Whether HMG are monitoring traffic flows and conditions on the A34/ M4 between the A34/M4 intersection and Beacon Hill in either direction and related questions. - Inc figures.

Whether HMG are monitoring traffic flows and conditions on the A34/ M4 between the A34/M4 intersection and Beacon Hill in either direction and related questions. - Inc figures.

What is the number of occasions on which either carriageway of the M4 motorway has been closed during the last 12 months and what are the reasons for the closures. - Inc figures.

What is the number of occasions on which either carriageway of the M4 motorway has been closed during the last 12 months and what are the reasons for the closures. - Inc figures.

Whether their Answer of June 15th (536 c73W) indicates that only schemes that are "initiated and progressed" together are to be so appraised, whether any such "appraisals" have yet taken place; and whether one is to take place in the context of the M.4-M.25 schemes.

Whether their Answer of June 15th (536 c73W) indicates that only schemes that are "initiated and progressed" together are to be so appraised, whether any such "appraisals" have yet taken place; and whether one is to take place in the context of the M.4-M.25 schemes.

Whether HMG are still committed "ensuring that public transport alternatives are explicitly considered" (response to the SACTRA report) and whether this consideration is not absent from their better motorways documents and their M.4-M.25 schemes.

Whether HMG are still committed "ensuring that public transport alternatives are explicitly considered" (response to the SACTRA report) and whether this consideration is not absent from their better motorways documents and their M.4-M.25 schemes.

If their answer at 547 c37WA means that their current M.4-M.25 schemes have been put forward before regional planning guidance for South East has been agreed and published despite their undertakings in their Response to Report of Standing Committee on Trunk Road Assessment (SACTRA) of March 1992.

If their answer at 547 c37WA means that their current M.4-M.25 schemes have been put forward before regional planning guidance for South East has been agreed and published despite their undertakings in their Response to Report of Standing Committee on Trunk Road Assessment (SACTRA) of March 1992.

If short- and long-term effects of transport pollution have been calculated and fully taken into account in M.4-M.25 schemes and if local environmental health officers concur with DTps calculations and proposals.

If short- and long-term effects of transport pollution have been calculated and fully taken into account in M.4-M.25 schemes and if local environmental health officers concur with DTps calculations and proposals.

What "public transport alternatives [were] explicitly considered in the [M4-M25] appraisal" (paragraph 16.09, SACTRA response).

What "public transport alternatives [were] explicitly considered in the [M4-M25] appraisal" (paragraph 16.09, SACTRA response).

How the M4-M25 schemes are encompassed in the terms of the relevant regional policy guidance referred to in the SACTRA response which will set out strategic policies for land use & transport & when will this guidance be published.

How the M4-M25 schemes are encompassed in the terms of the relevant regional policy guidance referred to in the SACTRA response which will set out strategic policies for land use & transport & when will this guidance be published.

Lords statement on additions or improvements to the motorway system needed to cater for traffic using the proposed fifth terminal at Heathrow.

Lords statement on additions or improvements to the motorway system needed to cater for traffic using the proposed fifth terminal at Heathrow.