1-20 of 61 results for subject:Protection
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.252 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.008 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Protection
- We searched for
- subject_t:Protection OR subject_ses:92640
Answering member
X
Lord Davies of Oldham
Type
+
Members' contributions (41)
-
Oral answers to questions (35)
-
Oral questions (6)
+
Parliamentary proceedings (4)
+
Debates (4)
+
Legislative debates (2)
-
Debates on bills (1)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (1)
-
Questions for short debate (2)
+
Parliamentary questions (22)
-
Oral questions (6)
-
Written questions (16)
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Davies of Oldham, Lord (61)
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Draft Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Carrying on Regulated Activities by Way of Business) (Amendment) Order 2011 (SI 2011/2304). Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room. [Relevant document: 27th report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments]
Draft Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Carrying on Regulated Activities by Way of Business) (Amendment) Order 2011 (SI 2011/2304). Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room. [Relevant document: 27th report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments]
Lead member
Lord De Mauley
Answering member
Lord Davies of Oldham
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Legislation
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Carrying on Regulated Activities by Way of Business) (Amendment) Order 2011
Subjects
Consumers; Housing; Financial services; Financial Services Authority; Protection; Regulation; Leaseback arrangements
Date
7 September 2011
Reference
730 c59-64GC
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I will certainly look into that. It is not part of my notes, but it sounds like exactly the type of relic that we would be very concerned to safeguard and I undertake to examine the issue immediately.
My Lords, I will certainly look into that. It is not part of my notes, but it sounds like exactly the type of relic that we would be very concerned to safeguard and I undertake to examine the issue immediately.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Asked by
Lord Roberts of Conwy
(Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
The first ever British submarine lies off the coast of north Wales at Rhyl. It was invented by a vicar, I think, from Merseyside. It has been subject to a lot of looting and there are a number of wind turbines in the vicinity. Will the noble Lord please ensure that what remains of the submarine is preserved?
Subjects
Cultural heritage; Protection; Seas and oceans; Wrecks
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1549
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, there is protection for ships that are war graves. On the issue that my noble friend raised, there is no real anxiety either about the great monuments under the sea, which are ships that served in the Navy and met disaster, or about ships that need to be protected because they are war graves in British waters. The problem is with the great deal of other historical data, of which at the moment we only have some. We will need to establish a great deal more as a result of the legislation established last year.
My Lords, there is protection for ships that are war graves. On the issue that my noble friend raised, there is no real anxiety either about the great monuments under the sea, which are ships that served in the Navy and met disaster, or about ships that need to be protected because they are war graves in British waters. The problem is with the great deal of other historical data, of which at the moment we only have some. We will need to establish a great deal more as a result of the legislation established last year.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Asked by
Baroness Gardner of Parkes
(Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
What is the position with regard to ships that are war graves? Are they protected already under an international agreement?
Subjects
Cultural heritage; Protection; Seas and oceans; Wrecks
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1548
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the Question was about marine archaeology rather than contemporary fishing. I think that the noble Lord was in attendance when I gave a clear exposition of the Government’s strategy for reform of the common fisheries policy to the advantage of British fishermen.
My Lords, the Question was about marine archaeology rather than contemporary fishing. I think that the noble Lord was in attendance when I gave a clear exposition of the Government’s strategy for reform of the common fisheries policy to the advantage of British fishermen.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Asked by
Lord Howard of Rising
(Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, if the Minister is so keen on maintaining underwater assets, could he get some of this country’s fishing rights back?
Subjects
Cultural heritage; Protection; Seas and oceans; Wrecks
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1548
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, we have safeguards and clear practice with regard to HMS "Victory", because it was a ship of the line involved in naval battle. We have clear protection for wrecks of that significance to the history of the nation. However, the data on what exists under the sea, a great deal of which will need care and protection, must be developed. English Heritage has indicated that it wants to play the part that I indicated a moment ago in response to my noble friend. The question of resources must flow from the identification of needs.
