Skip to main content

1-20 of 162 results for subject:NHS

Answering member X
Lord Kamall

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More
Kamall, Lord (162)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords third reading. Bill passed.

Lead member
Baroness Merron
Answering member
Lord Kamall
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Debates on bills
Notes
Scottish and Welsh legislative consent granted, Northern Ireland legislative consent sought.
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc610-2
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Merron
Answering member
Lord Kamall; Earl Howe
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Debates on bills
Notes
Northern Ireland, Scottish and Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
23 February 2026
Reference
853 cc434-457
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage. Clauses 1 to 8 agreed to. Bill reported without amendment.

Lead member
Baroness Merron
Answering member
Lord Kamall; Earl Howe
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Notes
Northern Ireland, Scottish and Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
12 February 2026
Reference
853 cc367-409
House
House of Lords

Lords consideration of Commons amendments. Commons amendments 1 to 17 agreed to. Commons amendments 18 and 19 disagreed to and Lords amendments 19B and 19C in lieu agreed to. Commons amendments 20 and 21 agreed to. Bill returned to the Commons with amendments.

Lead member
Baroness Merron
Answering member
Lord Kamall
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Debates on bills
Date
24 November 2025
Reference
850 cc1105-1122
House
House of Lords

The Government are committed to providing high-quality end-of-life care, working closely with the NHS and other stakeholders. The Government are commissioning an independent review into the causes of disputes between those with parental responsibility and those responsible for the care or medical treatment of critically ill children such as Archie Battersbee. The requirement was specified in Section 177 of the Health and Care Act 2022 to lay a report before Parliament by 1 October 2023.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 September 2022
Reference
824 c272
House
House of Lords

I return the favour by thanking my noble friend for the meeting, but also for the frequent conversations we have had about mediation, for example. I know my noble friend is a qualified and experienced mediator. We are quite clear that the review has to attach no blame. We want to hear from as many people as possible. It will investigate the causes of disagreements in the cases of critically ill children between providers of care and persons with parental responsibility. It will look at whether and how these disagreements can be avoided, how we can sensitively handle their resolution, provide strong evidence and inform future recommendations to support end-of-life healthcare environments in the NHS. As much as possible, it will promote collaborative relationships between families, carers and healthcare. We can see it from both sides: as a parent, just put yourself in the shoes of someone who has to make these difficult decisions. Sometimes they feel that the medical profession

acts like God; on the other side, there are medical professionals who believe that the parents do not really understand all the details. Let us make sure that we get this right.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 September 2022
Reference
824 c272
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Finlay, for the conversations we have had since the passage of the Health and Care Bill. My officials have been incredibly appreciative of her bringing her expertise to this field and, in fact, for educating them—and me—on some of the sensitive issues that people have to deal with in these environments. We want the review to be as wide as possible; we do not want to cut it off; probably the only thing we want to avoid is blame. We want to do this in a sensitive way; we want to hear from the families; we want to make sure it is a balanced review, and we hope to take evidence for the review from as many people as have a view on this. That is why we are taking our time; we have to publish it by 1 October 2023.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 September 2022
Reference
824 c273
House
House of Lords

The noble and learned Baroness makes an incredibly important point about getting this right and getting the right balance. We know how difficult and sensitive these cases are when they have come to court. One issue that has been discussed by a number of parties is mediation: can we avoid it going to court in the first place, but also at what stage should mediation take place? It should not just be offered right at the end when everything has ended. We must make sure we really hear the voices of professionals as well as those affected, and families, to get the right balance. So far, we have relied heavily on the courts for some of these cases, sadly, but we just want to make sure we get this right.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 September 2022
Reference
824 c273
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness will be aware that earlier in the week, when we had the debate on integrated care boards and their responsibilities, we added—thanks to the work, once again, of the noble Baroness, Lady Finlay—palliative care services to the list of services that integrated care boards must commission. Integrated care boards will be accountable to NHS England, but also the CQC will be doing a lot of evaluation and they will be measured against the list of services that they have to commission. Clearly, there will have to be accountability on palliative care services.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 September 2022
Reference
824 c274
House
House of Lords

One thing that often happens at reviews is that we realise how complicated these issues are. One often cannot pinpoint one key issue, or one silver bullet, as it were. Therefore, quite often—and I was on a call on a different issue yesterday—we thought we had to tackle certain issues but realised there were wider systemic issues. Clearly, that is going to be the case here. NHS England’s palliative and end-of-life care programme is an all-age programme, but there are specific pieces of work focused on children and young people. We have also been working very sympathetically with charities such as Together for Short Lives. It has been commissioned to produce written guidance to provide ICBs and ICSs more detail, as the noble Baroness asked for, but also to make sure we make it a better environment and learn.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 September 2022
Reference
824 c274
House
House of Lords

