Skip to main content

1-20 of 68 results for subject:Protection

Answering member X
Lord Sainsbury of Turville

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

More
Sainsbury of Turville, Lord (68)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

SI 2006/246. Lords debate on motion to revoke. Disagreed to on division (77 to 79).

Lead member
Lord Hunt of Wirral
Answering member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
3 May 2006
Reference
681 c533-46
House
House of Lords
My Lords, it is difficult for the Government to get into the position of trying to specify all the terms under which money is lent because that is likely to stifle competition and consumer choice. Our concern is to make certain that there is real transparency and we have brought in regulations to do that. Noble Lords will also be aware that the Competition Commission inquiry into store cards has put forward some ideas about action that might be taken including an APR warning notice, where APR exceeds a specified threshold, but that is just one of their initial suggestions.
Answered by
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 December 2005
Reference
676 c1247-8
House
House of Lords
My Lords, we continue to have regular meetings on these issues. We produced a series of regulations covering these issues last year and we are now considering the Consumer Credit Bill which deals with these issues. A great deal of discussion is going on about them.
Answered by
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 December 2005
Reference
676 c1249
House
House of Lords
My Lords, it is generally accepted that the basis of competition should be that consumers have a clear idea of the actual products they are buying. Transparency is therefore key to this.
Answered by
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 December 2005
Reference
676 c1248
House
House of Lords
My Lords, specifying that documents have to be printed in a particular size print is probably over-regulation. After all, if print is very small, there are technical means, such as glasses and magnifying glasses, that can deal with it.
Answered by
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 December 2005
Reference
676 c1248
House
House of Lords
My Lords, we covered this in Committee. I hope that we made it clear that if we were to specify every kind of unfair relationship it would not be future-proof and it not would capture the next areas of unfair relationships. Therefore, a broad definition is a much better way to approach this matter.
Answered by
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 December 2005
Reference
676 c1249
House
House of Lords
My Lords, it would be difficult to ascertain exactly what that level would be on a universal basis. Getting into that level of detail is exactly where regulation tends to go wrong.
Answered by
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 December 2005
Reference
676 c1248
House
House of Lords
My Lords, it is important that lenders behave responsibly when lending. Action has been taken to make certain that that happens. APACS is looking at ways to ensure that lenders adhere to the banking code and its best practice guidelines stop lenders lending to vulnerable people by sharing data and so on. That seems to be the way that we should deal with this issue, rather than trying to specify all the details on lending, because once one does that, one has to specify everything. If one hole is stopped up by, say, putting a cap on interest, it simply leads to action in other areas and that would not only stifle competition but would also lead to incredible bureaucracy.
Answered by
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 December 2005
Reference
676 c1248-9
House
House of Lords
My Lords, as I pointed out, the Consumer Credit (Disclosure of Information) Regulations 2004 set out in great detail what should be included in agreements.
Answered by
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 December 2005
Reference
676 c1248
House
House of Lords
My Lords, there are no plans to include any provisions in the Consumer Credit Bill that would address the specific issue raised by the noble Baroness. However, in 2004, regulations came into force that require lenders to give consumers clear information about the key features of credit products, including the way in which interest is treated. The Consumer Credit Bill will also improve consumers’ rights by giving them more effective options to challenge unfairness in credit relationships, and to resolve disputes with lenders. It will also improve the powers of the Office of Fair Trading to take action against lenders who exploit or harm consumers.
Answered by
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 December 2005
Reference
676 c1247
House
House of Lords
Whether they intend to include provision in the Consumer Credit Bill to prevent store card providers charging interest on the full statement value from the date of first purchase, in circumstances where the card-holder has already paid off most of the balance.
Asked by
Baroness Greengross (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
14 December 2005
Reference
676 c1247
House
House of Lords

What steps they are taking to ensure that United Kingdom consumers are aware of their rights in the single European market, in terms of purchase and credit contracts.

Asked by
Lord Dykes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 November 2005
Reference
1909; 675 c20-1WA
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to take note of the report of the European Union Committee on Completing the Internal Market in Services (HL 23 2005-06). Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Woolmer of Leeds
Answering member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville
Department
Department of Trade and Industry; European Union Committee
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Date
14 October 2005
Reference
674 c497-522
House
House of Lords

Whether they propose to implement the recommendation of the Hampton review of regulatory inspection and enforcement concerning the move of the Office of Fair Trading’s consumer functions to a new consumer and standards regulator.

Asked by
Lord Taylor of Warwick (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
1446; 673 c282WA
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on unstarred question on what steps Her Majesty's Government are taking to protect intellectual property rights for the creative industries.

Lead member
Baroness Buscombe
Answering member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
22 June 2005
Reference
672 c1687-99
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on Queens speech (second day) on industry and economic affairs.

Lead member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Answering member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville
Department
Department of Trade and Industry; Treasury
Type
Queen's speech debates
Date
18 May 2005
Reference
672 c26-108
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 March 2005
Reference
671 c1-2
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 March 2005
Reference
671 c1-2
House
House of Lords
What steps they are taking to curb the activities of companies which make unsolicited telephone calls to householders with the intention of inducing them to ring premium rate phone lines to claim non-existent prizes.
Asked by
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
21 March 2005
Reference
671 c1-2
House
House of Lords

Whether they plan to take action to ensure that retailers who take deposits from customers are obliged to arrange fidelity insurance or similar protection to cover the consequences of insolvency of the retailer before delivery of the goods [Hl 432].

Asked by
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 February 2005
Reference
669 c139WA
House
House of Lords