My Lords, we have safeguards and clear practice with regard to HMS "Victory", because it was a ship of the line involved in naval battle. We have clear protection for wrecks of that significance to the history of the nation. However, the data on what exists under the sea, a great deal of which will need care and protection, must be developed. English Heritage has indicated that it wants to play the part that I indicated a moment ago in response to my noble friend. The question of resources must flow from the identification of needs.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Asked by
Lord Redesdale
(Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, will English Heritage have the capability of undertaking this large task without extra funds, which do not seem to be available at present? Is the Minister considering increasing the funds to English Heritage to undertake this work? Without them, can the safety of HMS "Victory" be protected from those who would undertake looting—or, as they would call it, archaeology—and be secured for the future?
Subjects
Cultural heritage; Protection; Seas and oceans; Wrecks
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1548
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I take careful note of that reference and will renew my acquaintance with Dean Acheson’s book. I emphasise that the reason why we have reservations about the convention, as have other countries with a naval history almost as significant as ours—I think of France, which has also not signed—is that we have such a rich heritage in our waters that we must be absolutely secure in the process whereby we safeguard it. There is no doubt that this is not just an issue of the western approaches; because the United Kingdom is an island state, we are particularly rich in these terms.
My Lords, I take careful note of that reference and will renew my acquaintance with Dean Acheson’s book. I emphasise that the reason why we have reservations about the convention, as have other countries with a naval history almost as significant as ours—I think of France, which has also not signed—is that we have such a rich heritage in our waters that we must be absolutely secure in the process whereby we safeguard it. There is no doubt that this is not just an issue of the western approaches; because the United Kingdom is an island state, we are particularly rich in these terms.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Asked by
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville
(Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, may I encourage the Minister to get from the Library Dean Acheson’s great account of his time as Secretary of State, Present at the Creation, and to read the passage on Winston Churchill’s speech to Truman after he became Prime Minister in 1951 about the desirability of the British having the command in NATO of the western approaches because of the scale of the maritime history of our nation that lay below those waters?
Subjects
Cultural heritage; Protection; Seas and oceans; Wrecks
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1548-9
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the Government are continuing to work on implementing the provisions of the Marine and Coastal Access Act. We are looking at options for strengthening protection of significant underwater cultural heritage assets beyond territorial waters. We are observing how signatories of the 2001 Convention on Underwater Cultural Heritage go about implementing it. We support the principles of the annexe of the convention in respect of best practice and treatment of underwater cultural heritage.
My Lords, the Government are continuing to work on implementing the provisions of the Marine and Coastal Access Act. We are looking at options for strengthening protection of significant underwater cultural heritage assets beyond territorial waters. We are observing how signatories of the 2001 Convention on Underwater Cultural Heritage go about implementing it. We support the principles of the annexe of the convention in respect of best practice and treatment of underwater cultural heritage.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Asked by
Lord Howarth of Newport
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what plans they have to strengthen protection of cultural heritage assets in waters beyond 12 nautical miles offshore.
Subjects
Cultural heritage; Protection; Seas and oceans; Wrecks
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1547
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend for raising this question, which is important in the context of the establishment of the Marine Management Organisation and the work that has to be done in implementing the Act, which came into force last year. The MoD’s Hydrographic Office has considerable data on what exists on the seabed, so we are not devoid of some appreciation of the size of the task. The National Monuments Record, which is part of English Heritage, is also looking at the question of marine data. However, my noble friend is quite right. There is considerable work to be done and it is expected that, under the new operations of the Marine Management Organisation and English Heritage, working practices will be established to guarantee the outcomes that my noble friend wishes to see.
My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend for raising this question, which is important in the context of the establishment of the Marine Management Organisation and the work that has to be done in implementing the Act, which came into force last year. The MoD’s Hydrographic Office has considerable data on what exists on the seabed, so we are not devoid of some appreciation of the size of the task. The National Monuments Record, which is part of English Heritage, is also looking at the question of marine data. However, my noble friend is quite right. There is considerable work to be done and it is expected that, under the new operations of the Marine Management Organisation and English Heritage, working practices will be established to guarantee the outcomes that my noble friend wishes to see.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Asked by
Lord Howarth of Newport
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, given the importance of historic sites in waters beyond 12 miles, ranging from the newly discovered HMS "Victory" to whole submerged landscapes, given the threat of commercial looting of historic wrecks and given the duty that Parliament has laid on the new Marine Management Organisation to take account of sites of historic and archaeological interest in the marine environment, as well as the requirement that environmental impact assessments should be produced where developments such as offshore wind farms are proposed, how will the Government ensure that the necessary historic and archaeological information is systematically archived and expert advice is made available to ensure that this marine heritage is properly considered and protected?