I think many noble Lords will echo the sentiments of the noble Lord on that. That is why we want the review to be as wide-ranging as possible. People have suggested mediation, but should that be mandated or voluntary? There is also a difference between commercial mediation and family mediation. Commercial mediation is usually binding, whereas family mediation is not always binding. A further question is: at what stage do we offer mediation? One

thing we are being told is not to offer it when everything else has failed: we should offer it as soon as possible, to encourage a collaborative approach.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 September 2022
Reference
824 c274
House
House of Lords

Once again, I thank my noble friend for joining the meeting this week on this issue. It is quite clear that we want to hear from all voices. We encouraged the families to come forward. We have heard a number of cases, including some raised by noble Lords personally, who have been in contact with the families, and raised their concerns. Quite often they felt that their voices were not heard and they did not really understand the issues; they were in a very emotionally difficult time to take some of those issues in and understand the choices that were available. Sometimes they felt rushed into it by medical professionals. I think sometimes medical professionals have to show a bit of humility and not act like God.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 September 2022
Reference
824 c275
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the provision of end-of-life care by the NHS, particularly in respect of Archie Battersbee.

Asked by
Lord Balfe (Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
8 September 2022
Reference
824 cc272-5
House
House of Lords

To improve access to treatment, the Government have committed to spend over £8 billion from 2022 to 2025, and this in addition to the £2 billion elective recovery fund and £700 million targeted investment fund made available last year. This funding is increasing capacity through community diagnostic centres and surgical hubs, supporting hospitals to prioritise treating the patients waiting longest, as well as accessing capacity via the independent sector. We are also making it easier for patients to choose treatment at different providers with shorter waiting times.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 September 2022
Reference
824 c188
House
House of Lords

We are looking at a number of different things when it comes to doctors across the service. One is clearly opening new medical schools in areas which are underserved: sometimes we have doctors, but not in the right areas. We are also looking at overseas recruitment but, on the specific issues, we are having discussions—let us put it that way—on the cap. That is constantly being debated and I will take that back to the department.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 September 2022
Reference
824 c188
House
House of Lords

My noble friend raises a very important point. It is not just in my department; across government a number of different departments are looking at the impact of the cost of living crisis and higher energy bills. Clearly the NHS, but also individual practitioners and centres within the NHS, will be affected by rising costs. Discussions are going on at the moment. One of the things that my right honourable friend the incoming Secretary of State has said is that she is very clear on the priorities—ABCDD: ambulances, backlog, care, dentists and doctors—but also understands the energy crisis.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 September 2022
Reference
824 c189
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord raised a number of different points, which I will try to respond to. One issue is that, although we are recruiting more doctors, at the same time clearly there are doctors who are looking to leave. There is a demographic of people reaching a certain age, and one of the issues is pensions and whether they hit the limit. Those discussions are going on. There are also lots of discussions going on about how we can improve retention of those staff who feel overworked and have had enough.

In addition, at certain levels, for example primary care, it does not always have to be a doctor that the patient sees. It could be a practice nurse or a physiotherapist. There is also more emphasis on the Pharmacy First programme, whereby people can get advice from pharmacies, unless they actually need to see a doctor.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 September 2022
Reference
824 c189
House
House of Lords

If we look at elective care, we have seen a record number of referrals. We are also seeing more people receiving treatment. Of those on the waiting list, 16% are waiting for in-patient surgery. A lot of those on the waiting list are waiting for diagnostics. We have the surgical hubs and community diagnostic centres. On top of that, the two-year waiting list has been virtually eliminated, except difficult cases and those who need complex treatment. The next target is to eliminate the 18-month waiting list by 2023. It is a concerted effort right across the system, looking at a number of innovative solutions.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 September 2022
Reference
824 c189
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is absolutely right. There are a number of issues to do with social care. One of the reasons, frankly, is that it has been treated for far too long as a Cinderella service. One of the things we are doing is registration—there is a debate in the care community about whether it should be a voluntary or compulsory register; it is voluntary to start—to make sure that we really understand the sector. No one really has an overall picture of the care sector, and there is a range of different qualifications, which are quite often inconsistent. If we can get all that together, understand what is out there and understand the qualifications, we can make it a proper vocation and career for people. That is what we are doing at the moment.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 September 2022
Reference
824 c190
House
House of Lords

I am afraid I shall have to disagree. I ask noble Lords to think about what we have been doing with the Health and Care Act: for the first time, we are talking about properly integrating health and care together. They will be completely connected from the beginning of life and all the way through life. We also had the paper on integration and we are taking a number of different steps to make sure that social care is no longer the Cinderella service, but properly joined up all the way through people’s lives.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 September 2022
Reference
824 c190
House
House of Lords