Skip to main content

1-20 of 31 results for subject:Asylum

Answering member X
Lord McNally

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

More
McNally, Lord (31)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many cases relating to (1) housing, (2) asylum, or (3) domestic abuse, were funded by civil legal aid and assessed as having “borderline” prospects of success in (a) 2008–09, (b) 2009–10, (c) 2010–11, (d) 2011–12, and (e) 2012–13; and in what proportion of those...

Asked by
Baroness O'Loan (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 June 2013
Reference
HL213; 745 cc217-8WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many hearings of the second tier immigration tribunal have been cancelled on the grounds that (1) interpreters failed to attend, or (2) interpreters attending did not speak the correct language, since Applied Language Solutions began operating as the Ministry of Justice's sole contractor for...

Asked by
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 June 2013
Reference
HL71; 745 cc135-6WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to improve access to legal representation for asylum seekers whose (1) applications and (2) appeals have been refused.[HL6078]

Asked by
Lord Roberts of Llandudno (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
744 cc127-8WA; HL6078
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is their assessment of the impact on the provision of free and reliable legal advice on immigration and refugee issues of the entry into administration of the Immigration Advisory Service, the winding up of Refugee and Migrant Justice, and the cuts in legal aid.

Asked by
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 2011
Reference
11059; 729 c325WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will give priority to families with children, in particular those with children born in the United Kingdom, when extending legal advice to migrants and asylum applicants, especially those facing deportation.

Asked by
Lord Hylton (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
10029; 728 c384-5WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord McNally on 26 October 2010 (WA 274-75), how many of the 64 providers in breach of the fixed fee margin key performance indicator for their asylum work in 2009-10 were awarded asylum contracts in the 2010 civil bid...

Asked by
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 June 2011
Reference
9655; 728 c215WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what plans they have to propose amendments (a) to the European Convention on Human Rights in the light of recent judgments against the United Kingdom, and (b) to other international treaties governing human rights and political asylum.

Asked by
Lord Laird (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 November 2010
Reference
3488; 722 c145WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to draft data disclosed by the Legal Services Commission to Refugee and Migrant Justice showing the number of asylum and immigration suppliers working in breach of the fixed fee margin key performance indicator, what was the Commission’s total payment, excluding disbursements, for all graduated...

Asked by
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
2571; 721 c274-5WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government , further to draft data disclosed by the Legal Services Commission to Refugee and Migrant Justice showing the number of asylum and immigration suppliers working in breach of the fixed fee margin key performance indicator, what was the total payment, excluding disbursements, for asylum cases...

Asked by
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
2570; 721 c274-5WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to draft data disclosed by the Legal Services Commission to Refugee and Migrant Justice showing the number of asylum and immigration suppliers working in breach of the fixed fee margin key performance indicator for the financial year 2009–10, what was the total number of...

Asked by
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
2574; 721 c274-5WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is their estimate of the cost to public funds of the closure of Refugee and Migrant Justice.

Asked by
Lord Jones of Cheltenham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 July 2010
Reference
927; 720 c74WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to ensure that migrants have access to justice following the closure of Refugee and Migrant Justice.

Asked by
Lord Jones of Cheltenham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 July 2010
Reference
926; 720 c74WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the ability of other providers of legal services to absorb the caseload of Refugee and Migrant Justice.

Asked by
Lord Hylton (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
879; 720 c60-1WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government how the former clients of Refugee and Migrant Justice will receive continuity of legal advice and representation.

Asked by
Lord Hylton (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
878; 720 c60WA
House
House of Lords
My Lords, if the description "competent and efficient" was correct for RMJ, one asks how it managed to get itself into administration. It represents 7 per cent of cases, so organisations representing 93 per cent are coping. Again, it was a difficult decision to make and I know that there have been complaints about the tough system of paying. However, we are dealing with taxpayers’ money and there is justification for ensuring that the organisations provide value for it. It may be worth noting that, in the round of bids, double the number of law firms are bidding for this business. That suggests that RMJ is not alone and that companies believe that they can deliver the service under the present scheme.
Answered by
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1507
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I will take the last point first. Yes, there is bound to be a certain amount of disruption if an organisation that covers 7 per cent of cases goes into administration. However, I can assure the House that the Government are giving high priority to minimise that disruption. On whether other non-profit-making practitioners are facing difficulty, it is true that there have been complaints about the change in funding and fees, which was made by the previous Administration with an eye to saving taxpayers’ money. The change is not popular but, as my right honourable friend the Lord Chancellor said in another place, the organisations are coping. Trying to balance the good work that these organisations are doing against the taxpayers’ not-bottomless pot is difficult.
Answered by
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1506
House
House of Lords
There are no estimates on that. There will be an extra cost, but Ministers had to face a balance of judgment: did they take into account that RMJ was going into administration and that therefore there would be knock-on costs, or did they give it more taxpayers’ money with no guarantee that it would not again find itself in difficulty in a short time? It was a hard call but, as the noble Lord knows full well, sometimes Ministers have to make hard calls.
Answered by
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1506-7
House
House of Lords
Again, dealing with the last point first, I am not even sure whether that is under review, but I certainly cannot give an answer. On the matter of money owing, a case from RMJ will be heard on Wednesday, so I am not sure how much I can comment on it, other than to say that it is the view of the Government and the LSC that no moneys are owing to RMJ. Indeed, when the books are finally balanced, it may prove to be the other way around.
Answered by
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1507-8
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the UK Border Agency has been asked to treat RMJ clients with common sense and to allow time during this period of adjustment. Therefore, according to my briefing, the right reverend Prelate’s first assertion is not true.
Answered by
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1507
House
House of Lords
My Lords, since this Question was tabled, Refugee and Migrant Justice has been placed into administration. The Government’s immediate concern was that the clients of RMJ should continue to receive a good-quality service.
Answered by
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1506
House
House of Lords