Skip to main content

1-13 of 13 results for subject:Taliban

Answering member X
Baroness Goldie

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Goldie, Baroness (13)
More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what military equipment provided by the United Kingdom to Afghanistan is now in the hands of the Taliban; and what estimate they have made of the number of soldiers fighting for the Taliban who were trained by British instructors.

Asked by
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
16 September 2021
Reference
814 cc1519-1522
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the fluid and uncertain situation on the ground across Afghanistan means that there is no complete assessment of the matériel and equipment that the UK provided to the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces, which are now in the hands of the Taliban. The vast majority of the equipment provided comprises non-lethal support. We estimate the current strength of the Taliban to be between 35,000 and 75,000. It is not possible to estimate whether any British-trained Afghan National Defense and Security Forces personnel have joined the Taliban.

Answered by
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 September 2021
Reference
814 c1519
House
House of Lords

I do not have the precise information about the value of kit that over the years was handed to the Afghan national security forces. In so far as a limited amount of government equipment

was left, some was handed over to our American allies, but no equipment of any military use has been left that may fall into other hands.

Answered by
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 September 2021
Reference
814 c1519
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord makes an important point that this is broader than the United Kingdom. As the Chamber will understand, the NATO alliance activity in Afghanistan—obviously by implication of what it was doing—raised an inevitable risk; do you help and try to support, which includes providing equipment? You cannot have a crystal ball to see into the future. As I said earlier, when it became clear the Taliban were taking control of Afghanistan and an evacuation plan had to be conceived, careful thought was given to controlling what was under our control, and that was the equipment that we had. I have explained the situation in relation to that.

Answered by
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 September 2021
Reference
814 c1520
House
House of Lords

With all respect to the noble Lord, I do not recognise what he describes. I think we are all united in support, admiration and respect for what our troops did, as the noble Lord, Lord Browne, said, within the NATO operation in Afghanistan. We owe a huge debt of gratitude to the people who served in Afghanistan—150,000 of them—in particular the 457 who lost their lives and those who sustained life-changing injuries. They have achieved improvements and change in Afghanistan that would not otherwise have been possible and I think we should celebrate that.

Answered by
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 September 2021
Reference
814 c1520
House
House of Lords

I share my noble friend’s concern about the ideology, as I think everyone else will in this Chamber. Along with our allies and friends, significantly, the United States, we act to try to uphold values, protect freedoms and assist those who find themselves oppressed and isolated. We act to try to minimise threats to this country and our partners. That was one of the reasons we engaged in the NATO alliance in Afghanistan.

Answered by
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 September 2021
Reference
814 c1521
House
House of Lords

I do not share the noble Lord’s analysis, and I do not share his conclusion based on his analysis. As I said earlier, a very small amount of equipment was left behind. Some of that was gifted to partner nations and therefore is under their control. Anything else that was left—and it was a very small amount—was of no military use whatsoever.

Answered by
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 September 2021
Reference
814 c1521
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness raises an important point. As she will be aware, we have made it clear that ARAP extends to all who worked with us. It is a scheme without a time limit, and we invite people to continue applying. In so far as British nationals are concerned, we have endeavoured to find where they are and maintain contact with them. We are doing our level best to support that. As the noble Baroness will understand, this is a difficult situation. The advice we have given to anyone wanting to try and get out who is either a British national or eligible under ARAP is to try and make their way to a neighbouring country. That is the best advice we can give. I reassure the House that we are supporting that advice by providing additional staff in neighbouring countries.

Answered by
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 September 2021
Reference
814 c1521
House
House of Lords

I am sure my noble friend sitting beside me has as acute hearing as I have, has listened carefully to the noble Lord and will find his own way of responding appropriately to the noble Lord’s concerns.

Answered by
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 September 2021
Reference
814 c1522
House
House of Lords

Obviously, the situation is constantly under review by us and our international partners and friends, not least within the United Nations. But this is a very difficult situation on the ground and that is a reality we are having to deal with.

Answered by
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 September 2021
Reference
814 c1522
House
House of Lords

I think there is little I can add, in response to the noble Lord, to what I have already said. As the noble Lord, Lord Browne, astutely identified, this is a broader challenge than the United Kingdom; it is a NATO challenge. It is part of engaging in conflict that certain risks have to be taken; otherwise, we would never seek to intervene in any way whatsoever —and that is an unacceptable premise. What we have done in Afghanistan in co-operation with our NATO allies, we have done as responsibly as we can, and we have endeavoured to ensure as we left Afghanistan that we did not leave a legacy of equipment with military potential.

Answered by
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 September 2021
Reference
814 c1522
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of reports that Taliban fighters killed Afghan commandos who had surrendered.

Asked by
Lord McCrea of Magherafelt and Cookstown (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 2021
Reference
HL2033
House
House of Lords

Lords question for short debate on what plans they have to review United Kingdom assistance to Afghanistan; and what assessment they have made of the prospects for peace in that country.

Lead member
Baroness D'Souza
Answering member
Baroness Goldie
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
4 September 2018
Reference
792 cc1768-1784
House
House of Lords