Skip to main content

1-15 of 15 results for subject:Science

Answering member X
Lord Kamall

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

More
Kamall, Lord (15)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Lord Kamall on 6 July (HL Deb cols 1001–2) regarding the scientific evidence available regarding folic fortification, whether they will publish the science brief referred to by Lord Kamall referencing heliocentrism versus geocentrism.

Asked by
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 2022
Reference
HL1582
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what periodic review of literature they conduct in respect of the latest scientific evidence on foetal viability.

Asked by
Baroness Eaton (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 May 2022
Reference
HL247
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they made of any available scientific advice when implementing or removing COVID-19 restrictions in England.

Asked by
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
820 cc7-10
House
House of Lords

Throughout the pandemic, the Government’s approach has been informed by a wide range of scientific and medical advice and the latest data, as well as by economic, social and deliverability considerations. Ministers have always had regard to the scientific advice when taking decisions to implement or remove restrictions, but have balanced them against other considerations.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
820 c7
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for those questions and will try to answer them as best I can. We are now transitioning to a stage where we are able to live with Covid, and we have just announced our living with Covid strategy. At the same time, we are looking at the best way to help those who are particularly vulnerable medically or economically, who should still be entitled to free tests, for example, and issues such as affordability. We continue to monitor the new variants, the BA2 and the deltacron, and we will also continue to have the ONS surveys.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
820 c7
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for declaring an interest. We are reviewing all scientific advice and looking at the spread and potential of new variants. Advice has been given on an additional booster, particularly for those over 75. I will not ask the noble Lord his age, but I commit to write to him.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
820 c8
House
House of Lords

The Government have reflected on that and, in line with the public sector equality duty, have considered the impact of those decisions on the wider population but also on those who were previously classified as extremely vulnerable or clinically extremely vulnerable. For example, we are looking at whether it is appropriate to continue to give them free tests, and how they can get in touch with clinicians and others to ensure that they are more protected.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
820 c8
House
House of Lords

We constantly have meetings with the UKHSA and a number of different scientists join us for the calls when we have them, but we have always balanced things up. I shall give an example of a conversation I was having just before Christmas with some of the modellers. I asked them “What is your advice?”, and they said “Minister, before we give you the advice, you have to bear in mind that we are only considering the variant at the moment. It is for you to consider the wider medical balancing issues, and also the economic and social costs as well, and we recognise that you have to balance all those up.”

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
820 c8
House
House of Lords

I can see that that may well be a reasonable request, so why do I not discuss what is relevant and perhaps write to all noble Lords?

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
820 c9
House
House of Lords

It is interesting that, when I was talking to some of the modellers and scientists about this, they said that whenever they look at models of changes in behaviour, they count in or consider that there will be some uptick because of people relaxing measures. Even though we are moving from a position where it was legal to where it is guidance, they reckon that number in, but they still felt that it was not significant enough not to go forward with the change in strategy.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
820 c9
House
House of Lords

Well, there we are: there is a result already—please never accuse me of working too slowly. In that case, it is quite clear that there is a programme, and I shall find out more details.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
820 c9
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for reminding noble Lords that the virus has not gone away. That is one of the reasons why we laid out the Living with Covid-19 strategy. The UKHSA, the Office for National Statistics, and a number of academics, will continue to monitor it. Noble Lords who have read all the articles during the pandemic will be aware of how many scientists are also producing data. We continue to monitor all that data and balance it up when making decisions. We are also prepared to stand up rapidly should there be any variants of concern.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
820 c9
House
House of Lords

If I was aware of any scientific advice that had not yet been published, I am not sure whether I would be unaware of it. I will try to find out. The Government have laid out the terms of the inquiry; only last week I sent the link to some people, which I am very happy to send to the noble Viscount, for the points that should be considered by the inquiry. During the pandemic, and even now, we continue to receive a wide range of scientific advice. The wonderful thing about scientists is that they continue to debate with and contest each other. Some say that we should never have had these measures, some that we lifted them too early, and some that you can never get the timing right, whatever you do.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
820 c10
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for making that point. It is incredibly important, not only within the medical community, where we were asked, for example, to lift some restrictions so that we could start tackling the backlog. We were asked ‘by mental health experts to ensure that people were getting access to mental health care who had been unable to because of the pandemic. We have also balanced this against economic and social considerations—sometimes these things affect each other. Being unable to work and facing uncertainty can be one of the most destabilising things and can affect people’s mental health. My noble friend is right that we have had to balance a number of issues in the round.

Answered by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
820 c10
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to take note of the first report from the Science and Technology Committee on Ageing: Science, Technology and Healthy Living. (HL 183). Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Patel
Answering member
Lord Kamall
Department
Science and Technology Committee (HL); Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Date
20 October 2021
Reference
815 cc59-108GC
House
House of Lords