Skip to main content

1-20 of 204 results for house:"House of Lords"

Answering member X
Baroness Hollis of Heigham
Year X
2002

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More
Hollis of Heigham, Baroness (204)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Whether the Department for Work and Pensions is within its right to encourage claimants to open accounts with high street banks, rather than the Post Office card account; and whether they still plan to offer the Post Office card account, which used to be called the universal bank, or whether...

Asked by
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 2002
Reference
HL 453; 642 c110-1WA
House
House of Lords

Whether they are concerned that benefit claimants may be refused basic high street accounts. [HL 456].

Asked by
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 2002
Reference
HL 456; 642 c111-2WA
House
House of Lords

To what address the Department for Work and Pensions writes with information regarding pensions and benefit when a person has been in hospital for more than six weeks. [HL 660].

Asked by
Baroness Greengross (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 2002
Reference
HL 660; 642 c112WA
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on what the outcome was of the Employment and Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council held in Brussels on 3 December; and what their stance was on the issues discussed including its voting record. [HL 810].

Asked by
Lord Hoyle (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 2002
Reference
HL 810; 642 c112-3WA
House
House of Lords

What recent assessment the Department for Work and Pensions has made of the facilities offered by Rehab UK at its Tyne and Wear Brain Injury Centre; and with what result. [HL 505].

Asked by
Lord Corbett of Castle Vale (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 December 2002
Reference
642 c97WA; HL 505
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 December 2002
Reference
642 c372-3
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 December 2002
Reference
642 c373
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 December 2002
Reference
642 c374
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 December 2002
Reference
642 c373
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 December 2002
Reference
642 c373-4
House
House of Lords
Whether the winter fuel payment has been extended to any other groups of people in the past two years; if so, to whom; and whether they intend to extend it further in the next two years, and, if so, to whom.
Asked by
Lord Ashley of Stoke (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
12 December 2002
Reference
642 c372-3
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 December 2002
Reference
642 c372-3
House
House of Lords

What recent representations the Dept for Work and Pensions has received from Rehab UK about the future of its Tyne and Wear Brain Injury Centre; and what action they are taking. [HL 270].

Asked by
Lord Morris of Manchester (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2002
Reference
HL 270; 642 c33WA
House
House of Lords

Control of Asbestos at Work Regulations (SI 2002/2675). Lords debate on motion that an Humble Address be presented to Her Majesty praying that the order be annulled. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Earl of Onslow
Answering member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Parliamentary proceedings
Date
5 December 2002
Reference
641 c1234-60
House
House of Lords

Further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hollis of Heigham on 25 November, 641 c25-6WA, whether there is any logical principle capable of distinguishing between the agreement on pensions reached with the former Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia in 1959 and that reached with Canada in 1960. [HL 307].

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 December 2002
Reference
HL 307; 641 c114-5WA
House
House of Lords

What percentage of disabled children currently living at home could be classified as children living in poverty. [HL 8]. - Includes figures and ref to Opportunity for All - Fourth Annual Report (CM 5598) and Households Below Average Income 1994-95-2000-01 (thirteenth edition), copies in Library.

Asked by
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 December 2002
Reference
HL 8; 641 c114WA
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on what changes are proposed to the Department for Work and Pensions expenditure limit and administration costs limit. [HL 299]. - Inc table.

Asked by
Lord Peston (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 November 2002
Reference
HL 299; 641 c50-4WA
House
House of Lords

How and when it came about that British subjects resident in former Yugoslavia are entitled to annual uprating of their state pensions while British subjects resident in Canada are not; and what is the logical principle which justifies the difference between the treatment of British subjects to former Yugoslavia and...

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 November 2002
Reference
641 c25-6WA; HL 12
House
House of Lords

Whether there should be a programme of research to provide an improved understanding of the relationship between economic activities and the creation of jobs in the Cumbrian economy. [HL 31].

Asked by
Lord Inglewood (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 November 2002
Reference
HL 31; 641 c14WA
House
House of Lords

Whether it is still the view, expressed in the Green paper 'Partnership in Pensions (1998)', that the balance spent on pensions by the state and private sectors will change from 60% state and 40% private to 40% state and 60% private. [HL 6105]. - Ref to 20 May 2002 at...

Asked by
Lord Higgins (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2002
Reference
640 c180WA; HL 6105
House
House of Lords