1-20 of 34 results for dept:"Ministry of Defence"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.244 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.015 seconds
- Search query
- dept:"Ministry of Defence"
- We searched for
- department_t:"Ministry of Defence" OR department_t:MOD OR department_ses:45998 OR answeringDept_ses:45998
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much his Department spent on the Defence and Security Equipment International Conference held in September 2015.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much his Department spent on the Defence and Security Equipment International Conference held in September 2015.
Defence and Security Equipment International (DSEI) is an important event which supports the UK defence industry seeking to trade internationally and offers valuable defence engagement opportunities with our allies and partners. The support to DSEI 2015 was delivered through the course of normal departmental business and in-line with existing budgetary provisions. Any additional costs were recouped in line with standard practices
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what estimate he has made of the cost to his Department of the Farnborough International Airshow due to take place in July 2016.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what estimate he has made of the cost to his Department of the Farnborough International Airshow due to take place in July 2016.
Farnborough International Air Show is an important event which supports UK defence industry seeking to trade internationally and offers valuable defence engagement opportunities with our allies and partners. The support to the Farnborough International Air Show 2016 will be delivered through the course of normal departmental business and in-line with existing budgetary provisions. Any additional costs will be recouped in line with standard practices.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many (a) AWE personnel and (b) contractors are working on legacy decommissioning projects at the Atomic Weapons Establishment.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many (a) AWE personnel and (b) contractors are working on legacy decommissioning projects at the Atomic Weapons Establishment.
There are 209 contractors and 78 AWE personnel working on decommissioning projects, including demolition, at the Atomic Weapons Establishment
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the most recent estimate is that his Department has made of (a) civilian public sector, (b) civilian private sector and (c) military personnel working (i) directly on and (ii) in the supply chain of the Trident nuclear weapon system.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the most recent estimate is that his Department has made of (a) civilian public sector, (b) civilian private sector and (c) military personnel working (i) directly on and (ii) in the supply chain of the Trident nuclear weapon system.
The nuclear deterrent is the cornerstone of the UK’s defence security policy. Maintaining the UK’s defence nuclear enterprise supports over 30,000 jobs across the UK and makes a significant contribution to the economy.
In the UK, four key suppliers directly support the delivery of the Trident programme. The Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) managed and operated by AWE Management Limited is based in Aldermaston and Burghfield; BAE Systems Maritime-Submarines at Barrow-in-Furness; Babcock at Devonport; and Rolls-Royce at Raynesway, Derby. There are thousands of jobs sustained across these sites.
There are also 6,800 Ministry of Defence (MOD) civilian and Royal Navy jobs at Her Majesty’s Naval Base Clyde including contractors from Babcock, Lockheed Martin UK and Rolls-Royce. This figure is due to grow to 8,200 in the 2020s. Rolls-Royce also operate the site at the Vulcan Naval Reactor Test Establishment, Dounreay, supporting the Trident programme and other nuclear-powered submarines. Also the Defence Equipment and Support’s military and defence civilian personnel are based at MOD Abbey Wood and other sites in the UK.
The ability of these key areas to deliver their programmes depends heavily on an extensive network of sub-contractors who are working indirectly in support of the Trident programme.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the most recent estimate is that his Department has made of (a) civilian public sector, (b) civilian private sector and (c) military personnel working (i) directly on and (ii) in the supply chain of the Successor submarine programme.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the most recent estimate is that his Department has made of (a) civilian public sector, (b) civilian private sector and (c) military personnel working (i) directly on and (ii) in the supply chain of the Successor submarine programme.
The nuclear deterrent is the cornerstone of the UK’s defence security policy. Maintaining the UK’s defence nuclear enterprise supports over 30,000 jobs across the UK and makes a significant contribution to the economy.
In the UK, four key suppliers directly support the delivery of the Trident programme. The Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) managed and operated by AWE Management Limited is based in Aldermaston and Burghfield; BAE Systems Maritime-Submarines at Barrow-in-Furness; Babcock at Devonport; and Rolls-Royce at Raynesway, Derby. There are thousands of jobs sustained across these sites.
