Skip to main content

1-20 of 22 results for subject:Fracking

Answering member X
Ed Davey

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

More
Davey, Ed (22)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am sure that the hon. Gentleman would like every Government to follow everything that New York state does, but we are an independent country and we make our own decisions. He will know that the Government’s policy on fracking is to support it through a robust and strong regulatory regime to ensure that health and safety and environmental concerns are fully taken into account, but also that we can exploit this important resource.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 December 2014
Reference
589 c1550
House
House of Commons

Of course we are looking at all issues around future devolution of energy policy following the referendum and the commitments made by the Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister. On fracking, it is often not understood that the Scottish Government, the equivalent of the Environment Agency in Scotland and local planning authorities in Scotland already have a huge role to play in the development of fracking in Scotland.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
6 November 2014
Reference
587 c961
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what estimate he has made of the volume of water required in shale gas extraction for (a) a single hydraulic fracture and (b) over the course of a well's lifetime.

Asked by
Tom Greatrex (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2014
Reference
205583; 584 c969W
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for my hon. Friend’s question, because I was very much involved in those discussions with the European Commission and European colleagues. The House needs to be clear that the European Commission

is talking about something that we proposed—namely, publishing guidance about how existing European directives on things such as emissions, water and mining should apply to the new shale oil and gas industry. It is also worth noting that our regulations, which we have updated and ensured are fit for purpose, are the strongest in the world.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 January 2014
Reference
573 c990
House
House of Commons

In 2016, we will be the first country to set a decarbonisation target, so the idea that we are being slow on that is preposterous. On shale gas, we are behind other countries—she may have noticed that the US has already gone into it. We are determined to see whether this country can benefit from shale gas, but we will ensure that we protect the environment and take the public with us. That is the right way to get the benefits for the country that shale gas might well offer.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
6 June 2013
Reference
563 c1656
House
House of Commons

Shale gas may prove to be a useful addition to the UK’s diverse portfolio of energy sources, and would be particularly valuable in replacing declining North sea supplies, with benefits to energy security as well as to the economy and employment—but its exploitation will be acceptable only if it is safe and the environment is properly protected.

Hydraulic fracturing operations for shale gas were suspended last year, pending consideration of seismic events in Lancashire. Based on the latest evidence and expert advice, and having considered the responses to a public consultation on that advice, I have concluded that, in principle, fracking for shale gas can be allowed to resume— subject to new controls to mitigate the risk of seismicity. I have made full details available to both Houses by means of a comprehensive written statement tabled this morning.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c431
House
House of Commons

I agree that shale gas has an important part to play in our energy mix and in our economy, and I also agree that we must ensure that communities benefit and that there is proper environmental regulation. I have been very impressed by the way in which Members in all parts of the House have contributed to the debate and to the Department’s thinking, but I pay particular tribute to the hon. Member for Fylde (Mark Menzies), who, along with the independent experts, has really influenced our thinking. It is very important for us to take the public with us as we explore the potential for shale gas in the United Kingdom.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c431
House
House of Commons

Let me also pay tribute to the work that my hon. Friend has done for his constituents, who I know are concerned about shale gas. I can reassure him that the regulations that we already have in the United Kingdom are much stronger than those in many American states where fracking for gas has been taking place for many years. We have the regulations, controls and powers of the Environment Agency, the regulations, controls and powers of the Health and Safety Executive and the

regulations, controls and powers of my own Department, so we already have a strong regulatory regime. However, if the exploration suggests that there is potential for commercial development and we move in that direction, we will keep that regime under review, and will tighten and strengthen it if necessary. Today’s announcement is about new controls to ensure that seismicity is not a problem.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c431
House
House of Commons

I do not think that anyone has described me as a frackhead. My job is to make certain that the environmental and safety controls are there, and I believe that the work that we have done, particularly on the seismicity aspect but also on other aspects, can reassure the public in that regard. I am determined to ensure that the environment is properly protected, and as Members will see if they read my statement, I have also commissioned a study of the potential impact of shale gas exploration on greenhouse gas emissions. I hope that that will reassure people on the environmental side as well.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c432
House
House of Commons

