Skip to main content

1-17 of 17 results for subject:Contractorisation

Answering member X
Kenneth Carlisle

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Carlisle, Kenneth (17)
More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

What proposals he has for the future ownership and management of the Atomic Weapons Establishment, Llanishen, Cardiff; and if he will state the timing proposed for changes and the policy considerations underlying his decision.

Asked by
Rhodri Morgan (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 March 1992
Reference
205 c143W;205 c141W
House
House of Commons

From which subheads of which Votes funds for his Department's contracts with the Atomic Energy Authority establishment at Harwell are taken; & what contracts his Department has with the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority establishment at Harwell; what are the purposes of these contracts.

Asked by
Harry Cohen (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 February 1992
Reference
204 c394W
House
House of Commons

What steps he is taking to ensure that employees of AWRE are provided with the same opportunities to remain within the UKAEA pension scheme after privatisation as former AWRE employees who transferred to the employment of British Nuclear fuels Ltd. and Amersham plc.

Asked by
Teddy Taylor (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 February 1991
Reference
186 c388W;186 c386W
House
House of Commons

What representations he has received recently about the Government's proposed contractorisation of AWE. (Failed OPQ)

Asked by
Andrew Hunter (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 February 1991
Reference
186 c134W
House
House of Commons

What estimate he has now made of the costs anticipated for 1991-92, 1992-93, 1993-94 and 1994-95 to fund the proposals by the Atomic Weapons Establishment Bill, since his statement to the House of 18th December 1990, Official Report 183, column 243-51.

Asked by
Allan Rogers (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 February 1991
Reference
185 c321-2W;185 c323-4W
House
House of Commons

What arrangements are envisaged for the disposal of nuclear waste from the Atomic Weapons Establishment after its contractorisation.

Asked by
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 1990
Reference
183 c135W;183 c134W
House
House of Commons

Who will be the employer of members of staff in the Safety Division of the Atomic Weapons Establishment under the proposed contractorisation.

Asked by
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 1990
Reference
183 c136W;183 c135-6W
House
House of Commons

What steps have been taken to ensure that the company currently producing proposals for the full contractorisation of the Atomic Weapons Establishment will not derive an unfair advantage in competing for the contract in 1992.

Asked by
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 1990
Reference
183 c136W;183 c135W
House
House of Commons

What differences there will be in the index-linking arrangements between the new Atomic Weapons Establishment pension scheme that is due to be arranged as a result of the contractorisation of the Atomic Weapons Establishment and the existing Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme and the UKAEA Pension Scheme.

Asked by
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 1990
Reference
183 c135W;183 c134-5W
House
House of Commons

What arrangements are planned for redundancy payments under the new AWE pension scheme that is due to be arranged as a result of the contractorisation of the Atomic Weapons Establishment.

Asked by
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 1990
Reference
183 c135-6W;183 c135W
House
House of Commons

Whether the company selected to operate the Atomic Weapons Establishment after contractorisation will be allowed to alter the number and grades of staff in the safety division of the Establishment.

Asked by
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 1990
Reference
183 c136-7W;183 c136W
House
House of Commons

If he will provide details of the proposed relationship between the Compliance Directorate and the Safety Division of the Atomic Weapons Establishment under Phase 2 of the contractorisation programme.

Asked by
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 1990
Reference
183 c136W;183 c135W
House
House of Commons

Whether it is envisaged that the company that wins the contract to operate the Atomic Weapons Establishment will have the power to alter the pension arrangements for the staff of the Atomic Weapons Establishment.

Asked by
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 1990
Reference
183 c136W
House
House of Commons

Whether it is intended that the company running the Atomic Weapons Establishment after contractorisation will be able to alter the redundancy arrangements of the staff of the Atomic Weapons Establishment.

Asked by
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 1990
Reference
183 c134-5W;183 c134W
House
House of Commons

What arrangements have been made for contractorisation at Aldermaston; and with what implications for safety and security. (Failed OPQ)

Asked by
Frank Doran (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c499W;178 c497W
House
House of Commons

What arrangements have been made for contractorisation at Aldermaston; and with what implications for safety and security. (Failed OPQ)

Asked by
Maria Fyfe (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c499W;178 c497W
House
House of Commons

What arrangements have been made for contractorisation at Aldermaston; and with what implications for safety and security. (Failed OPQ)

Asked by
John Cummings (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c499W;178 c497W
House
House of Commons