1-13 of 13 results for subject:Cancer
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.231 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.018 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Cancer
- We searched for
- subject_t:Cancer OR subject_t:Oncology OR subject_t:Sarcoma OR subject_ses:8937
Answering member
X
Liam Byrne
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
More
Byrne, Liam (13)
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Welfare Reform Bill. Second reading debate. Amendment negatived on division (244 votes to 317). Second reading agreed to on division (308 votes to 20). Programme motion on proceedings in Public Bill Committee, on Report, Third Reading and any other proceedings, agreed to on question. Queen's recommendation signified. Money resolution agreed to on question. [Relevant documents: The oral evidence taken on 26 January and 9 February 2011 by the Work and Pensions Committee on the White Paper on Universal Credit, and the written evidence received, HC 743.]
Welfare Reform Bill. Second reading debate. Amendment negatived on division (244 votes to 317). Second reading agreed to on division (308 votes to 20). Programme motion on proceedings in Public Bill Committee, on Report, Third Reading and any other proceedings, agreed to on question. Queen's recommendation signified. Money resolution agreed...
Lead member
Iain Duncan Smith
Answering member
Liam Byrne
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on bills
Legislative stage
Second reading
Procedure
Programme motions; Money resolutions; Reasoned amendments; Queen's recommendation
Legislation
Welfare Reform Bill 2010-12
Subjects
Disability; Disability living allowance; Care homes; Childcare; Disadvantaged; Cancer; Capital rules; Housing benefit; Employment; Eligibility; Incapacity benefit; Medical examinations; Maintenance; Low incomes; Private rented housing; Lone parents; Universal credit; Reform; Social security benefits; Social security; Social Fund; Self-employed; Sanctions; Uprating; Employment and support allowance; Personal independence payment
Date
9 March 2011
Reference
524 c919-1029
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients normally resident in Hull North have been treated for cancer in the past 12 months.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients normally resident in Hull North have been treated for cancer in the past 12 months.
Asked by
Diana Johnson
(Labour)
Answered by
Liam Byrne
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
19 April 2006
For answer on
24 April 2006
Answered on
2 May 2006
The information requested is shown in the table.
| Count of finished consultant episodes and patients for selected primary care trusts (PCTs) of residence where the primary diagnosis is cancer in national health service hospitals, England 2004–05 | ||
|---|---|---|
| PCT of residence | Finished consultant episodes | Patient counts |
| Eastern Hull | 3,151 | 1,600 |
| West Hull | 4,204 | 1,829 |
| Notes: Finished consultant episode (FCE) A FCE is defined as a period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one health care provider. Please note that the figures do not represent the number of patients, as a person may have more than one episode of care within the year. Patient counts Patient counts are based on the unique patient identifier called the hospital episode statistics identifier (HESID). This identifier is derived based on patient's date of birth, postcode, sex, local patient identifier and NHS number, using an agreed algorithm. Where data is incomplete, HESID might erroneously link episodes or fail to recognise episodes for the same patient. Care is therefore needed, especially where duplicate records persist in the data. The patient count cannot be summed across a table where patients may have episodes in more than one cell. Diagnosis (primary diagnosis) The primary diagnosis is the first of up to 14 (seven prior to 2002–03) diagnosis fields in the HES data set and provides the main reason why the patient was in hospital. PCT and strategic health authority (SHA) data quality PCT and SHA data was added to historic data-years in the HES database using 2002–03 boundaries, as a one-off exercise in 2004. The quality of the data on PCT of treatment and SHA of treatment is poor in 1996–97, 1997–98 and 1998–99, with over a third of all finished episodes having missing values in these years. Data quality of PCT of general practice (GP) practice and SHA of GP practice in 1997–98 and 1998–99 is also poor, with a high proportion missing values where practices changed or ceased to exist. There is less change in completeness of the residence-based fields over time, where the majority of unknown values are due to missing postcodes on birth episodes. Users of time series analysis including these years need to be aware of these issues in their interpretation of the data. Ungrossed data Figures have not been adjusted for shortfalls in data that is the data is ungrossed. Source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre. |
Subjects
Cancer; Kingston upon Hull
Date
2 May 2006
Reference
65464; 445 c1531-2W;445 c1531-2W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much has been spent in improving cancer services in York since 1997.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much has been spent in improving cancer services in York since 1997.
