Skip to main content

1-20 of 20 results for subject:Peace

Answering member X
Lord Howell of Guildford

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Howell of Guildford, Lord (20)
More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, we are committed to the Olympic Truce’s ideals of conflict prevention and peace. In the case of Syria, the six-point plan of the joint special envoy, Kofi Annan, sets out clearly the steps to a ceasefire. This has not been implemented by the Syrian regime, despite its undertaking to do so. We are therefore pressing for full implementation of the Annan plan to stop the terrible violence in Syria and allow a Syrian-led political transition.

Answered by
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c9
House
House of Lords

Anyone applying to enter the United Kingdom is treated according to our Immigration Rules. If an individual is currently the subject of a European Union or UN travel ban, they will not be able to come to the Games. However, I emphasise that this is a matter that relates to individuals, not to teams generally, groups or nationalities. I repeat: accreditation to the Olympics will be refused to any individual who may present a safety or security risk, or whose presence at the Games or in the UK would not be conducive to the public good.

Answered by
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c9
House
House of Lords

My understanding was that it was the International Red Cross that raised the concept of civil war, although whether it is qualified to establish an accepted viewpoint is debatable. The British Government are looking at the issue in the light of what has been said and the continuing, horrific and totally unacceptable level of violence. I cannot say more than that at the moment. We have not reached a clear view on the point that my noble friend raised.

Answered by
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c9
House
House of Lords

I can understand the noble Baroness’s feelings. On the broad issue, Kofi Annan is now in Moscow pressing the Russians who—with the Chinese—are a key part of this story, so that we can move to a Chapter 7 UN resolution. As for safe havens, of course thought is being given to these matters, but the noble Baroness knows that for them to be policed and operated on Syrian soil means the involvement of personnel and conditions inside Syria which simply do not exist at the moment. They would involve much higher risks and many more dangers than we face even at present. As to safe havens, the authorities in Turkey have created some refugee havens and areas to which many people have crossed the border and entered. However, safe havens and corridors within Syria have been considered but are not a realistic possibility as we see it at the moment.

Answered by
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c10
House
House of Lords

First, I acknowledge and salute my noble friend Lord Bates’ work in promoting the Olympic Truce ideal, which is widely supported. Of course, the British Government took the lead in co-sponsoring UN Resolution 66/5 on, “Building a peaceful … world”. The question that my noble friend rightly poses, through some very creative thinking, is whether we could not somehow involve China and Russia in joint action to mount more pressure on Damascus—indeed, on both sides in Syria—to cease their appalling and violent activity. A short while ago my right honourable friend the Foreign Secretary agreed with Mr Lavrov, the Russian Foreign Minister, a joint statement on co-operation on the ideals of the Olympic Truce. There is a basis there for further discussion. I am also sure that Kofi Annan will be raising the matter in Moscow now while we are discussing it here. The basic ingredients are there for something along the lines that my noble friend mentioned. However, I

am afraid that it is a long haul ahead and there are many difficulties in the way. But the truce is a potential asset in trying to move forward and get a grip on this horrific situation in Syria.

Answered by
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 c10
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will propose within the United Nations that steps be taken to apply the Olympic Truce in Syria during at least the period of the 2012 Games, and if possible for the traditional 100 days.