There are also 6,800 Ministry of Defence (MOD) civilian and Royal Navy jobs at Her Majesty’s Naval Base Clyde including contractors from Babcock, Lockheed Martin UK and Rolls-Royce. This figure is due to grow to 8,200 in the 2020s. Rolls-Royce also operate the site at the Vulcan Naval Reactor Test Establishment, Dounreay, supporting the Trident programme and other nuclear-powered submarines. Also the Defence Equipment and Support’s military and defence civilian personnel are based at MOD Abbey Wood and other sites in the UK.
The ability of these key areas to deliver their programmes depends heavily on an extensive network of sub-contractors who are working indirectly in support of the Trident programme.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much his Department spent on the NATO Ballistic Missile Defence network in each of the last five years; and how much it plans to spend on that network in each of the next five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much his Department spent on the NATO Ballistic Missile Defence network in each of the last five years; and how much it plans to spend on that network in each of the next five years.
The UK's contribution to the NATO Ballistic Missile Defence network for future years will form part of our contribution to NATO in accordance with our agreed cost share. As outlined in the SDSR, we will support research, development initiatives and multinational engagement through the UK's Missile Defence Centre. The specific expenditure for the years requested has not yet been identified
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to paragraph 4.16 of the National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015, where the ground-based Ballistic Missile Defence radar will be based; and when that radar will enter operation.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to paragraph 4.16 of the National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015, where the ground-based Ballistic Missile Defence radar will be based; and when that radar will enter operation.
We have not yet made decisions as to the exact capabilities required of the radar or where it will be sited - this will be determined in due course.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what briefing his Department provided to His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales on (a) the promotion and sale of arms and military equipment and (b) human rights before his trip to the Middle East; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what briefing his Department provided to His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales on (a) the promotion and sale of arms and military equipment and (b) human rights before his trip to the Middle East; and if he will make a statement.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by the Minister for the Middle East at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Tobias Ellwood) to Question 224052.
Thirteenth opposition day debate, on a motion in the name of the Leader of the second largest opposition party (SNP), Plaid Cymru and the Green party. Closure motion. Agreed to on question. Main question negatived on division (37 to 364 - Corrected on 21 January from 35 to 364).
Thirteenth opposition day debate, on a motion in the name of the Leader of the second largest opposition party (SNP), Plaid Cymru and the Green party. Closure motion. Agreed to on question. Main question negatived on division (37 to 364 - Corrected on 21 January from 35 to 364).
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, who the heads are of the (a) Saudi Arabia National Guard Communications Project and (b) Ministry of Defence Saudi Armed Forces Project.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, who the heads are of the (a) Saudi Arabia National Guard Communications Project and (b) Ministry of Defence Saudi Armed Forces Project.
The Saudi Arabia National Guard Communications Project Programme Director is Brigadier Tim Watts. The Director, Saudi Armed Forces Projects is
Air Vice-Marshal Ian C Morrison CBE.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many (a) civilian staff of his Department based in the UK, (b) military personnel based in the UK, (c) civilian staff of his Department based in Saudi Arabia and (d) military personnel based in Saudi Arabia were employed by the (i)...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many (a) civilian staff of his Department based in the UK, (b) military personnel based in the UK, (c) civilian staff of his Department based in Saudi Arabia and (d) military personnel based in Saudi Arabia were employed by the (i)...
The number of civilian and military staff based in the UK and in Saudi Arabia working on both the Saudi Arabian National Guard Communications (SANGCOM) Project and the Ministry of Defence (MOD) Saudi Armed Forces Projects (MODSAP) on 1 April 2014 is shown in the table. The Saudi Arabian government reimburses the UK MOD for these staff costs and there is, therefore, no cost to the UK taxpayer.
Manpower number as at 1 April 2014 | SANGCOM Project | MODSAP |
UK-based Civilian Staff | 1 | 69 |
UK-based Military Staff | 0 | 42 |
Saudi Arabia-based Civilian Staff | 28 | 32 |
Saudi Arabia-based Military Staff | 20 | 50 |
The function of the SANGCOM Project is to support the United Kingdom’s commitment to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia by acquiring and supporting modern communications capabilities for the Saudi Arabian National Guard.