Asked by
Hugh Bayley
(Labour)
Answered by
Liam Byrne
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
12 April 2006
For answer on
24 April 2006
Answered on
24 April 2006
The information requested is not held centrally. Local health economies are responsible for determining how to use their resources to meet the health needs of their local population, including investment in cancer services. An exercise to track additional cancer investment carried out in 2005 showed that in 2003–04 there was new investment in cancer services across the Yorkshire cancer network of £2.669 million.
Subjects
Cancer; York
Date
24 April 2006
Reference
64336; 445 c953W;445 c953W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many specialist cancer (a) doctors and (b) nurses were employed by the NHS in York in (i) 1997 and (ii) in the latest year for which figures are available.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many specialist cancer (a) doctors and (b) nurses were employed by the NHS in York in (i) 1997 and (ii) in the latest year for which figures are available.
Asked by
Hugh Bayley
(Labour)
Answered by
Liam Byrne
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
12 April 2006
For answer on
24 April 2006
Answered on
24 April 2006
The information requested is shown in the table.
| Hospital, Public Health Medicine and Community Health Services (HCHS): Doctors working within the six main cancer specialties in North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire strategic health authority England at 30 September each year Number (headcount)(38) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | 2004 | ||
| England | 5,180 | 7,597 | |
| of which: | |||
| North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire | Q11 | 90 | 173 |
| of which: | |||
| York Hospitals National Health Service Trust | RGB | 19 | 27 |
| Selby and York Primary Care Trust | 5E2 | 0 | 2 |
| Source: NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre—medical and dental workforce census | |||
| (38)Doctors includes (among others) consultants, non-consultant career grades and doctors in training and equivalents. |
Subjects
Cancer; York
Date
24 April 2006
Reference
64338; 445 c953W;445 c953W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average waiting time was from diagnosis to first treatment for people from York diagnosed with (a) breast and (b) all cancers in (i) 1997 and (ii) on the latest date for which figures are available.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average waiting time was from diagnosis to first treatment for people from York diagnosed with (a) breast and (b) all cancers in (i) 1997 and (ii) on the latest date for which figures are available.
Asked by
Hugh Bayley
(Labour)
Answered by
Liam Byrne
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
12 April 2006
For answer on
24 April 2006
Answered on
24 April 2006
Average waiting times for the treatment of cancer patients are not collected centrally. A cancer waiting times standard of a maximum wait of 31 days from diagnosis to first cancer treatment was introduced for breast cancer from December 2001 and for all cancer patients from December 2005. Data for York Hospitals National Health Service Trust show that in the last quarter, October to December 2005, 100 per cent. of women with breast cancer and 97.2 per cent. of all cancer patients were treated within this standard. Data on cancer waiting times was not collected centrally in 1997.
Subjects
Cancer; York
Date
24 April 2006
Reference
64335; 445 c953W;445 c953W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients normally resident in West Lancashire have been treated for cancer in the past 12 months.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients normally resident in West Lancashire have been treated for cancer in the past 12 months.
