Lords committee stage fifth day. Clause 44 agreed to. Clause 45, as amended, agreed to. Clause 46 agreed to. Schedule 8 agreed to. Clauses 47 and 48 agreed to. Clause 49, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 50 and 51 agreed to. Schedule 9, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 52 to 95 agreed to. Clause 96, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 97 to 102 agreed to. Clause 103, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 104 to 108 agreed to. New clause agreed to.

Lords committee stage fifth day. Clause 44 agreed to. Clause 45, as amended, agreed to. Clause 46 agreed to. Schedule 8 agreed to. Clauses 47 and 48 agreed to. Clause 49, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 50 and 51 agreed to. Schedule 9, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 52 to...

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

What government authority is responsible for (a) scrutinising, and (b) investigating the propriety and trustworthiness of the staff of the Home Office Immigration and Nationality Directorate.

What government authority is responsible for (a) scrutinising, and (b) investigating the propriety and trustworthiness of the staff of the Home Office Immigration and Nationality Directorate.

What action has been taken against staff who have perpetrated acts of unlawful discrimination while in the employment of the Civil Service.

What action has been taken against staff who have perpetrated acts of unlawful discrimination while in the employment of the Civil Service.

What plans they have to implement the recommendation of the Committee on Standards in Public Life that most of the complaints made to the Standards Board for England should be handled locally by the relevant local authorities rather than nationally by the board.

What plans they have to implement the recommendation of the Committee on Standards in Public Life that most of the complaints made to the Standards Board for England should be handled locally by the relevant local authorities rather than nationally by the board.

On how many occasions during the past two years for which figures are available complaints have been made to the Committee on Standards in Public Life which may be classified as vexations, trivial or politically motivated, or have already been investigated by other bodies such as the Local Government Ombudsman...

On how many occasions during the past two years for which figures are available complaints have been made to the Committee on Standards in Public Life which may be classified as vexations, trivial or politically motivated, or have already been investigated by other bodies such as the Local Government Ombudsman...

Parliamentary Commissioner (Amendment) Bill (HL). Lords second reading debate. Agreed to on question and committed to a Committee of the whole House.

Parliamentary Commissioner (Amendment) Bill (HL). Lords second reading debate. Agreed to on question and committed to a Committee of the whole House.

Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967 (Amendment) Bill (HL). Lords second reading debate. Agreed to on question and committed to a committee of the Whole House (HL).

Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967 (Amendment) Bill (HL). Lords second reading debate. Agreed to on question and committed to a committee of the Whole House (HL).

How the annual number of complaints received by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration compares with the annual number of complaints received by parliamentary ombudsmen in other European and Commonwealth countries, taking into account population sizes in those countries [HL 2181] and further to the Written Answer by the Lord Bassam...

How the annual number of complaints received by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration compares with the annual number of complaints received by parliamentary ombudsmen in other European and Commonwealth countries, taking into account population sizes in those countries [HL 2181] and further to the Written Answer by the Lord Bassam...

Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Bassam of Brighton on 17 March (WA 55), whether they have identified any objections in principle to the creation of a right of direct access by members of the public to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration for complaints of maladministration by government...

Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Bassam of Brighton on 17 March (WA 55), whether they have identified any objections in principle to the creation of a right of direct access by members of the public to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration for complaints of maladministration by government...

Whether they intend to introduce legislation to enable the public to have a right of direct access to the Parliamentary Ombudsman for complaints of maladministration. [HL 1620]. - Inc ref to CH 418 c1379-80, 9 March 2004.

Whether they intend to introduce legislation to enable the public to have a right of direct access to the Parliamentary Ombudsman for complaints of maladministration. [HL 1620]. - Inc ref to CH 418 c1379-80, 9 March 2004.

What were the terms of reference of the inquiry which the Prisons Ombudsman was asked to conduct on the board of visitors at HM Prison Standford Hill; and what recommendations he made. [HL 1843].

What were the terms of reference of the inquiry which the Prisons Ombudsman was asked to conduct on the board of visitors at HM Prison Standford Hill; and what recommendations he made. [HL 1843].

What is the timetable for setting up the new independent Police Complaints Commission. [HL 1241].

What is the timetable for setting up the new independent Police Complaints Commission. [HL 1241].

Statement on when they will announce the proposals for a new system for dealing with complaints against the police. [HL 196]. - Inc fact that publishing a framework of a new system, copies in Library.

Statement on when they will announce the proposals for a new system for dealing with complaints against the police. [HL 196]. - Inc fact that publishing a framework of a new system, copies in Library.

Whether they will extend the remit of the Immigration Service Complaints Unit to cover detention decisions themselves; and whether they will appoint an independent authority to consider those complaints.

Whether they will extend the remit of the Immigration Service Complaints Unit to cover detention decisions themselves; and whether they will appoint an independent authority to consider those complaints.