1-2 of 2 results for subject:Forgery
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.23 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Forgery
- We searched for
- subject_t:Forgery OR subject_ses:91337
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department with reference to EU Council Decision 2005/511/JHA on protecting the euro against counterfeiting, what assessment she has made of the likely benefit to the UK of the designation of Europol as the central office for combating euro counterfeiting.
[108240]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department with reference to EU Council Decision 2005/511/JHA on protecting the euro against counterfeiting, what assessment she has made of the likely benefit to the UK of the designation of Europol as the central office for combating euro counterfeiting.
[108240]
[holding answer 21 May 2012]: The UK must decide, no later than 31 May 2014, whether to accept full European Court of Justice jurisdiction over those EU police and criminal justice measures adopted before 1 December 2009 which have not been amended or replaced. This measure falls within the scope of that decision and will be reviewed accordingly.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people were convicted for offences related to counterfeiting coins in each year since 1997.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people were convicted for offences related to counterfeiting coins in each year since 1997.
| Number of persons convicted at all courts for offences relating to counterfeiting coins in England and Wales, 1997 to 2008¹, ², ³, 4 | |
|---|---|
| Found guilty | |
| 1997 | 14 |
| 1998 | 17 |
| 1999 | 18 |
| 2000 | 19 |
| 2001 | 15 |
| 2002 | 11 |
| 2003 | 6 |
| 2004 | 11 |
| 2005 | 14 |
| 2006 | 13 |
| 2007 | 30 |
| 2008 | 13 |
| ¹ The figures given in the table relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe. ² Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. ³ Excludes data for Cardiff magistrates court for April, July, and August 2008. 4 Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981 S.14 Offence description: "Making counterfeit coin or note". Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services—Ministry of Justice. |