Asked by
Rosie Cooper
(Labour)
Answered by
Liam Byrne
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
15 February 2006
For answer on
27 February 2006
Answered on
8 March 2006
The information is not available in the format requested. However, the following table shows the data for 2004–05.
| All diagnoses count of finished consultant episodes and patients for cancer in the West Lancashire Primary Care Trust 2004–05 | |
|---|---|
| Finished consultant episodes | Patient counts |
| 2,588 | 1,215 |
| Notes: Finished consultant episode (FCE): 1. An FCE is defined as a period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one health care provider. Please note that the figures do not represent the number of patients, as a person may have more than one episode of care within the year. All diagnoses count of episodes: 2. These figures represent a count of all FCE's where the diagnosis was mentioned in any of the 14 (seven prior to 2002–03) diagnosis fields in a hospital episode statistics (HES) record. Diagnosis (primary diagnosis): 3. The primary diagnosis is the first of up to 14 (seven prior to 2002–03) diagnosis fields in the HES data set and provides the main reason why the patient was in hospital. Secondary diagnoses: 4. As well as the primary diagnosis, there are up to 13 (six prior to 2002–03) secondary diagnosis fields in HES that show other diagnoses relevant to the episode of care. Patient counts: 5. Patient counts are based on the unique patient identifier HES identification (HESID). This identifier is derived based on patient's date of birth, postcode, sex, local patient identifier and national health service number, using an agreed algorithm. Where data are incomplete, HESID might erroneously link episodes or fail to recognise episodes for the same patient. Care is therefore needed, especially where duplicate records persist in the data. The patient count cannot be summed across a table where patients may have episodes in more than one cell. Ungrossed data: 6. Figures have not been adjusted for shortfalls in data, that is the data is ungrossed. Source: Hospital Episode Statistics, NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre |
Subjects
Cancer; Lancashire
Date
8 March 2006
Reference
443 c1609-10W;443 c1609-10W; 53397
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what measures she is taking to increase the numbers of Macmillan nurses working for the NHS in West Lancashire.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what measures she is taking to increase the numbers of Macmillan nurses working for the NHS in West Lancashire.
Asked by
Rosie Cooper
(Labour)
Answered by
Liam Byrne
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
15 February 2006
For answer on
27 February 2006
Answered on
8 March 2006
It is for the national health service trusts to decide how many nurses including palliative care nurse specialists, are employed in each specialty within hospitals. Local cancer networks work in partnership with primary care trusts, strategic health authorities and their work force development directorates to assess, plan and review their work force, education and training needs for all staff linked to the delivery of local and national priorities for cancer.
Subjects
Cancer; NHS; Nurses; Palliative care; Lancashire
Date
8 March 2006
Reference
53398; 443 c1621W;443 c1621W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients normally resident in Lancashire have been treated for cancer in Lancashire in the past 12months.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients normally resident in Lancashire have been treated for cancer in Lancashire in the past 12months.
Asked by
Nigel Evans
(Conservative)
Answered by
Liam Byrne
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
2 February 2006
For answer on
6 February 2006
Answered on
27 February 2006
The information is not available in the format requested. However, the table shows the numbers of patients who reside in the Cumbria and Lancashire Strategic Health Authority area who were treated for cancer at hospitals based in the area.
