Skip to main content

1-20 of 25 results for subject:Methane

Answering member X
Lord Callanan

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Callanan, Lord (25)
More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the impact of methane flaring on meeting the United Kingdom’s carbon budgets; and what plans they have to ban this practice.

Asked by
Baroness Sheehan (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
9 March 2023
Reference
828 cc882-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government recognise that eliminating routine methane flaring is a priority. North Sea flaring has halved in the past four years. We have committed to make every effort to ensure that routine flaring from oil and gas fields ends as soon as possible, ahead of the World Bank’s zero routine flaring by 2030 target. Methane emissions are fully accounted for in the UK’s carbon budgets, and the oil and gas sector is on track to deliver against this target.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2023
Reference
828 c883
House
House of Lords

These are complicated technological and economic matters. If it were as simple as the noble Baroness makes out, we would do it, but we are working to do it as quickly as possible. The figures that I quoted are from a press release from the North Sea Transition Authority that was issued today—the authority must have seen the noble Baroness’s Question. Flaring is down by 50% since 2018. We must not get this out of proportion; of the UK’s methane emissions, only 1.6% are from the oil and gas sector, compared with the likes of the 49% that come from agriculture.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2023
Reference
828 c883
House
House of Lords

My noble friend makes a good point. Some 30% of our emissions are from the waste sector, which is one of the sectors where we are doing our best to try to reduce emissions because the gas is valuable and can be used, and indeed it is trapped on some sites. We have a system of supporting anaerobic digesters to deal with the waste; they can produce green gas that is then fed into the gas main.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2023
Reference
828 c883
House
House of Lords

I have checked figures with officials from the last time the noble Baroness asked me that question, and I am confident in the information that I have been given and the UK statistics. The noble Baroness shakes her head, but the figures are probably more reliable than some of her scientists.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2023
Reference
828 c884
House
House of Lords

My noble friend makes a good point, and I touched on it in an earlier answer. We want to try to trap as much of this gas as possible because it is a valuable resource. As I mentioned, the green gas support scheme is a system that uses a gas levy to support anaerobic digesters across the country to take some of the waste food and organic matter that can be turned into useful gas that is fed into the gas main.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2023
Reference
828 c884
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness asked a number of questions there. We can argue about the figures but we can all agree that it is something that we want to eliminate as quickly as possible. We have a target to get rid of all flaring emissions by 2030, as I mentioned in earlier answers, but let us not get this out of proportion. These are 1.6% of our emissions, which we should eliminate as quickly as possible, but, as the noble Baroness mentioned, the bigger sectors to tackle are agriculture and waste, as other noble Lords have mentioned.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2023
Reference
828 c884
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for that question. I am not familiar with that incident, but I will speak to officials when I get back to the department.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2023
Reference
828 c884
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord makes a very good point. The finest minds in the Civil Service have been devoted to deciding the acronym for the new department. “Deznez” seems to be the favourite, though I should say that my Secretary of State rightly points out that no one has any idea what all these acronyms stand for so we should use its full title, which is the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2023
Reference
828 c885
House
House of Lords

I am happy to arrange a briefing with officials for the noble Lord if he would like, but the technical difficulties are, first, technological, in that it requires a lot of new infrastructure and pipework to be installed, and some of the facilities that flare are oil platforms that do not have facilities to pipe the gas to shore. Secondly, there are huge economic costs associated with it; obviously, some of the infrastructure goes back to the 1970s.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2023
Reference
828 c885
House
House of Lords

My noble friend is dogged in his determination to get tidal on the agenda. I agree with him that we need more renewable energy, and we have allocated a number of CfD contracts to different forms of tidal energy.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2023
Reference
828 c885
House
House of Lords

The noble and gallant Lord deserves a longer answer than I have time for. CCUS is emerging technology. We have a huge programme of support and will be making announcements shortly about the track 1 cluster, to use the jargon, of some of the schemes that will be supported. There are a number of innovative schemes around the UK that deserve our backing.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2023
Reference
828 c885
House
House of Lords

The short answer is it is not the responsibility of DESNZ but of Defra in terms of environmental protection, but I will pass on the noble Lord’s comments.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2023
Reference
828 c885
House
House of Lords

People are always quoting various scientists at me, and for one opinion there are others. I am confident in the figures that the UK uses for our emissions.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 2023
Reference
828 c886
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government, further to their commitment to the Global Methane Pledge launched at COP26, what plans they have to set a target for reducing methane emissions by 30 per cent on 2020 levels by 2030.

Asked by
Baroness Blackstone (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
22 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1647-1650
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the UK has adopted early and ambitious measures to tackle methane emissions. Between 1990 and 2020, UK methane emissions dropped by 62%, more than any other OECD country. The Government recognise the urgency to do more and are pursuing efforts to secure further emissions reductions in line with the net-zero strategy and our carbon budgets. The Government’s approach is consistent with the global methane pledge as a global reduction target.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
22 February 2023
Reference
827 c1647
House
House of Lords

I do know the answers to the noble Baroness’s questions, she will be shocked to know. In answer to her first question, I say that the UK is signed up to, and helping to implement, a global target. On the waste sector, she is absolutely

right that we need to do more. Landfill emissions over the last 25 years have been tackled in two ways: by reducing the amount of biodegradable waste going to landfill, with the landfill tax being a key driver, and by increasing the efficiency of methane collection from existing landfills. The other thing we need to do more is to increase waste food collections, so that we can generate more clean gas through anaerobic digesters, which is part of my department’s policies.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
22 February 2023
Reference
827 c1647
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is right that we need to do better venting and flaring; it is a priority. We set out our commitment to the World Bank’s Zero Routine Flaring by 2030 initiative, as the noble Lord said. We are working with regulators and industry to eliminate this practice as soon as we possibly can.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
22 February 2023
Reference
827 c1648
House
House of Lords

The explosion in the Nord Stream pipeline was truly shocking, with large quantities of gas released. I do not think that any investigations have yet shown who is responsible for that; I am sure we all have our strong suspicions. It was an appalling act of sabotage. I am sure that the authorities in the MoD and the security services are looking very closely at all our own interconnecting pipelines.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
22 February 2023
Reference
827 c1648
House
House of Lords

Of course we will want to make sure that the information and published figures are as accurate as possible, but I think the noble Baroness does us a little bit of a disservice. We have reduced our methane emissions in the UK, as I said,

by 62%. That is much better than the US and the EU 27. Clearly, we need to do more, but we have a good record in this area.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
22 February 2023
Reference
827 c1648
House
House of Lords