Subjects
Cultural heritage; Protection; Seas and oceans; Wrecks
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1547
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what plans they have to strengthen protection of cultural heritage assets in waters beyond 12 nautical miles offshore.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what plans they have to strengthen protection of cultural heritage assets in waters beyond 12 nautical miles offshore.
Asked by
Lord Howarth of Newport
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
4 March 2010
Answered on
4 March 2010
My Lords, the Government are continuing to work on implementing the provisions of the Marine and Coastal Access Act. We are looking at options for strengthening protection of significant underwater cultural heritage assets beyond territorial waters. We are observing how signatories of the 2001 Convention on Underwater Cultural Heritage go about implementing it. We support the principles of the annexe of the convention in respect of best practice and treatment of underwater cultural heritage.
Subjects
Cultural heritage; Protection; Seas and oceans; Wrecks
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1547
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the recent public consultation on coastal protection schemes will be extended to cover all localities where the public has made suggestions.
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the recent public consultation on coastal protection schemes will be extended to cover all localities where the public has made suggestions.
Asked by
Lord Dykes
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Answered on
10 December 2009
High-level strategies for managing coastal flood and erosion risk are set out in shoreline management plans (SMPs), with detailed consideration of different options for managing the coast provided in coastal strategies.
A rolling review of SMPs covering the whole of England and Wales is currently underway. Local authorities and the Environment Agency are reviewing each of the 22 SMPs and a significant part of this process is a three-month public consultation.
Coastal strategies are the next stage and look at shorter sections of coast in more detail than the SMPs. The strategies consider different options for managing the coast and are subject to significant public consultation. This provides the public with the opportunity to make suggestions and discuss the issues and proposals in more detail.
Subjects
Coastal areas; Coastal erosion; Flood control; Protection; Public consultation
Date
10 December 2009
Reference
497; 715 c145WA
House
House of Lords
To ask Her Majesty’s Government further to the Written Answers by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 11 May (WA 173–74) and 1 June (WA 55), what action they will take to enable responsible organisations and individuals to appeal to the Secretary of State against refusals by local highway authorities...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government further to the Written Answers by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 11 May (WA 173–74) and 1 June (WA 55), what action they will take to enable responsible organisations and individuals to appeal to the Secretary of State against refusals by local highway authorities...
Asked by
Lord Bradshaw
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Answered on
1 July 2009
There are no plans to amend the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 to provide for a right to appeal to the Secretary of State against a refusal by a local highway authority to make a traffic regulation order. To do so would risk imposing a significant new regulatory and financial burden upon those authorities. Local highway authorities are best placed to judge whether a traffic regulation order would be appropriate in any given circumstances. If an individual wishes to challenge the decision of a local highway authority not to make a traffic regulation order he or she can do so by way of an application for judicial review.
Subjects
Appeals; Damage; Motor vehicles; Protection; Rights of way; Road traffic control
Date
1 July 2009
Reference
4532; 712 c64WA
House
House of Lords
To ask Her Majesty's Government what action they are taking to ensure that material found on and information relevant to archaeological sites where the developer goes into receivership is safeguarded and the ownership secured for the public benefit.
To ask Her Majesty's Government what action they are taking to ensure that material found on and information relevant to archaeological sites where the developer goes into receivership is safeguarded and the ownership secured for the public benefit.
Asked by
Lord Clement-Jones
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Answered on
23 June 2009
We are aware of concerns that archaeological material may be lost as a result of developers' difficulties. However, we believe those in the archaeological sector are best placed to deal with the issue of safeguarding such material.
The Government's statutory adviser on the historic environment, English Heritage, is liaising with the Institute for Archaeologists and the Federation of Archaeological Managers and Employers on issuing advice to financial administrators about the cultural value of archaeological archives. English Heritage is carrying out a scoping project to try to define the scale of the problem and what it can do to help and expects to have the results in August. However, there are issues of legal responsibilities related to planning consents to take into consideration, where it would not be appropriate for English Heritage or central government to intervene.