| All diagnosis count of finished consultant episodes and patients for cancer by selected providers of treatment strategic health authority of residence is Cumbria and Lancashire National Health Service Hospitals, England 2004–05 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Provider of treatment | Finished consultant episodes | Patient counts |
| North Cumbria Acute Hospitals NHS Trust | 8,513 | 3,567 |
| Morecambe Bay Hospitals NHS Trust | 7,897 | 4,575 |
| Southport and Ormskirk NHS Trust | 1,400 | 906 |
| Blackpool, Fylde And Wyre Hospitals NHS Trust | 12,500 | 4,003 |
| Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust | 9,220 | 5,739 |
| East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust | 11,359 | 5,053 |
| Total finished consultant episodes | 50,889 | n/a |
| Total unique patients | — | 23,410 |
| Notes: 1.Finished consultant episode (FCE) An FCE is defined as a period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. Please note that the figures do not represent the number of patients, as a person may have more than one episode of care within the year. 2.All diagnoses count of episodes These figures represent a count of all FCE's where the diagnosis was mentioned in any of the 14 (seven prior to 2002–03) diagnosis fields in a hospital episode statistics (HES) record. 3.Diagnosis (primary diagnosis) The primary diagnosis is the first of up to 14 (seven prior to 2002–03) diagnosis fields in the HES data set and provides the main reason why the patient was in hospital. 4.Secondary diagnosis As well as the primary diagnosis, there are up to 13 (six prior to 2002–03) secondary diagnosis fields in HES that show other diagnoses relevant to the episode of care. 5.Patient counts Patients counts are based on the unique patient identifier HES identification (HESID). This identifier is derived based on patient's date of birth, postcode, sex, local patient identifier and NHS number, using an agreed algorithm. Where data are incomplete, HESID might erroneously link episodes or fail to recognise episodes for the same patient. Care is therefore needed, especially where duplicate records persist in the data. The patient count cannot be summed across a table where patients may have episodes in more than one cell. |
Subjects
Cancer; Hospitals; NHS; Medical treatments; Patients; Lancashire
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
49794; 443 c417-8W;443 c417-8W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps are taken to monitor access to cancer treatments for patients in (a) the North East and (b) Gateshead East and Washington West; and what steps are taken to ensure access meets the targets the Department has set.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps are taken to monitor access to cancer treatments for patients in (a) the North East and (b) Gateshead East and Washington West; and what steps are taken to ensure access meets the targets the Department has set.
Asked by
Sharon Hodgson
(Labour)
Answered by
Liam Byrne
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
9 January 2006
For answer on
11 January 2006
Answered on
25 January 2006
The Department, in the NHS Cancer Plan, has set out new goals to reduce waiting times for diagnosis and treatment. There is a maximum two-month wait from urgent general practitioner referral for suspected cancer to start of treatment for all cancers by the end of 2005. For those patients that are routinely referred but subsequently diagnosed with cancer there is a maximum one month wait from diagnosis to treatment by the end of 2005.The monitoring of access to cancer treatments in the North East and Gateshead East is a local matter. However, most recent figures for Northumberland Tyne and Wear strategic health authority show 99.4 per cent. of urgent referrals are seen within two weeks. At Gateshead Health National Health Service Foundation Trust 98.2 per cent. of urgent referrals are seen within two weeks.
Subjects
Access; Cancer; Health services; Medical treatments; Monitoring; North East
Date
25 January 2006
Reference
441 c2182W; 41625
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps are being taken by her Department to improve access to rehabilitation services for brain tumour patients.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps are being taken by her Department to improve access to rehabilitation services for brain tumour patients.
Asked by
John Bercow
(Conservative)
Answered by
Liam Byrne
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
11 January 2006
For answer on
16 January 2006
Answered on
23 January 2006
The Department scoping study is looking at rehabilitation services, including those for brain tumour patients, currently provided by the national health service and social care, with the aim of:"mapping levels of provision and models of service and, where possible, the cost-effectiveness of rehabilitative services;""identifying any gaps in provision;""identifying good practice exemplars; and""identifying opportunities to improve services"The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence is producing guidance on ““Improving Outcomes in Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumours””. It will include advice on rehabilitation services for patients with these forms of cancer. A second draft of this guidance has recently been consulted on and the final guidance is due to be issued in June 2006.
Subjects
Cancer; Health services; Brain; Tumours
Date
23 January 2006
Reference
42487; 441 c1841-2W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how payment by results will operate in respect of cancer services; and if she will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how payment by results will operate in respect of cancer services; and if she will make a statement.
Asked by
John Baron
(Conservative)
Answered by
Liam Byrne
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
11 January 2006
For answer on
16 January 2006
Answered on
20 January 2006
[holding answer 16 January 2006]: Under payment by results (PbR), hospitals are paid according to the number and complexity of cases treated. PbR is being implemented incrementally over a four-year transition period and will cover 67 per cent. of commissioning expenditure by 2008–09.From 2008–09, the intention is to expand the scope of PbR to include chemotherapy and radiotherapy through the introduction of revised casemix classifications known as Healthcare Resource Groups, that is, HRGs Version 4.0. In addition, HRGs are being developed for specialist palliative care. In the meantime, commissioning of these services remain outside the scope of PbR and prices for these services continue to be negotiated locally.
