Skip to main content

1-9 of 9 results for subject:Fracking

Answering member X
Alistair Carmichael

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

More
Carmichael, Alistair (9)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

If he will make it his policy that responsibility for licensing shale gas extraction should be devolved to the Scottish Parliament.

Asked by
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
14 January 2015
Reference
906918; 590 cc849-850
House
House of Commons

That is already Government policy. As the hon. Lady will be aware, the Smith commission heads of agreement stated that the licensing of onshore oil and gas extraction should be devolved to the Scottish Parliament. The Government are committed to publishing draft clauses in that respect by 25 January.

Answered by
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 January 2015
Reference
590 c849
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is right to say that the Scottish Government have planning and environmental regulation powers that would enable them to block any fracking project they wanted to block. It is sensible, in the circumstances, that they should be given responsibility for the licensing of such activities as well. That will be done as part of the Smith process.

Answered by
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 January 2015
Reference
590 c849
House
House of Commons

That is part of the timetable to which we are all committed. Until I heard the Deputy First Minister speak at the National museum, I had thought that the hon. Gentleman’s party was committed to it as well. We are proceeding with that speedy and

tight process. I will publish the draft clauses before 25 August—sorry, I mean 25 January, which is, incidentally, before 25 August. With 25 January being a Sunday, we might even meet the deadline with a few days to spare.

Answered by
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 January 2015
Reference
590 c849
House
House of Commons

The position will be as it is at the moment, which is that if there is any fracking project in Scotland, the hon. Gentleman’s colleagues in the Scottish Government will have the power, using planning or environmental regulations, to block it. They should not seek to push the blame on to anyone else.

Answered by
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 January 2015
Reference
590 c850
House
House of Commons

No, I am afraid that I cannot assist the hon. Lady in that regard. All I can do is point to the fact that the Scottish Government seem to be desperate to speak about the powers that are held by others, rather than about the way in which they will exercise the powers that they already have. Her constituents and others will doubtless draw their own conclusions.

Answered by
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 January 2015
Reference
590 c850
House
House of Commons

I pay tribute to the hon. Gentleman for his efforts on this matter and, in particular, for tabling his amendments. As was made clear to him yesterday in Committee, the Government will return to the matter on Report. We will table an amendment that we believe will achieve the same end, which is the carving out of Scotland from those provisions in the Infrastructure Bill. He is absolutely right that licensing is just one element—it provides no overall entitlement. For fracking to go ahead, the Scottish Government have to give consent on planning and environmental grounds.

Answered by
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 January 2015
Reference
590 c850
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady and I discussed a section 106 order when we met recently, but I have to tell her that the route that she has identified—a section 106 order followed by a section 63 order—is not, in our view, the appropriate one to honour the commitments in the Smith programme. That would devolve competence to the Government in Scotland, not the Parliament, which would need a section 30 order. I just do not see how we will achieve that end in the time available to us in this Parliament, but we are determined that where there is a need for joint working between the two Governments to achieve a better transfer of power, my right hon. Friend the Under-Secretary and I will be engaged in that process.

Answered by
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 January 2015
Reference
590 c851
House
House of Commons

Like everybody else, the hon. Gentleman will have to wait to see what recommendations come from the Smith commission. The Government were responsible for setting it up and we will deliver on the heads of agreement when they are published, but it would not be appropriate for me, standing at this Dispatch Box now, to second-guess what Lord Smith is going to say.

Answered by
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 November 2014
Reference
588 c907
House
House of Commons