Skip to main content

1-20 of 93 results for subject:"Climate change"

Answering member X
Ian Pearson

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

More
Pearson, Ian (93)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what assessment his Department has made of its capacity to adapt to climate change; and what plans he has to publish a climate change adaptation strategy.

Asked by
Peter Ainsworth (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 January 2009
Reference
486 c447-8W;486 c448W; 241182
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the Natural Environment Research Council's programme quantifying and understanding the earth system in informing the Government's climate change policy.

Asked by
Dai Davies (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 December 2007
Reference
167820; 468 c1448-9W;468 c1447-8W
House
House of Commons
The EU emissions trading scheme is a key part of our emissions reductions strategy. The scheme’s next phase will provide business with greater certainty, and we expect the scheme to deliver additional savings of 29.3 million tonnes of CO2 each year.
Answered by
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c1507
House
House of Commons
The Commission has already taken a robust approach to the phase 2 national allocation plans—NAPs—of member states, and I have no doubt that it will continue to do so. It is vital that we ensure scarcity in the market, and that is what will happen in phase 2. My hon. Friend is also right to point out the importance of the potential for linking the EU emissions trading scheme to other trading schemes that are being discussed in other countries. Certainly, the review of the directive that is taking place—in which we are fully participating—will allow that possibility. I want to see the growth of a global carbon market in the future, because that will be good for the world in limiting CO2 emissions. Carbon trading offers significant potential for low-cost carbon abatement.
Answered by
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c1507-8
House
House of Commons
As a Government, we do not seek to set a particular carbon price—in a market mechanism, it is the market’s role to establish that. The Government’s role is to ensure sufficient scarcity and that the market functions properly. The benefit of a cap and trade scheme is that setting a cap gives a certainty that carbon dioxide emissions are being controlled. The EU emissions trading scheme is a significant policy instrument because it covers about half of all Europe’s CO2 emissions. We want to make sure that it works even more effectively in the future.
Answered by
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c1508
House
House of Commons
Certainly, the UK is starting from a low base when it comes to renewables, and no one is under any illusion—the 20 per cent. target agreed across Europe is extremely challenging for the UK and for all EU member states. We will have to look at the division of responsibilities that will determine the target to be set for the UK, but I emphasise that the measures on renewables in the energy White Paper envisage a significant growth in that sector over the next 10 years.
Answered by
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c1508
House
House of Commons
What assessment he has made of the likely effect of the UK’s membership of the EU emissions trading scheme on future emissions of greenhouse gases.
Asked by
Adrian Bailey (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
461 c1507; 144189
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what discussions he has had with his counterpart in the Welsh Assembly Government on extending the climate change champions young ambassadors scheme to Wales.

Asked by
Dai Davies (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Notes
Columns in printed daily part are numbered two columns ahead of columns on Hansard Online. Column numbers on PIMS refer to Hansard Online
Date
15 June 2007
Reference
141620; 461 c1361W
House
House of Commons

Adjournment debate on carbon dioxide reduction target.

Lead member
Colin Challen
Answering member
Ian Pearson
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
12 June 2007
Reference
461 c721-40
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in what joint projects his Department is involved with its Chinese counterpart in the area of climate change mitigation and sustainable development.

Asked by
Denis MacShane (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 May 2007
Reference
138506; 460 c1407W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what contribution United Kingdom officials or scientists made to the ad hoc working group on Mitigation potentials of policies, measures and technologies of the Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention of Climate Change, held in...

Asked by
Dai Davies (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 May 2007
Reference
138434; 460 c1406W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what progress he is making in involving (a) G8 countries, (b) EU countries and (c) other major developing countries in talks on tackling the effects of climate change.

Asked by
Anne Moffat (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 May 2007
Reference
137649; 460 c1406-7W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps his Department is taking to communicate to the public (a) the causes of climate change, (b) the impact on the United Kingdom and the wider world of climate change and (c) the possible solutions to climate...

Asked by
Nicholas Brown (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 May 2007
Reference
135658; 460 c966W
House
House of Commons
I agree that aviation is the fastest growing source of carbon dioxide emissions, but it is not just a question of carbon dioxide emissions. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimates that the non-carbon dioxide impact of aviation is two to four times as great as the carbon dioxide impact. That is why the Government have been leading the way in bringing aviation into the EU emissions trading scheme, and why we strongly back the proposals that have emerged from the European Commission, which by 2020 could save 183 million tonnes of carbon dioxide per year.
Answered by
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 May 2007
Reference
460 c726-7
House
House of Commons
My hon. Friend is right about the importance of aviation to the UK economy and he gives a good example of the growth and success of Manchester airport. As a Government, we must have a sustainable policy on aviation. We should not be against aviation any more than we are against the cement industry, aggregates, construction, telecommunications or chemicals. Clearly it is important that aviation, like other sectors of the economy, takes responsibility for reducing its carbon emissions, which is why putting aviation in the EU emissions trading scheme is the best way forward. We have been responding to the European Commission’s proposals on aviation and we hope to see significant progress later this year, in accordance with the timetable laid out by the Commission.
Answered by
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 May 2007
Reference
460 c727
House
House of Commons
Domestic aviation is included in the UK’s greenhouse gas inventory. International aviation and shipping are not because there is no international agreement on definitions. There is scope to amend the Climate Change Bill to allow the introduction of aviation and shipping, but we need international agreement on reducing carbon dioxide emissions from aviation and shipping. In the meantime, putting aviation into the EU ETS—the UK would support the inclusion of shipping—has to be the next best step. If we can achieve agreement through the International Civil Aviation Organisation to get global action on aviation, that would be much the best for everyone.
Answered by
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 May 2007
Reference
460 c727-8
House
House of Commons
I accept that air passenger duty may not be the most effective policy instrument when it comes to influencing environmental behaviour, but it is one of the best we have. It is certainly far better than the Tory proposal to impose VAT on domestic flights. The simple fact is that the rise in APD announced in the last pre-Budget report will produce more carbon savings in a month than the Conservative proposals will in a year.
Answered by
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 May 2007
Reference
460 c727
House
House of Commons
It is incredible that Opposition Members oppose the climate change levy, which will have more of an impact in a week in terms of reducing carbon emissions than the current Conservative proposal to put VAT on domestic aviation would do in a year, while opposing the increase in air passenger duty, which will save 2.75 million tonnes of carbon dioxide a year by 2010-11—more in one month than putting VAT on domestic flights, as the original question suggests, will do in a year. This is a nonsense of a Conservative policy—
Answered by
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 May 2007
Reference
460 c728
House
House of Commons
We shall have plenty of opportunities to discuss climate change in the future, particularly in relation to the Climate Change Bill. I welcome the hon. Gentleman to the Dispatch Box and congratulate him on his debut performance; it is just a shame that his task is to defend the Opposition’s shabby policy on aviation—
Answered by
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 May 2007
Reference
460 c728-9
House
House of Commons
The best way available in which to tackle the climate-change impact of aviation is to bring it within the EU emissions trading scheme. However, we continue to explore and discuss the use of other economic instruments, within Government, with stakeholders and with other countries. I agree that aviation is the fastest growing source of carbon dioxide emissions, but it is not just a question of carbon dioxide emissions. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimates that the non-carbon dioxide impact of aviation is two to four times as great as the carbon dioxide impact. That is why the Government have been leading the way in bringing aviation into the EU emissions trading scheme, and why we strongly back the proposals that have emerged from the European Commission, which by 2020 could save 183 million tonnes of carbon dioxide per year.
Answered by
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 May 2007
Reference
460 c726
House
House of Commons