Subjects
Cancer; Health services; Finance; Standards
Date
20 January 2006
Reference
42475; 441 c1659W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the waiting list figures were for cancer care in Lancashire in each of the last 10 years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the waiting list figures were for cancer care in Lancashire in each of the last 10 years.
Asked by
Nigel Evans
(Conservative)
Answered by
Liam Byrne
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
15 July 2005
For answer on
19 July 2005
Answered on
12 September 2005
The information requested is shown in the following tables.
| Number of patients with an urgent referral for suspected cancer received from general practitioner within 24 hours, by waiting time from referral to out-patients appointment, for hospitals in Cumbria and Lancashire strategic health authority (all cancers) Number waiting 14 days or less | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reporting period | RMR Blackpool Victoria hospital NHS trust | RML Blackpool, Wyre and Fylde community health services NHS trust | RXL Blackpool, Fylde and Wyre hospitals NHS trust | REU Burnley healthcare NHS trust | RMB Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley health care NHS trust | RXR East Lancashire hospitals NHS trust | |
| 2001–02 | Q1 | 457 | 165 | n/a | 220 | 235 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q2 | 740 | 177 | n/a | 207 | 217 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q3 | 689 | 158 | n/a | 252 | 223 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q4 | 803 | 149 | n/a | 262 | 229 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q1 | n/a | n/a | 1046 | 333 | 216 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q2 | n/a | n/a | 1082 | 300 | 244 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q3 | n/a | n/a | 1154 | 344 | 260 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q4 | n/a | n/a | 1084 | 317 | 246 | n/a |
| 2003–04 | Q1 | n/a | n/a | 1187 | n/a | n/a | 587 |
| 2003–04 | Q2 | n/a | n/a | 1267 | n/a | n/a | 628 |
| 2003–04 | Q3 | n/a | n/a | 1217 | n/a | n/a | 688 |
| 2003–04 | Q4 | n/a | n/a | 460 | n/a | n/a | 672 |
| 2004–05 | Q1 | n/a | n/a | 1158 | n/a | n/a | 682 |
| 2004–05 | Q2 | n/a | n/a | 1174 | n/a | n/a | 690 |
| 2004–05 | Q3 | n/a | n/a | 1173 | n/a | n/a | 53 |
| 2004–05 | Q4 | n/a | n/a | 1163 | n/a | n/a | 677 |
| Number waiting 14 days or less | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reporting period | RTX Morecambe Bay Hospitals NHS Trust | RNL North Cumbria acute hospitals NHS trust | RMF Preston acute hospitals NHS trust | FDD Chorley and South Ribble NHS trust | RXN Lancashire teaching hospitals NHS trust | |
| 2001–02 | Q1 | 465 | 467 | 204 | 336 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q2 | 487 | 492 | 231 | 325 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q3 | 533 | 594 | 252 | 428 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q4 | 517 | 511 | 291 | 406 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q1 | 599 | 674 | 312 | 435 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q2 | 657 | 734 | n/a | n/a | 822 |
| 2002–03 | Q3 | 655 | 757 | n/a | n/a | 822 |
| 2002–03 | Q4 | 635 | 722 | n/a | n/a | 783 |
| 2003–04 | Q1 | 724 | 831 | n/a | n/a | 843 |
| 2003–04 | Q2 | 738 | 946 | n/a | n/a | 887 |
| 2003–04 | Q3 | 781 | 991 | n/a | n/a | 990 |
| 2003–04 | Q4 | 773 | 1016 | n/a | n/a | 987 |
| 2004–05 | Q1 | 855 | 866 | n/a | n/a | 1092 |
| 2004–05 | Q2 | 882 | 988 | n/a | n/a | 1034 |
| 2004–05 | Q3 | 942 | 1099 | n/a | n/a | 1016 |
| 2004–05 | Q4 | 836 | 934 | n/a | n/a | 916 |