The function of the Ministry of Defence Saudi Armed Forces Projects is to support the United Kingdom’s commitment to the defence of Saudi Arabia through the supply of modern military aircraft, naval vessels, weapons and associated support services to the Saudi Armed Forces.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence for what reasons a review of the scope of Project Pegasus is being undertaken at the Atomic Weapons Establishment; and what changes he expects to be made to the scope of the project as a result of the review.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence for what reasons a review of the scope of Project Pegasus is being undertaken at the Atomic Weapons Establishment; and what changes he expects to be made to the scope of the project as a result of the review.
Pegasus is the replacement highly enriched uranium component manufacturing and storage facility, and forms part of the Government’s programme of investment in the Atomic Weapons Establishment sites.
In accordance with normal industry best practice, the project is under regular review to ensure that the facility will meet the Ministry of Defence’s requirements while also achieving the optimum balance of performance, cost and schedule. No changes to the approved scope of the project have been made.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence with reference to the answer of 22 November 2011, Official Report, column 272W, on AWE, what his most recent estimate is of the (a) anticipated out-turn cost and (b) projected in-service date of each of the new build projects in the Atomic...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence with reference to the answer of 22 November 2011, Official Report, column 272W, on AWE, what his most recent estimate is of the (a) anticipated out-turn cost and (b) projected in-service date of each of the new build projects in the Atomic...
The following tables show the current new build projects, with approved costs and in-service dates, at the Atomic Weapons Establishment.
Projected in-service dates are shown in bandings to avoid prejudice to national security and defence. No costs are attributed to projects detailed in table 2 as these have yet to be approved.
| Table
1: Current new build projects that have been through the Ministry of
Defence approval
process | |||
| Ongoing
projects | Function | Projected
in-service
period | Approved
cost
(£million) |
| Conventional
Manufacturing—Phoenix | Manufacturing/production | 2014-15 | 57 |
| Hydrodynamics
trials—Technology Development
Centre | Testing/research | 2014-15 | 40 |
| High
Explosives
fabrication—Circinus | Manufacturing/Production | 2014-15 | 231 |
| Warhead
assembly/disassembly—Mensa | Manufacturing/production | 2016-20 | 734 |
| Uranium
components—Pegasus | Manufacturing/production | 2016-20 | 634 |
| Table
2: Projects currently planned for but which have yet to go through the
formal Ministry of Defence approvals
process | ||
| Ongoing
projects | Function | Projected
in-service
period |
| Salts
Processing—Octans | Testing/research | 2020-25 |
| Initiator
system
manufacture—Taurus | Manufacturing/production | 2020-25 |
| Large
Scale
formulations—Scorpius | Manufacturing/production | 2025-30 |
| Small
Scale
formulations—Cepheus | Manufacturing/production | 2025-30 |
| New
Plutonium (Pu) Facility—not yet
named | Manufacturing/production | 2025-30 |
| New
depleted Uranium
Facility | Manufacturing/production | 2025-30 |
| Assembly
for
Trials—Columba | Testing/research | 2025-30 |
| High
Explosive Climatic
Trials | Testing/research | 2025-30 |
| Non-Metallics
and materials
R&D—Libra | Testing/research | 2025-30 |
| Chemical
processing—Astra | Manufacturing/production | 2025-30 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans he has for reviewing the conduct of and representation on local liaison committees for defence nuclear sites.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans he has for reviewing the conduct of and representation on local liaison committees for defence nuclear sites.
There are no plans for the Ministry of Defence to review the conduct of, nor representation at, local liaison committees relating to defence nuclear sites. The operation of such committees is a matter for agreement between the individual site operator (the licensee and/or authorisee) and the appropriate local authorities.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if his Department will abandon the use of live pigs in military battlefield exercises; whether he has had discussions with his counterpart in Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Poland to learn from their use of mannequins as a replacement; and if he...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if his Department will abandon the use of live pigs in military battlefield exercises; whether he has had discussions with his counterpart in Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Poland to learn from their use of mannequins as a replacement; and if he...
As a key element in their training for operational deployment, members of the UK Defence Medical Services attend military Exercise Surgical Training courses in Denmark.
