Skip to main content

1-20 of 35 results for subject:Devolution

Answering member X
Jim Murphy

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

More
Murphy, Jim (35)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how many meetings (a) he, (b) his predecessors and (c) other Ministers in his Department had with Scottish Executive Ministers in each month since May 2007.

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
506 c1348-9W; 320375
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what recent discussions he has had with Ministerial colleagues on the recommendations of the final report of the Commission on Scottish Devolution; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
David Amess (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 November 2009
Reference
501 c135W; 300136
House
House of Commons
The commission's report is the work of months of research and evidence and is based on the support of the Scottish Parliament. The process is supported by the Labour party, the Conservative party and the Liberal Democrats. Only one party stands outside the consensus, and unfortunately the Scottish National party Government continue to boycott the entire process.
Answered by
Jim Murphy (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 November 2009
Reference
501 c522
House
House of Commons
I have had many discussions with Cabinet colleagues during preparation for the Government's proposals for the future of Scotland within the United Kingdom, and with your permission, Mr. Speaker, I will make a statement on that this afternoon.
Answered by
Jim Murphy (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 November 2009
Reference
501 c522
House
House of Commons
What discussions he intends to have with ministerial colleagues on the recommendations of the Commission on Scottish Devolution.
Asked by
Lindsay Roy (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
25 November 2009
Reference
501 c522; 300134
House
House of Commons
I met the First Minister most recently on 16 September.
Answered by
Jim Murphy (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
497 c281
House
House of Commons
It is of course important that we change the system of expenses in the House of Commons. The Prime Minister has been very clear about that, and he is now in the process of doing it. As the Prime Minister has also made clear, there is a process that we are now going through. If Legg has requested that repayments be made, whether to comply is up to individual Members, but that is certainly the inclination of the majority of Members of this House.
Answered by
Jim Murphy (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
497 c281
House
House of Commons
I have nothing further to add to what the Foreign Secretary offered in a very long and detailed statement yesterday. The fact is that this was 100 per cent. the responsibility of the Scottish Government—it was 100 per cent. their decision and their responsibility—and they made their decision on their merits. However, I think that the issue was very badly mishandled and those scenes in Tripoli were a national disgrace. The St. Andrew's flag was trailed out on to the tarmac to celebrate that man's return; that image will haunt Scotland across the world. Some damage was done to Scotland's reputation, although I do not wish to overstate it. It is now the responsibility of all of us to work together to rebuild Scotland's reputation across the world.
Answered by
Jim Murphy (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
497 c283
House
House of Commons
It is clear that that is a real blow to the city of Glasgow, but that city has never given up on itself and, regardless of the Scottish Government's decision, it will not do so now. I will be meeting the leader of Glasgow city council later this afternoon, when I will go with him to the Olympic site. I will have the opportunity to discuss these very issues with him then.
Answered by
Jim Murphy (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
497 c282
House
House of Commons
I am delighted that the hon. Gentleman and myself, as well as others, had the opportunity to meet over the summer recess to discuss the important proposals in respect of Calman. We simply believe that Scotland is bigger and stronger because it is part of the United Kingdom, but the devolution settlement does have to be modernised. The Calman commission proposals are substantial. I want to maintain consensus and momentum, and we will respond before the end of this year on details of the Calman proposals.
Answered by
Jim Murphy (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
497 c282
House
House of Commons
During the year that I have been Secretary of State I have tried to strike a different tone in Scottish politics. The public expect politicians to agree where possible; I have tried to uphold that and I will continue to do so despite invitations to the contrary. Of course the Lockerbie and al-Megrahi issue was badly handled. The decision to visit al-Megrahi in prison was a mistake, but ultimately it was a mistake that the Scottish Government were entitled to make. It is a decision that is entirely, 100 per cent., their responsibility; they have the constitutional responsibility to take that decision.
Answered by
Jim Murphy (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
497 c281
House
House of Commons
I am stumped for an answer. Because of the many solutions for dealing with the remarkable economic crisis that Scotland and the United Kingdom faces, I am not yet convinced that a meeting of the Scottish Grand Committee is the silver bullet. My hon. Friend the Member for Lanark and Hamilton, East (Mr. Hood) will continue to make the case, however, and if that meeting does take place, I can think of no better Chair of the proceedings than him.
Answered by
Jim Murphy (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
497 c281-2
House
House of Commons
I have asked the First Minister to have a public debate with me. The First Minister is, of course, not everyone's idea of an athlete, but he has certainly tried to run away from these debates in Scotland in recent weeks. I do not know if he can run, but I do know that he cannot hide and that this debate will have to take place at some point over the next few weeks.
Answered by
Jim Murphy (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
497 c281
House
House of Commons
The Foreign Secretary made a statement yesterday and I have nothing further to add to it. I was here for his statement—not all hon. Members were.
Answered by
Jim Murphy (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
497 c282-3
House
House of Commons
What recent discussions he has had with the First Minister on the relationship between the Scottish Executive and the UK Government under the devolution settlement.
Asked by
Nicholas Winterton (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
497 c281; 292280
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what recent assessment he has made of the work of the Commission on Scottish Devolution on the relative powers of members of the UK and Scottish Parliaments.

Asked by
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 June 2009
Reference
494 c280W; 279152
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what recent discussions he has had with the Advocate-General on devolution issues.

Asked by
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 June 2009
Reference
494 c280W; 279150
House
House of Commons
I have regular discussions with my right hon. Friend the Chancellor. Sir Kenneth Calman's commission on Scottish devolution is supported by business and trade union leaders, and by the Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties.
Answered by
Jim Murphy (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2009
Reference
489 c897
House
House of Commons
The Scottish Government have more money than ever before. The current Scottish Government have more than double the budget that the late Donald Dewar had when he was First Minister. I think it important for politicians in all parties in Scotland to find additional ways in which to work together through the recession. We are in it together, and we will get out of it together. I appeal again to the Scottish National party to stop putting its obsession with the constitution before the priorities of our country, which are to do with economic recovery. Scotland will never forgive any political party that puts its interests before those of our country.
Answered by
Jim Murphy (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2009
Reference
489 c897
House
House of Commons
My right hon. Friend campaigns tirelessly for the people and businesses of Lanarkshire, which has a proud industrial heritage, not least in mining and of course the steelworks. The people of Lanarkshire have shown their determination and resolution to rise from previous recessions. Working with him and other fellow Members, and businesses and trade unions, we are determined to do everything possible to make sure that Lanarkshire is not the epicentre of this recession in Scotland.
Answered by
Jim Murphy (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2009
Reference
489 c897-8
House
House of Commons