| Number of patients with an urgent referral for suspected cancer received from general practitioner within 24 hours, by waiting time from referral to out-patients appointment, for hospitals in Cumbria and Lancashire Strategic health authority (all cancers) Number waiting more than 14 days | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reporting period | RMR Blackpool Victoria hospital NHS trust | RML Blackpool, Wyre and Fylde community health services NHS trust | RXL Blackpool, Fylde and Wyre hospitals NHS trust | REU Burnley healthcare NHS trust | RMB Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley health care NHS trust | RXR East Lancashire hospitals NHS trust | |
| 2001–02 | Q1 | 0 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q2 | 2 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 1 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q3 | 0 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q4 | 0 | 0 | n/a | 1 | 4 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q1 | n/a | n/a | 0 | 5 | 3 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q2 | n/a | n/a | 0 | 0 | 3 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q3 | n/a | n/a | 1 | 1 | 5 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q4 | n/a | n/a | 0 | 1 | 10 | n/a |
| 2003–04 | Q1 | n/a | n/a | 0 | n/a | n/a | 1 |
| 2003–04 | Q2 | n/a | n/a | 0 | n/a | n/a | 0 |
| 2003–04 | Q3 | n/a | n/a | 0 | n/a | n/a | 1 |
| 2003–04 | Q4 | n/a | n/a | 0 | n/a | n/a | 0 |
| 2004–05 | Q1 | n/a | n/a | 1 | n/a | n/a | 0 |
| 2004–05 | Q2 | n/a | n/a | 0 | n/a | n/a | 0 |
| 2004–05 | Q3 | n/a | n/a | 0 | n/a | n/a | 1 |
| 2004–05 | Q4 | n/a | n/a | 0 | n/a | n/a | 1 |
| Number waiting more than 14 days | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reporting period | RTX Morecambe Bay Hospitals NHS Trust | RNL North Cumbria acute hospitals NHS trust | RMF Preston acute hospitals NHS trust | FDD Chorley and South Ribble NHS trust | RXN Lancashire teaching hospitals NHS trust | |
| 2001–02 | Q1 | 62 | 53 | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q2 | 70 | 85 | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q3 | 35 | 106 | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q4 | 14 | 138 | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q1 | 8 | 137 | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q2 | 2 | 123 | n/a | n/a | 0 |
| 2002–03 | Q3 | 0 | 112 | n/a | n/a | 0 |
| 2002–03 | Q4 | 1 | 167 | n/a | n/a | 0 |
| 2003–04 | Ql | 0 | 178 | n/a | n/a | 0 |
| 2003–04 | Q2 | 0 | 30 | n/a | n/a | 0 |
| 2003–04 | Q3 | 0 | 2 | n/a | n/a | 0 |
| 2003–04 | Q4 | 0 | 2 | n/a | n/a | 0 |
| 2004–05 | Q1 | 0 | 0 | n/a | n/a | 0 |
| 2004–05 | Q2 | 0 | 2 | n/a | n/a | 0 |
| 2004–05 | Q3 | 1 | 2 | n/a | n/a | 0 |
| 2004–05 | Q4 | 0 | 4 | n/a | n/a | 0 |
| Number of patients with an urgent referral for suspected cancer received from general practitioner within 24 hours, by waiting time from referral to out-patients appointment, for hospitals in Cumbria and Lancashire Strategic health authority (all cancers) Percentage | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage waiting 14 days or less | |||||||
| Reporting period | RMR Blackpool Victoria hospital NHS trust | RML Blackpool, Wyre and Fylde community health services NHS trust | RXL Blackpool, Fylde and Wyre hospitals NHS trust | REU Burnley healthcare NHS trust | RMB Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley health care NHS trust | RXR East Lancashire hospitals NHS trust | |
| 2001–02 | Q1 | 100 | 100 | n/a | 100 | 100 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q2 | 100 | 100 | n/a | 100 | 100 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q3 | 100 | 100 | n/a | 100 | 100 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q4 | 100 | 100 | n/a | 100 | 98 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q1 | n/a | n/a | 100 | 99 | 99 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q2 | n/a | n/a | 100 | 100 | 99 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q3 | n/a | n/a | 100 | 100 | 98 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q4 | n/a | n/a | 100 | 100 | 96 | n/a |
