Skip to main content

1-20 of 30 results for subject:Devolution

Answering member X
Lord Newby

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

More
Newby, Lord (30)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords second reading and remaining stages. Motion to regret amendment disagreed to on division (213 votes to 312). Second reading motion agreed to on question. Committee negatived. Queen's consent signified. Third reading. Amendment to the motion disagreed to on division (101 votes to 466). Third reading agreed to on question....

Lead member
Lord True; Baroness Evans of Bowes Park
Answering member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town; Lord Newby
Department
Cabinet Office; Lord Privy Seal
Type
Debates on bills
Date
30 December 2020
Reference
808 cc1805-1927
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what progress has been made in considering the proposals for fiscal devolution set out in the London Finance Commission’s report Raising the Capital.

Asked by
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
9 July 2014
Reference
755 cc211-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government have recently devolved a range of responsibilities and funding through the Localism Act 2011 and they have decentralised local government finance through the Local Government Finance Act 2012. Any further fiscal devolution to sub-national authorities in England would represent a significant change to the existing tax landscape, with potentially significant legal, economic and constitutional implications.

Answered by
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 July 2014
Reference
755 c211
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the first point that the noble Lord makes is summed up very well in the introduction to the report to which his Question refers, in which Tony Travers, who chaired it, says:

“Devolution and localism face little opposition apart from national politicians’ cautious approach to constitutional change in Britain”.

That sums up the position very well, and I think that there has been considerable movement under this Government. I will take back the noble Lord’s second point to my colleagues in the Treasury.

Answered by
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 July 2014
Reference
755 c212
House
House of Lords

I am afraid that there has been a very chequered history of attempts to devolve power—within England, at least. This Government, by devolving half the income generated by business rates, have begun a process. The growth deals announced at the beginning of this week—under which, over a period, £12 billion will be devolved to local enterprise partnerships, whereas it would otherwise have been administered by central government departments—is a big move towards greater devolution. I suspect that in the next Parliament there will be much more pressure to do more.

Answered by
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 July 2014
Reference
755 c212
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the principle that operates if one is devolving tax revenue to a lower tier of government is that the amount of tax devolved is subtracted from the amount of grant which that tier of government would otherwise be getting. Therefore, at the start of the process at least, there is no net shift of revenue from one area to another.

Answered by
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 July 2014
Reference
755 c212
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there are obviously strong arguments which would enable cities to raise more funding. Those have been resisted by the Treasury under successive Governments. As they are moving towards drawing up their manifestos, I am sure that all the parties are considering whether they want to change those long-standing practices.

Answered by
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 July 2014
Reference
755 c213
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was waiting for the last part of that sentence. I am sure that all noble Lords will bear the noble Lord’s expertise in mind, should a commission be established. I think that, once we have the outcome of the Scottish referendum, all parties and all people who are interested in constitutional change in the UK will want to revisit the issue. The exact way we do it is also something that I think all the parties are thinking about as they draw up their manifestos.

Answered by
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 July 2014
Reference
755 c213
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am always pleased when the Labour Party rethinks its policies. However, the premise of the point that the noble Lord raised was misguided. This Government, through the city deals, has devolved significant funding to the major cities for the first time. As I said earlier, with the growth deals which we announced at the beginning of this week, £12 billion is being devolved to the LEPs from what were central government allocations. This is a very big shift of economic and social decision-making going down to the cities and regions.

Answered by
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 July 2014
Reference
755 c213
House
House of Lords

Lords question for short debate on what plans they have to review the Barnett Formula in the light of the Local Government Association’s recommendation that it be replaced with a new needs-based funding model.

Lead member
Lord Shipley
Answering member
Lord Newby
Department
Treasury
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
17 December 2013
Reference
750 cc286-304GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the joint ministerial working group on rebalancing the Northern Ireland economy has concluded its discussions on the potential devolution of corporation tax and reported its findings to the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister is committed to meeting the First Minister and Deputy First Minister on 26 March to discuss these findings.

Answered by
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2013
Reference
744 c411
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that account has been taken of views expressed from many quarters. However, the complication, as the noble Lord will be aware, is that if the Northern Ireland Assembly were to cut the rate of corporation tax significantly, its own budget would have to be cut by an equivalent amount.

Answered by
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2013
Reference
744 c411
House
House of Lords

I am not absolutely sure what the noble Lord is asking me to confirm because no decision has yet been taken on corporation tax and Northern Ireland. The Government are sympathetic to much of what has been said on the Silk report and are now in discussion, as he is aware, with the Government in Wales.

Answered by
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2013
Reference
744 c412
House
House of Lords

My Lords, a number of measures were announced in the Autumn Statement aimed at rebalancing, or rather promoting, the Northern Ireland economy, including another £132 million of capital expenditure, science and technology funding for the research partnership at Queen’s University and the slightly earlier decision to give the Northern Ireland Assembly decision-making powers over air passenger duty on long-haul flights.

Answered by
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2013
Reference
744 c412
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that is something that we will confirm once we have a final decision in Northern Ireland.

Answered by
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2013
Reference
744 c412
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that is the reason why this has become such a big issue in Northern Ireland. The same considerations do not apply elsewhere in the United Kingdom, although I remind the House that the differential between the rate of corporation tax in Northern Ireland and the rate in the Republic of Ireland is now significantly less than it was when this Government came into office.

Answered by
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2013
Reference
744 c412
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that is one of the issues which obviously has to be considered as part of this overall discussion. As the House knows, the Government take artificial tax avoidance schemes extremely seriously.

Answered by
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2013
Reference
744 c412
House
House of Lords

No, my Lords. Sadly—from the noble Lord’s point of view—we will not be supporting the noble Lord’s proposals, not least because, taking just the VAT proposal on its own, it would cost about £12 billion. I am not sure where he suggests we should get that money from.

Answered by
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2013
Reference
744 c413
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it would not really be at the discretion of the First Minister of Scotland because the Azores criteria mean that if there is a differential cut of tax the region or nation that bears that cut has to take the full fiscal consequences of doing so. I do not have the figure on the cost of such a cut to Scotland. However, bear in mind that the estimate of such a change in Northern Ireland is that there will be a cut in its grant of between £300 million and £400 million. I think that the noble Lord can possibly scale that up for Scotland.

Answered by
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 2013
Reference
744 c413
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the answer by Lord Newby on 15 October 2012 (HL Deb, col. 1251) and the Written Answer by Lord Sassoon on 6 December 2012 (WA 187), when they plan to announce whether or not corporation tax is to be devolved to the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Asked by
Lord Lexden (Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 2013
Reference
744 cc411-3
House
House of Lords