These exercises are essential to ensure our medical personnel are capable of carrying out potentially life-saving surgery on casualties with serious bullet and blast wounds. Injuries of such severity are not routinely encountered during their clinical practice in NHS hospitals, but they are regularly required to treat them when on operational deployment. Participating in Danish training minimises the number of animals involved. The pigs are treated humanely with full use of anaesthetics.
There are a number of sophisticated simulation models on the market that provide effective training in certain surgical techniques, and the Ministry of Defence already uses these where clinically appropriate. However, none of those currently available provide a viable alternative to the serious bullet and blast wound training that our surgeons receive from live pig models.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans his Department has for the A91 facility at Atomic Weapons Establishment Aldermaston; what the currently calculated write-off costs for that facility are; what lessons learned review was conducted by his Department following the decision not to bring A91 into service;...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans his Department has for the A91 facility at Atomic Weapons Establishment Aldermaston; what the currently calculated write-off costs for that facility are; what lessons learned review was conducted by his Department following the decision not to bring A91 into service;...
The A91 facility at the Atomic Weapons Establishment was designed to house a Radioactive Liquid Effluent Treatment Plant (RALETP). The contract
for the construction of the facility was originally let in the late 1970s and it was intended to become operational in 1991. Following the detection of corrosion, the works were formally rejected in 2000.
The Ministry of Defence wrote off the costs of the facility over two financial years. In 2002-3 it wrote off £82 million in respect of the RALETP and in 2003-4 it wrote off £65 million for the A91 building itself.
A final decision has yet to be made on the future of the A91 facility.
A post project evaluation was conducted in 2004-5 from which a lessons learned report, dated May 2005 was produced. The key lessons learned were published by the Defence Select committee in 2006 and can be found at the following link:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmdfence/1293/129302.htm
The full document will be considered for publication in the Library of the House, taking account of whether any information should be withheld, consistent with the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when decommissioning of the A1 facility at the Atomic Weapons Establishment Aldermaston is scheduled to (a) commence and (b) finish; and what the anticipated cost is of decommissioning that facility.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when decommissioning of the A1 facility at the Atomic Weapons Establishment Aldermaston is scheduled to (a) commence and (b) finish; and what the anticipated cost is of decommissioning that facility.
Work commenced on decommissioning the A1 facility in 2004 and is due to finish in 2030. The anticipated cost is estimated to be between £130 million and £150 million.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the timetable is for his planned renewal in 2014 of the 1958 US-UK Mutual Defence Agreement; and what steps have been taken to facilitate renewal of that agreement to date.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the timetable is for his planned renewal in 2014 of the 1958 US-UK Mutual Defence Agreement; and what steps have been taken to facilitate renewal of that agreement to date.
Work is under way in the UK and US to amend the treaty by the end of 2014.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence on what date the next Stocktake meeting between the Government and the US Administration under the 1958 Mutual Defence Agreement is scheduled to take place; and where that meeting will be held.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence on what date the next Stocktake meeting between the Government and the US Administration under the 1958 Mutual Defence Agreement is scheduled to take place; and where that meeting will be held.
A Stocktake meeting took place at the Atomic Weapons Establishment, Aldermaston, on 16 January 2014. The date and venue for the next meeting have not yet been set. Stocktake meetings are nominally annual, hosted equitably by the US and UK.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the oral answer of 2 September 2013, Official Report, column 19, on what date it was considered that the sodium fluoride and potassium fluoride could be precursors in some other application; what these applications were considered to be; for what...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the oral answer of 2 September 2013, Official Report, column 19, on what date it was considered that the sodium fluoride and potassium fluoride could be precursors in some other application; what these applications were considered to be; for what...
Export licences are approved by the Department for Business Innovation and Skills.
The two standard individual export licences for sodium fluoride and potassium fluoride were revoked following a revision to the sanctions regime which came into force in June 2012. The revision introduced new prohibitions on certain chemicals, including sodium fluoride and potassium fluoride. In these cases the chemicals were to be used for metal finishing of aluminium showers and windows. There was no evidence at the time of granting the licences—and there has been no evidence subsequently—to suggest that the end-use was anything other than stated. Our system of export controls is robust, responsive and effective in protecting our interests and upholding the highest international standards.
The licences were not used before they were revoked.