| 2003–04 | Q1 | n/a | n/a | 100 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| 2003–04 | Q2 | n/a | n/a | 100 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| 2003–04 | Q3 | n/a | n/a | 100 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| 2003–04 | Q4 | n/a | n/a | 100 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| 2004–05 | Q1 | n/a | n/a | 100 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| 2004–05 | Q2 | n/a | n/a | 100 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| 2004–05 | Q3 | n/a | n/a | 100 | n/a | n/a | 98 |
| 2004–05 | Q4 | n/a | n/a | 100 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| Percentage | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage waiting 14 days or less | ||||||
| Reporting period | RTX Morecambe Bay Hospitals NHS Trust | RNL North Cumbria acute hospitals NHS trust | RMF Preston acute hospitals NHS trust | FDD Chorley and South Ribble NHS trust | RXN Lancashire teaching hospitals NHS trust | |
| 2001–02 | Q1 | 88 | 90 | 100 | 100 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q2 | 87 | 85 | 100 | 100 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q3 | 94 | 85 | 100 | 100 | n/a |
| 2001–02 | Q4 | 97 | 79 | 100 | 100 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q1 | 99 | 83 | 100 | 100 | n/a |
| 2002–03 | Q2 | 100 | 86 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| 2002–03 | Q3 | 100 | 87 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| 2002–03 | Q4 | 100 | 81 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| 2003–04 | Q1 | 100 | 82 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| 2003–04 | Q2 | 100 | 97 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| 2003–04 | Q3 | 100 | 100 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| 2003–04 | Q4 | 100 | 100 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| 2004–05 | Q1 | 100 | 100 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| 2004–05 | Q2 | 100 | 100 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| 2004–05 | Q3 | 100 | 100 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| 2004–05 | Q4 | 100 | 100 | n/a | n/a | 100 |
| Notes 1. RXL Blackpool, Fylde and Wyre hospitals NHS trust formed 2002–03 by merger of RMR Blackpool Victoria hospital NHS Trust and RL Blackpool, Wyre and Fylde community health services NHS trust. 2. RXR East Lancashire hospitals NHS trust formed 2003–04 by merger of REU Burnley healthcare NHS trust and RMB Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care NHS trust. 3. RXN Lancashire teaching hospitals NHS trust formed 2002–03 (effective 1 August 2002) by merger of RMF Preston acute hospitals NHS trust and RJU Chorley and South Ribble NHS trust. Source: CWT-Db, Department of Health |
Subjects
Cancer; Lancashire
Date
12 September 2005
Reference
13740; 436 c2708-12W;436 c2734-40W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Health on what date the Greater Manchester Strategic Health Authority received ministerial authority to start the Specialist Cancer Services Review.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health on what date the Greater Manchester Strategic Health Authority received ministerial authority to start the Specialist Cancer Services Review.
Asked by
Graham Stringer
(Labour)
Answered by
Liam Byrne
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
20 June 2005
For answer on
23 June 2005
Answered on
27 June 2005
[holding answer 23 June 2005]: In line with the Department's Shifting the Balance of Power initiative, the Greater Manchester Strategic Health Authority is not required to seek ministerial approval prior to undertaking a service review.
Subjects
Cancer; Health services; Greater Manchester
Date
27 June 2005
Reference
435 c1340W; 6686
House
House of Commons