy goods vehicles from 32.5 tonnes to 38 tonnes, 40 tonnes and 44 tonnes on (1) the strategic road network, and (2) local authority managed roads....
The Highways Agency is responsible for motorways and trunk roads in England, and has reviewed its costs associated with increased vehicle weights, in compliance with European Union legislation. For older bridges there has been a large programme of structural assessment followed by strengthening of
bridges where necessary. Total costs to date are £777 million overall and there is an additional allowance of £19.5 million for future costs. The funding has not been split between different vehicle weight changes.
The management of the local road network in England, including maintenance of its bridges, is the responsibility of local highway authorities. The Government allocate capital block grant funding to local highway authorities in England (outside London) for highways maintenance which can be used for maintaining road bridges to the higher weight bearing standard where they deem it necessary. Therefore the costs of local highway authorities in strengthening bridges are not collated centrally.
The Department for Transport has previously funded a national bridge assessment and strengthening programme. This programme was for all bridges that met certain criteria including having a span greater than 1.5 metres as well as being on the primary route network. It is estimated that since 2001 approximately £150 million has been provided to local authorities in England outside London to strengthen bridges on these routes as part of this programme.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of whether the re-introduction of single/double summer time will reduce road deaths; and whether they will publish the road casualty statistics, including date and time, from the 1968-71 daylight saving experiment to inform debate on the matter.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of whether the re-introduction of single/double summer time will reduce road deaths; and whether they will publish the road casualty statistics, including date and time, from the 1968-71 daylight saving experiment to inform debate on the matter.
My Lords, we estimate that 54 deaths and 185 serious casualties would be avoided annually across Great Britain if single/double summer time were adopted. However, this would have a much wider effect on the economy and society, which must also be taken into account. The Department for Transport does not hold road casualty statistics from before 1979. Officials are investigating whether other organisations hold the statistics. If they can be obtained, I will make them available.
My Lords, we estimate that 54 deaths and 185 serious casualties would be avoided annually across Great Britain if single/double summer time were adopted. However, this would have a much wider effect on the economy and society, which must also be taken into account. The Department for Transport does not hold road casualty statistics from before 1979. Officials are investigating whether other organisations hold the statistics. If they can be obtained, I will make them available.
My Lords, we estimate that 54 deaths and 185 serious casualties would be avoided annually across Great Britain if single/double summer time were adopted. However, this would have a much wider effect on the economy and society, which must also be taken into account. The Department for Transport does not hold road casualty statistics from before 1979. Officials are investigating whether other organisations hold the statistics. If they can be obtained, I will make them available.
My Lords, the department’s admission that there would be casualty savings is not new, but the available savings for each year as we reduce the overall number of casualties are only approximately one-third of the annual reduction in casualties that we expect. I would be delighted to have a debate in your Lordships’ House, but of course that is a matter for the usual channels.
My Lords, the department’s admission that there would be casualty savings is not new, but the available savings for each year as we reduce the overall number of casualties are only approximately one-third of the annual reduction in casualties that we expect. I would be delighted to have a debate in your Lordships’ House, but of course that is a matter for the usual channels.
If I heard the noble Earl correctly, it is very encouraging that the Department for Transport now recognises the connection between daylight saving and a reduction in accidents. Indeed, the statistics seem to prove that. Is the noble Earl aware that it is 45 years since 1968 and that 40 transient Transport Ministers have taken on the job since then? The Minister seems to be the first one who has seen this connection. Will he therefore consider having a debate to deal with the full implications of daylight saving and give an undertaking that, whatever happens with Scotland over independence or any concessions given to it, the time in Scotland will remain the same as south of the border?
My Lords, I look forward with bated breath when the noble Lord stands to see whether he will ask about something else. One has to be persistent, but whether the noble Lord will achieve his desired outcome I cannot say.
My Lords, I look forward with bated breath when the noble Lord stands to see whether he will ask about something else. One has to be persistent, but whether the noble Lord will achieve his desired outcome I cannot say.
Will my noble friend congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Tanlaw, in asking this question over more than 30 years? I have heard him do so many times.