Asked by
Lord Hylton (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
739 cc8-10
House
House of Lords
The Libya issue is going a bit further than this Question, but the Americans are playing an active part, as we know, in a whole range of areas in trying to bring some stability to a divided Libya. Other members of NATO are in constant dialogue and have been asked whether they will contribute. It is true that not every member of NATO is involved. There is the particular question of Turkey, which has not so far played a hard-power part in the NATO operation. At least this is a core of members in NATO and it is under NATO organisation as a whole, so it is working.
Answered by
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 April 2011
Reference
727 c232
House
House of Lords
As I said, I think the two things are complementary. I know that the noble Lord, who is a considerable expert on these issues, would not forget the role of the Council of Europe, originally set up at the instigation of this nation which took a lead, which has helped to bring values to whole European continent. All three institutions have made their mark.
Answered by
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 April 2011
Reference
727 c231-2
House
House of Lords
My Lords, both the European Union and NATO have made invaluable and complementary contributions to peace in Europe. We do not consider it appropriate to compare the two as they serve different functions. While NATO has ensured, and continues to ensure, our security, there is more to peace than just security. It requires stability, shared values, economic development and political co-operation. The European Union has contributed that. We firmly intend to remain an active and committed member of both.
Answered by
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 April 2011
Reference
727 c231
House
House of Lords
The noble Lord makes a number of points. It is certainly true that the United States is expecting the European Union to contribute more to the overall NATO scene as we are doing. This explains why the original worries of the United States about duplication and overlapping have evaporated and the EU and NATO are working very effectively together. The coalition Government believe that we should have a very positive role in the present European structure, in its reform and in meeting its future problems. However, there is a wider world as well, with which we have to connect, and many of these issues are not just American responsibilities or European responsibilities but global responsibilities requiring a global partnership.
Answered by
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 April 2011
Reference
727 c233-4
House
House of Lords
I agree with what the noble Lord, Lord Hannay, said, with great moderation, that a beauty contest between these organisations is rather pointless. All one wants to avoid is immoderate statements claiming perfection for one against the other. All these institutions have played their part. Occasionally some enthusiasts get a bit too outspoken on the part that one institution has played and that is the time for moderation.
Answered by
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 April 2011
Reference
727 c233
House
House of Lords
The short answer is that foreign ministers, including our own Secretary of State, the noble Baroness, Lady Ashton, and NATO leaders are on the case. There is pressure to try to make progress and overcome the particular problems that arose over the Cyprus-related issue of Turkey, with which the noble Lord is extremely familiar, which have slowed down the integration and co-operation. Even so, in areas such as the West Balkans, where Eurofor and KFOR are operating, they have worked very closely together, so at a practical level there has been progress but on the bigger issues, which tend to be the visible ones, I agree that it has been slow progress for precisely the reason I mentioned.
Answered by
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 April 2011
Reference
727 c232
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I think the noble Lord will agree that democracy is a many-layered concept. It requires the rule of law, good judicial standards, effective policing, fighting corruption, good and free business enterprise and freedom of the press. All those are areas where EU operations are effective. No one is saying that everything in the European Union is perfect at the moment. It obviously has major problems, particularly for those who are members of the eurozone, but it is unrealistic to dismiss all those very important elements of peace and democracy to which the EU contributes alongside the harder power that NATO can deliver.
Answered by
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 April 2011
Reference
727 c231
House
House of Lords
I think I heard a bit of immoderation the other way at that point. There is reason and sense in all these points of view and if anyone strives to go too far in claiming perfection for one organisation over the other it is bound to produce a reaction, which is just what we are hearing today.
Answered by
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 April 2011
Reference
727 c233
House
House of Lords
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the contribution by the European Union and its predecessors to peace in Europe compared with that of NATO.
Asked by
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
28 April 2011
Reference
727 c231
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what consideration they have given to including the Paralympics in the title of the London 2012 Olympic Truce resolution to be proposed to the United Nations General Assembly.

Asked by
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 March 2011
Reference
7018; 725 c321WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what discussions they have had with the United Nations Secretary-General about preparations for the London 2012 Olympic Truce.

Asked by
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 March 2011
Reference
7020; 725 c321WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what discussions they have had with the Commonwealth Secretary-General about observing the London 2012 Olympic Truce.

Asked by
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 March 2011
Reference
7022; 725 c322WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what discussions they have had with the NATO Secretary General about observing the London 2012 Olympic Truce.

Asked by
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 March 2011
Reference
7021; 725 c321WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what discussions they have had with the European Union High Representative about observing the London 2012 Olympic Truce.

Asked by
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 March 2011
Reference
7023; 725 c322WA
House
House of Lords