Skip to main content

1-18 of 18 results for subject:Legislation

Answering member X
Lord Callanan

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

More
Callanan, Lord (18)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their policy on the publication of impact assessments in relation to (1) primary legislation, and (2) secondary legislation.

Asked by
Lord Goodlad (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 June 2021
Reference
HL490
House
House of Lords

Lords motion that, further to the resolutions of this House on 14 and 28 January, and that of the House of Commons on 14 March, it is expedient that a joint committee of Lords and Commons be appointed to consider and report on the costs and implications for the United...

Lead member
Baroness Smith of Basildon
Answering member
Lord Callanan
Department
Department for Exiting the European Union
Type
Debates
Date
3 July 2019
Reference
798
House
House of Lords

Lords question for short debate on what legislation is necessary to enable a further referendum on the United Kingdom's membership of the European Union to take place in 2019.

Lead member
Lord Tyler
Answering member
Lord Callanan
Department
Department for Exiting the European Union
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
17 January 2019
Reference
795 cc2109-151
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have already put in place many of the legislative building blocks to deliver our exit from the EU. Five exit-related Bills have been passed and six more are now making their way through Parliament. We are also making good progress on the secondary legislation needed to ensure that we have a functioning statute book on exit day.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 January 2019
Reference
794 c2020
House
House of Lords

I can certainly give the noble Baroness an assurance that we will allow for proper scrutiny. Perhaps I may correct her statement on the number of SIs. As we wrote to the sifting committees just before Christmas, we now estimate that the number of SIs we will need by exit day is slightly fewer than 600, of which we have already tabled more than 300.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 January 2019
Reference
794 c2021
House
House of Lords

Discussions on the time allowed for legislation are a matter for the usual channels. Co-operation in this House has always been good, and I can assure noble Lords that that co-operation will continue with any required legislation.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 January 2019
Reference
794 c2021
House
House of Lords

I assume that the noble Baroness did not listen to the answer I gave earlier, and not for the first time the Liberal Democrats have got their figures wrong. We have already tabled more than 50% of the required statutory instruments, as we informed the two sifting committees before Christmas.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 January 2019
Reference
794 c2021
House
House of Lords

The Prime Minister has appeared numerous times in the House of Commons and will be doing so later this week, but she has other matters to attend to as well. In response to the question put by the noble Baroness, no, I will not rule out the fact that there could be no deal. No deal is the absence of a deal. If the Labour Party is really serious about avoiding no deal, there is a deal on the table for it to vote for.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 January 2019
Reference
794 c2022
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for his extremely constructive attitude. It allows me to come back on a point raised by the noble Baroness which I did not answer. She said that there are 600 SIs to table. That is the total that will be required, and the figure has been revised down from our original estimate of between 800 and 1,000. We have already tabled more than 50% of them. The rest will be tabled in due course to allow for proper parliamentary scrutiny using the sifting committee chaired by the noble Lord.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 January 2019
Reference
794 c2022
House
House of Lords

I accept the noble Lord’s clarification. We have submitted over 300 of them for the appropriate scrutiny, and the rest will be submitted for scrutiny in due course.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 January 2019
Reference
794 c2022
House
House of Lords

I am not sure I like the noble and learned Baroness’s term “crash out”. We will leave on 29 March because we had a referendum on the subject and because Parliament, both in this House and the other, has voted on two occasions—in the notification of withdrawal Act and the withdrawal Act—for the UK to leave and for the referendum Bill to be approved. We, the European Commission and the Irish Government have made it clear that there will not be a hard border on the island of Ireland.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 January 2019
Reference
794 c2022
House
House of Lords

I do not have those figures in front of me. I will write to the noble Lord on that.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 January 2019
Reference
794 c2022
House
House of Lords

As I said in the earlier answer, the progress of legislation in this House is a matter for the usual channels, in which co-operation with the opposition parties is always ongoing. I am sure the Chief Whip will want to continue that. As for ruling out no deal, no deal is what happens if you do not have a deal. We leave the EU on 29 March this year because that is the legislation that Parliament has passed on two occasions, and it is what Article 50 says. There is a mechanism to avoid no deal, and that is to vote for the only deal available.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 January 2019
Reference
794 c2023
House
House of Lords

I will not advise the noble Lord and others what amendments can be acceptable. That is not my role. There are a number of pieces of primary legislation still before this House and, if we are in a no-deal situation, further pieces of primary legislation will be forthcoming.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 January 2019
Reference
794 c2023
House
House of Lords

Of course, it will be a challenge, but I am sure all Members of this House want to see us leave the European Union in a smooth and orderly manner, which requires the appropriate legislation to be put in place.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 January 2019
Reference
794 c2023
House
House of Lords

I never said there was any delay caused by the sifting committees. They are carrying out the proper role allocated to them by this House and by the legislation. We are accepting all their recommendations. If they think SIs should not be negative but positive, our record is that we have accepted all their recommendations so far.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 January 2019
Reference
794 c2023
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is their proposed timetable for the passage of all remaining (1) primary, and (2) secondary legislation required for Brexit by 29 March 2019.

Asked by
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
7 January 2019
Reference
794 cc2020-3
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what additional primary legislation will be required prior to 29 March 2019 in the event of a 'no deal' Brexit.

Asked by
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Exiting the European Union
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 September 2018
Reference
HL9915
House
House of Lords