Subjects
Archaeological sites; Insolvency; Protection; Property development
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
3941; 711 c263WA
House
House of Lords
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they plan to improve detection of vessels in the territorial waters of St Helena in order to better protect local fisheries in line with the detection system in operation in the Falkland Islands.
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they plan to improve detection of vessels in the territorial waters of St Helena in order to better protect local fisheries in line with the detection system in operation in the Falkland Islands.
Asked by
Lord Jones of Cheltenham
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Answered on
2 March 2009
The Government advise the St Helena Government on measures which may be introduced to improve detection of vessels in the island's territorial waters and to combat illegal fishing. Such measures are proportionate to the scale of fishing activities in St Helena's waters. However, responsibility for the introduction of any measures rests with the St Helena Government. Unlike in the Falkland Islands, fishing in St Helena waters is artisanal and generates minimal income for St Helena.
Subjects
Fisheries; Protection; St Helena
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
1235; 708 c126WA
House
House of Lords
To ask Her Majesty's Government further to the Written Answer by Lord Malloch-Brown on 27 January (HL175), whether they will formally raise with the Government of Pakistan the protection of prisoners accused under blasphemy legislation.
To ask Her Majesty's Government further to the Written Answer by Lord Malloch-Brown on 27 January (HL175), whether they will formally raise with the Government of Pakistan the protection of prisoners accused under blasphemy legislation.
Asked by
Lord Patten
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Answered on
11 February 2009
There are no plans to specifically raise the protection of prisoners accused under blasphemy legislation with the Government of Pakistan.
Officials in London and Islamabad regularly meet with representatives of civil society and human rights organisations to monitor the treatment of minorities including those charged with offences under blasphemy legislation. The protection of prisoners has not been raised during these discussions and no cases have been brought to our attention. We will take this up in discussions with human rights organisations to establish whether there are any prisoners who are at particular risk.
We continue to take opportunities to share UK best practice with prison authorities in Pakistan as part of our wider co-operation with the Government of Pakistan and to ensure that prison standards for all prisoners are in accordance with international human rights standards.
Subjects
Blasphemy; Protection; Prisoners; Pakistan; Religious freedom
Date
11 February 2009
Reference
707 c199-200WA; 1094
House
House of Lords
Whether Northern Rock bond investments are covered by the Treasury as with other public institutions.
Whether Northern Rock bond investments are covered by the Treasury as with other public institutions.
Asked by
Lord Barnett
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Answered on
14 October 2008
The Treasury's guarantee arrangements for Northern Rock plc apply to certain retail and wholesale deposits. Details of the guarantee arrangements are set out in Treasury press notices published last year on 20 and 21 September, 9 and 11 October and 18 December.
As announced on 11 October 2007 the guarantee arrangements for Northern Rock supplement and do not replace any compensation provided by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, which the Financial Services Authority has recently extended to cover 100 per cent of the first £50,000 of deposits.
Subjects
Bank services; Protection; Northern Rock
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
5333; 704 c46-7WA
House
House of Lords
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether deposits with Northern Rock are covered by the same guarantee provided to other banks; and
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether deposits with Northern Rock are covered by the same guarantee provided to other banks; and
Asked by
Lord Barnett
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Answered on
14 October 2008
The Treasury's guarantee arrangements for Northern Rock plc apply to certain retail and wholesale deposits. Details of the guarantee arrangements are set out in Treasury press notices published last year on 20 and 21 September, 9 and 11 October and 18 December.
As announced on 11 October 2007 the guarantee arrangements for Northern Rock supplement and do not replace any compensation provided by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, which the Financial Services Authority has recently extended to cover 100 per cent of the first £50,000 of deposits.
Subjects
Bank services; Protection; Northern Rock
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
5332; 704 c46-7WA
House
House of Lords
My Lords, decisions on mergers are generally taken by the competition authorities based on whether there is a substantial lessening of competition. This generally provides the most effective method of protecting consumers. In this particular case, and in the light of the extraordinary stress in world financial markets, the Secretary of State considered that there was urgent need for additional action. He therefore laid an order in the House on 7 October that will enable him to take the final decisions in this case and allow him to consider effects relating to the stability of the UK financial system alongside any competition issues.