I repeat my thanks to the hon. Gentleman. The way in which he has stood up for his constituents provides a model for all Members. I can reassure him that the Office for Unconventional Gas will be a strong office, and that it will be in my Department and accountable to Ministers, so that Members can hold us to account in the House. One of its jobs will be bringing together the various regulatory bodies so that they are properly co-ordinated, and our work as we approach potential commercial development in a few years’ time will include ensuring that we have all the regulatory controls that we need.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c432
House
House of Commons

The whole House listens to the hon. Gentleman closely on these issues because he is an expert on drilling and all aspects of the coal industry. I do not know the case to which he refers, but if he wishes to write to me, I am sure my officials can look into it. He makes an important contribution to this debate, because he highlights the fact that this country has had to tackle methane emissions in the coal and the oil and gas industries, so we have a lot of knowledge, experience and expertise to draw on to make sure we can control emissions from shale gas.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c433
House
House of Commons

First, I thank the right hon. Lady for saying she will look at our statement carefully. I know that her colleague, the hon. Member for Rutherglen and Hamilton West (Tom Greatrex), wrote to my hon. Friend the Member for Wealden when he was a Minister to set out the Opposition’s conditions. I believe that when the Opposition study the written ministerial statement—we gave a copy to the right hon. Lady before this Question Time, but she should have a chance to examine it—they will see that we have met all the conditions.

The right hon. Lady’s main question was on prices. I agree with my hon. Friend the Member for Wealden that we should not bet the farm on shale gas. I am absolutely clear that the most responsible and sensible way forward for energy policy is to have a diverse set of resources and sources for our energy. Some of the press and commentariat have got very excited about the possibility of gas prices falling, but the independent analysis and the International Energy Agency findings do not necessarily support that.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c433
House
House of Commons

I agree with my hon. Friend that we should proceed with caution, and we are doing so. The evidence so far suggests that the carbon footprint of shale gas exploration is only slightly higher than that for conventional gas, but I am determined that we in this country examine it seriously, which is why I have commissioned a study.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c434
House
House of Commons

We liaise closely with the Environment Agency on this issue, and it confirms that volumes of water used in shale gas exploration are not exceptional compared with other industrial activities that routinely take place across the United Kingdom. Any operator who wishes to abstract water as an alternative to using public supplies will need a licence. Additional water abstraction will be authorised only where it is sustainable and no risks are posed to the rights of existing abstraction licence holders.

Shale gas exploration is at a very early stage in the UK, and its possible scale is as yet unknown. We have legally binding carbon budgets, and that should reassure

the hon. Lady. In addition, I hope that she will be reassured to know that I have announced today that I am commissioning a study of the possible impacts of shale gas development on greenhouse gas emissions.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 cc441-2
House
House of Commons

We have legally binding commitments under the Climate Change Act 2008, and our carbon budgets have been set out for people to look at. When we announce strategies it is not unusual for there to be a whole set of analyses, including sensitivity analysis. Yes, one analysis showed higher carbon intensities, but there was also an analysis that showed lower carbon intensities, and I think that people have missed that.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c442
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the hon. Gentleman’s question. The Environment Agency will carry out the monitoring, but because we have increased the co-ordination of regulatory bodies, my Department will be aware of it. I hope that I assured him in my answer to the hon. Member for Brighton, Pavilion (Caroline Lucas) that the terms of any additional licences would have to ensure that the abstraction was sustainable and would not put at risk the rights of existing licence holders.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c442
House
House of Commons

I can certainly reassure my hon. Friend that communities will be fully consulted. We have made it clear that the regulatory regime is strong, and it will be strengthened if need be. We have put in the co-ordination that will give her constituents the reassurances that they need.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c447
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what steps he has taken to exploit reserves of shale gas in the UK.
Asked by
Andrew Selous (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
133319; 555 cc430-4
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what steps he has taken to exploit reserves of shale gas in the UK.
Asked by
Paul Maynard (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
133331; 555 cc430-4
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what assessment he has made of the environmental effects of shale gas exploitation in the UK.
Asked by
Kerry McCarthy (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
133333; 555 cc431-4
House
House of Commons