My Lords, decisions on mergers are generally taken by the competition authorities based on whether there is a substantial lessening of competition. This generally provides the most effective method of protecting consumers. In this particular case, and in the light of the extraordinary stress in world financial markets, the Secretary of State considered that there was urgent need for additional action. He therefore laid an order in the House on 7 October that will enable him to take the final decisions in this case and allow him to consider effects relating to the stability of the UK financial system alongside any competition issues.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Asked by
Baroness Kingsmill
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
To ask Her Majesty’ Government what steps they will take to protect consumers in the event of a merger between Lloyds-TSB and HBOS.
Subjects
Consumers; Banks; Competition; Protection; Mergers; Lloyds TSB; HBOS
Date
8 October 2008
Reference
704 c234-5
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend for her opening remarks. On consumer protection, as well as the other emergency measures we have taken in the past few days, the Government are about to introduce the Banking Bill, which will reconstitute the regulation of the banking system. The interests of consumers and taxpayers will form an important part of that Bill. As the House will recognise, the Bill has been introduced in the other place and will come before this House in the not too distant future.
My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend for her opening remarks. On consumer protection, as well as the other emergency measures we have taken in the past few days, the Government are about to introduce the Banking Bill, which will reconstitute the regulation of the banking system. The interests of consumers and taxpayers will form an important part of that Bill. As the House will recognise, the Bill has been introduced in the other place and will come before this House in the not too distant future.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Asked by
Baroness Kingsmill
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, I thank my noble friend for that reply. Obviously, in these times of trouble in the banking community, stability should come first. However, does he agree that the proposed merged group will have a very dominant position in the British banking scene, holding as it will more than 30 per cent of the current accounts in the UK? What measures do the Government feel they should introduce for the longer term to protect consumers’ interests?
Subjects
Consumers; Banks; Competition; Protection; Mergers; Lloyds TSB; HBOS
Date
8 October 2008
Reference
704 c235
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the Chancellor’s Statement, made earlier in the other place, answers a great number of these questions. The noble Lord will have a chance to question that Statement very shortly. The issues that he raised were exactly those which have exercised the Government.
My Lords, the Chancellor’s Statement, made earlier in the other place, answers a great number of these questions. The noble Lord will have a chance to question that Statement very shortly. The issues that he raised were exactly those which have exercised the Government.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Asked by
Lord Razzall
(Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, I am sure that the Minister will accept that today’s events mean that things have rather moved on since the HBOS/Lloyds proposed merger. Does he accept that we are looking to the Government for a clear statement on two fundamental issues of policy? First, what conditions will the Government impose on banks that receive capital from the taxpayer to ensure that the money is spent for the benefit of customers and consumers? Secondly, does he accept that the wider government announcement today will inevitably lead to some suspension of competitive protection for consumers? Without wishing to press the Minister for the detail of government policy on this topic, will he undertake to make a statement to the House shortly?
Subjects
Consumers; Banks; Competition; Protection; Mergers; Lloyds TSB; HBOS
Date
8 October 2008
Reference
704 c236
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the Banking Bill has been the subject of very extensive consultation, and so it should be for a measure of such supreme importance to the British economy and the British people. I note that the noble Lord sustains his critical stance on the government action on Northern Rock. Others will think that the Government acted entirely appropriately. But all, even he, will rejoice in the fact that Northern Rock is beginning to pay back, ahead of time, its debts owed to the Government.
My Lords, the Banking Bill has been the subject of very extensive consultation, and so it should be for a measure of such supreme importance to the British economy and the British people. I note that the noble Lord sustains his critical stance on the government action on Northern Rock. Others will think that the Government acted entirely appropriately. But all, even he, will rejoice in the fact that Northern Rock is beginning to pay back, ahead of time, its debts owed to the Government.
Answered by
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
Asked by
Lord Bilimoria
(Crossbench)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, there is a saying that good judgment comes from experience and experience comes from bad judgment. What lessons have the Government learnt from the nationalisation of Northern Rock—which, after five months of indecisiveness, was nationalised in a rushed-through manner in three days? Here we are eight months later: we have no permanent major reform to the Bank of England, which is desperately needed.
Subjects
Consumers; Banks; Competition; Protection; Mergers; Lloyds TSB; HBOS
Date
8 October 2008
Reference
704 c235
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords