Search Results

1-20 of 102 results for subject:Visas

Show detailed: On Off

Results: 10 20 50 100

Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if information given to an entry clearance officer during an informal assessment of a visitor's visa application is retained and used in a later fresh application by the same applicant.

Asked by

Brian H Donohoe (Labour)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

11 May 2001

Reference

368 c451W; 160682

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if he will make a statement on the nature of the reduction in the amount of paperwork required from applicants for entry clearance at Islamabad.

Asked by

John Bercow (Conservative)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

11 May 2001

Reference

368 c451W;368 c452W; 160843

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, pursuant to his Answer of 30th March 2001 at 365 c797W, on entry clearance, for what reason a backlog of replies to honourable Members' letters on entry clearance cases accumulated; and what has been the reduction in waiting times...

Asked by

John Bercow (Conservative)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

11 May 2001

Reference

368 c450W;368 c451W; 158335

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what procedures are in place for an applicant to challenge the contents of an entry clearance officer's notes taken during an informal assessment of the prospects of the award of a visitor visa on the grounds of the applicant's...

Asked by

Brian H Donohoe (Labour)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

11 May 2001

Reference

368 c451W;368 c451-2W; 160697

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, how many family visit visa applications were (a) received, (b) determined, (c) allowed and (d) refused by (i) the largest 100 entry clearance posts and (ii) all entry clearance posts in the first quarter of 2001. - Inc table...

Asked by

Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

1 May 2001

For answer on

10 May 2001

Answered on

10 May 2001

Mr. Simon Hughes: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many family visit visa applications were (a) received, (b) determined, (c) allowed and (d) refused by (i) the largest 100 entry clearance posts and (ii) all entry clearance posts in the first quarter of 2001. [160462] Mr. Vaz: [holding answer 8 May 2001]: (i) Our latest information from the 100 largest entry clearance posts which submit monthly statistical data is shown in the table. (ii) the remaining 64 posts submit information on an annual basis. To answer this question for all 164 posts we would have to ask the annual reporting posts to provide the information requested. This could be done only at disproportionate cost. Family visit visa applications 2001--top 100 posts _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Applications received Applications determined January February March January February March 1. Abidjan 19 29 16 20 22 19 2. Abu Dhabi 24 34 34 23 35 34 3. Abuja {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- 4. Accra 753 1,694 1,857 685 782 1,962 5. Addis Ababa 31 12 15 39 11 15 6. Almaly 36 13 20 37 13 20 7. Amman 426 85 58 0 85 58 8. Amsterdam 38 34 34 38 34 34 9. Ankara 29 38 19 29 38 19 10. Bahrain 16 10 2 16 10 2 11. Baku 19 9 8 19 9 8 12. Bandar Seri Begawan {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- 13. Bangkok 80 173 361 73 154 277 14. Banjul 38 34 49 40 31 32 15. Beirut 92 62 82 89 62 78 16. Belgrade 258 391 320 4 352 290 17. Bogota 33 33 47 33 33 47 18. Bombay 619 1,070 1,787 619 1,070 1,791 19. Bratislava 50 122 184 50 118 171 20. Brussels 14 10 35 4 7 22 21. Bucharest 58 85 109 59 90 110 22. Budapest 6 7 5 6 7 5 23. Cairo 137 145 146 129 142 143 24. Calcutta 94 118 222 97 120 225 25. Canberra 7 15 15 7 16 15 26. Casablanca 117 119 115 110 116 115 27. Chicago 141 176 200 119 162 190 28. Colombo 70 74 161 70 74 49 29. Copenhagen 44 36 42 44 36 39 30. Damascus 0 0 15 0 0 15 31. Dar Es Salaam 107 104 191 107 104 191 32. Dhaka 451 490 502 348 415 437 33. Doha 49 31 24 49 31 24 34. Dubai 71 79 75 75 81 51 35. Dublin 36 21 20 36 18 18 36. Dusseldorf 106 272 383 100 246 332 37. Ekalerinburg 11 16 24 11 16 24 38. Geneva 25 74 63 21 67 61 39. Georgetown 33 74 63 33 25 61 40. Guangzhou 121 143 {1}-- 90 91 {1}-- 41. Hanoi 4 3 5 4 3 4 42. Harare 0 1 {1}-- 0 1 {1}-- 43. Havana 3 0 0 3 0 0 44. Hong Kong 32 34 40 32 37 5 45. Islamabad 2,326 2,225 3,411 1,512 1,120 2,864 46. Istanbul 430 453 227 485 522 231 47. Jakarta 36 58 62 37 56 61 48. Jedda 0 0 0 0 0 0 49. Jerusalem 5 9 13 5 29 13 50. Kampala 116 102 156 120 84 142 51. Karachi 575 420 495 460 82 495 52. Kathmandu 0 1 0 0 0 0 53. Khartoum 44 15 45 15 16 49 54. Kiev 83 {1}-- {1}-- 20 {1}-- {1}-- 55. Kingston 52 68 130 46 70 132 56. Kuala Lumpur 14 12 20 13 13 20 57. Kuwait 200 43 28 200 43 28 58. Lagos 1,147 1,193 1,718 901 1,293 1,509 59. Lima 12 27 29 12 30 29 60. Los Angeles 0 216 320 0 216 320 61. Luanda 8 2 14 8 2 3 62. Lusaka 0 55 65 0 19 65 63. Madras 217 229 490 233 226 544 64. Madrid 26 37 26 26 37 26 65. Manila 0 129 {1}-- 0 129 {1}-- 66. Minsk 0 14 20 0 14 18 67. Moscow 237 214 286 228 191 268 68. Muscat 75 39 65 72 39 65 69. Nairobi 156 164 203 156 164 203 70. New Delhi 913 1,153 1,335 907 1,129 1,244 71. New York 533 558 650 511 549 635 72. Nicosia 0 {1}-- {1}-- 0 {1}-- {1}-- 73. Oslo 30 44 92 27 42 89 74. Ottawa 475 278 364 442 185 255 75. Paris 286 253 296 0 248 328 76. Peking 109 63 288 94 51 288 77. Port Louis 80 136 275 80 136 275 78. Port of Spain 5 0 20 5 0 20 79. Prague 0 0 0 0 0 0 80. Pretoria 27 25 9 20 13 11 81. Quito 24 14 17 24 14 16 82. Riga 11 6 {1}-- 11 12 {1}-- 83. Riyadh 8 15 {1}-- 12 20 {1}-- 84. Rome 63 90 99 61 80 92 85. Sana'a 20 13 12 20 10 11 86. Sarajevo 61 119 159 61 119 159 87. Shanghai 10 30 116 10 30 116 88. Singapore 21 26 39 24 25 37 89. Sofia 89 118 120 74 117 114 90. St. Petersburg 0 0 65 0 0 65 91. Sto Domingo 6 0 0 6 0 0 92. Stockholm 89 103 105 129 123 116 93. Taipei 0 0 0 0 0 0 94. Tashkent 13 5 13 13 5 13 95. Tbilisi 0 0 0 0 0 0 96. Tehran 0 0 {1}-- 0 0 0 97. Tirana 21 21 15 15 23 15 98. Tokyo 5 5 11 5 4 12 99. Tunis 97 92 105 87 70 105 100. Valletta {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- Total 13,053 14,862 19,376 10,555 12,164 18,094 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. {1} Information not yet received from posts _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Applications issued Applications refused January February March January February March 1. Abidjan 19 21 18 1 1 1 2. Abu Dhabi 17 29 32 6 6 2 3. Abuja {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- 4. Accra 277 757 1,060 408 25 902 5. Addis Ababa 14 6 10 25 5 5 6. Almaly 37 13 20 0 0 0 7. Amman 0 84 57 0 1 1 8. Amsterdam 32 30 32 6 4 2 9. Ankara 28 38 17 1 0 2 10. Bahrain 16 10 0 0 0 2 11. Baku 18 9 7 1 0 1 12. Bandar Seri Begawan {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- 13. Bangkok 45 131 253 28 23 24 14. Banjul 32 20 20 8 11 12 15. Beirut 87 61 77 2 1 1 16. Belgrade 0 347 289 4 5 1 17. Bogota 25 29 46 8 4 1 18. Bombay 454 874 1,419 165 196 372 19. Bratislava 47 115 171 3 3 0 20. Brussels 3 5 22 1 2 0 21. Bucharest 48 82 102 11 8 8 22. Budapest 5 7 4 1 0 1 23. Cairo 113 124 132 16 18 11 24. Calcutta 95 116 224 2 4 1 25. Canberra 4 13 15 3 3 0 26. Casablanca 105 114 106 5 2 9 27. Chicago 119 162 190 0 0 0 28. Colombo 32 48 0 38 26 49 29. Copenhagen 44 36 39 0 0 0 30. Damascus 0 0 11 0 0 4 31. Dar Es Salaam 93 83 172 14 21 19 32. Dhaka 203 227 234 145 188 203 33. Doha 46 31 21 3 0 3 34. Dubai 47 47 33 28 34 18 35. Dublin 34 16 17 2 2 1 36. Dusseldorf 94 241 332 6 5 0 37. Ekalerinburg 11 16 24 0 0 0 38. Geneva 20 66 57 1 1 4 39. Georgetown 28 20 57 5 5 4 40. Guangzhou 84 85 {1}-- 6 6 {1}-- 41. Hanoi 2 1 1 2 2 3 42. Harare 0 0 {1}-- 0 1 {1}-- 43. Havana 3 0 0 0 0 0 44. Hong Kong 27 32 3 5 5 2 45. Islamabad 1,112 1,059 1,664 400 61 1,200 46. Istanbul 424 451 207 61 71 24 47. Jakarta 33 50 49 4 6 12 48. Jedda 0 0 0 0 0 0 49. Jerusalem 5 9 13 0 20 0 50. Kampala 100 59 114 20 25 28 51. Karachi 397 19 345 63 63 150 52. Kathmandu 0 0 0 0 0 0 53. Khartoum 5 6 45 10 10 4 54. Kiev {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- 20 {1}-- {1}-- 55. Kingston 35 59 118 11 11 14 56. Kuala Lumpur 10 11 12 3 2 8 57. Kuwait 196 39 23 4 4 5 58. Lagos 688 1,143 1,316 213 150 193 59. Lima 8 26 28 4 4 1 60. Los Angeles 0 216 318 0 0 2 61. Luanda 8 1 3 0 1 0 62. Lusaka 0 7 58 0 12 7 63. Madras 216 211 511 17 15 33 64. Madrid 26 37 26 0 0 0 65. Manila 0 59 {1}-- 0 70 {1}-- 66. Minsk 0 13 18 0 1 0 67. Moscow 223 190 261 5 1 7 68. Muscat 68 36 63 4 3 2 69. Nairobi 132 141 167 24 23 36 70. New Delhi 573 682 777 334 447 467 71. New York 500 547 633 11 2 2 72. Nicosia 0 {1}-- {1}-- 0 {1}-- {1}-- 73. Oslo 27 41 89 0 1 0 74. Ottawa 442 184 252 0 1 3 75. Paris 0 246 325 0 2 3 76. Peking 88 40 238 6 11 50 77. Port Louis 73 126 263 7 10 12 78. Port of Spain 5 0 20 0 0 0 79. Prague 0 0 0 0 0 0 80. Pretoria 16 11 7 4 2 4 81. Quito 20 14 16 4 0 0 82. Riga 11 6 {1}-- 0 6 {1}-- 83. Riyadh 9 9 {1}-- 3 11 {1}-- 84. Rome 60 77 91 1 3 1 85. Sana'a 8 1 6 12 9 5 86. Sarajevo 61 117 158 0 2 1 87. Shanghai 8 23 107 2 7 9 88. Singapore 18 25 37 6 0 0 89. Sofia 71 113 114 3 4 0 90. St. Petersburg 0 0 61 0 0 4 91. Sto Domingo 5 0 0 1 0 0 92. Stockholm 128 121 116 1 2 0 93. Taipei 0 0 0 0 0 0 94. Tashkent 12 4 11 1 1 2 95. Tbilisi 0 0 0 0 0 0 96. Tehran 0 0 {1}-- 0 0 {1}-- 97. Tirana 15 20 15 0 3 0 98. Tokyo 4 2 11 1 2 1 99. Tunis 60 70 84 27 21 21 100. Valletta {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- Total 8,308 10,467 14,114 2,247 1,718 3,980 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. {1} Information not yet received from posts

Date

10 May 2001

Reference

368 c348-54W;368 c348-53W; 160462

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, further to his Answer of 10th April, 366 c529W, on entry clearance, what proportion of the cases in which he intervened pertain to families of individuals known to him personally; and if he will make a statement. - Ref...

Asked by

John Bercow (Conservative)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

10 May 2001

Reference

158811; 368 c344W

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, for how long on average a person who applied for entry clearance for settlement in (a) June 2000, (b) July 2000, (c) August 2000, (d) September 2000, (e) October 2000, (f) November 2000, (g) December 2000, (h) January 2001,...

Asked by

Baroness King of Bow (Labour)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

27 April 2001

For answer on

10 May 2001

Answered on

10 May 2001

Ms Oona King: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs for how long on average a person who applied for entry clearance for settlement in (a) June 2000, (b) July 2000, (c) August 2000, (d) September 2000, (e) October 2000, (f) November 2000, (g) December 2000, (h) January 2001, (i) February 2001 and (j) March 2001 will have to wait for an interview in each queue at each post in the Indian sub-continent. [160093] Mr. Vaz: The statistics are as follows: Waiting times in weeks for settlement applications _________________________________________________________________________________________________. 2000 2001 Post/Queue June July August September October November December January February March Bombay Q1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q2 6 5 4 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 Q3 6 5 4 4 4 6 6 6 8 6 Q4 6 5 4 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 New Delhi Q1 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 Q2 12 12 13 16 15 10 10 15 15 12 Q3 12 12 13 16 15 10 10 15 15 12 Q4 12 12 13 16 15 10 10 15 15 12 Dhaka Q1 20 22 22 18 16 14 14 12 14 16 Q2 28 30 28 28 26 24 21 20 22 24 Q3 20 22 22 18 16 14 14 12 12 16 Q4 44 44 42 44 40 36 35 35 34 38 Islamabad Q1 5 5 4 5 3.5 3 4 0 7 5 Q2 20.5 19 19 18.5 18 18 17 0 15 13 Q3 29 27 25.5 24 22 22 20 0 18 16 Q4 36 36 33 31 31 29 28 0 25 23 Calcutta{1} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Colombo{1} 10 8 8 7 10 0 0 5 5 4 Karachi{1} 3 7 9 8 10 12 11 12 8 5 Madras{1} 8 6 7 5 3 7 7 6 7 7 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. {1} Calcutta, Colombo, Karachi and Madras operate as a single settlement queue Notes: Q1--Right of abode cases and Dependant Relatives over 65 Q2--Spouses and Children under 18 Q3--Fiance(e)s and other First Time Applicants Q4--Re-applicants

Date

10 May 2001

Reference

368 c344-6W; 160093

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if he will provide a breakdown, by entry clearance post, of the number of family visit visa refusals in relation to which (a) an appeal was received, (b) a refusal was overturned by an entry clearance manager after receipt...

Asked by

Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

10 May 2001

Reference

368 c348W; 160463;160461

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, pursuant to his Answer of 30th March, Official Report, column 797W, on entry clearance, how many of the cases involving entry clearance were investigated by the Minister for Europe; in how many cases the Department's judgment was overturned; in...

Asked by

John Bercow (Conservative)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

27 April 2001

Reference

158333; 367 c420W

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, pursuant to his Answer of 30th March 2001, 365 c797W, on entry clearance, by what means waiting times were reduced; what change in entry denial rates routes occurred; and if he will make a statement. - Inc table.

Asked by

John Bercow (Conservative)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

9 April 2001

For answer on

27 April 2001

Answered on

27 April 2001

Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, pursuant to his answer of 30 March 2001, Official Report, column 797W, on entry clearance, by what means waiting times were reduced; what change in entry denial rates routes occurred; and if he will make a statement. [158334] Mr. Vaz: Waiting times for interview in Islamabad were reduced by the posting of additional staff; by the appointment of a new management team; by a reduction in the amount of documentation required from applicants; by the implementation of new procedures recommended by external and internal review teams; and by hard work by the staff at Post. I am very pleased with the efforts made by the staff. The improvement in waiting times is shown in the following table. _________________________________________________________________________________________________. December 1999 December 2000 March 2001 Visit Visas Tier 3 5 days 40 days {1}0 Settlement Visas Q1 9 weeks 5 weeks 5 weeks Q2 39 weeks 18.5 weeks 13 weeks Q3 44 weeks 24 weeks 16 weeks Q4 50 weeks 31 weeks 23 weeks _________________________________________________________________________________________________. {1} Same day service Notes: Tier 3--Visit visa applications requiring in-depth interview (target: 10 days) Queue 1--Right of abode cases and Dependant Relatives over 65 (target: 13 weeks) Queue 2--Spouses and Children under 18 (target: 13 weeks) Queue 3--Fiance(e)s and Other First Time Applicants (target: 26 weeks) Queue 4--Re-applicants (target: 39 weeks) Refusal rates in Islamabad, as a percentage of the total number of non-settlement and settlement applications received, have been as follows: Percentage _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Non-settlement Settlement 1998 15 16 1999 21.4 25.5 2000 11 20.6 _________________________________________________________________________________________________.

Date

27 April 2001

Reference

158334; 367 c420-1W

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, how many applications for entry visas made in India have been (a) granted and (b) refused in the last 12 months. - Includes figures.

Asked by

Tom Cox (Labour)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

27 April 2001

Reference

158520; 367 c421W

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, how many applications for entry visas made in Pakistan have been (a) granted and (b) refused in the last 12 months. - Includes figures.

Asked by

Tom Cox (Labour)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

27 April 2001

Reference

158388; 367 c421W

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if he will provide a breakdown, by entry clearance post, of the number of family visit visa applications (a) received, (b) determined, (c) allowed and (d) refused in March; if he will provide a breakdown, by entry clearance post,...

Asked by

Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

23 April 2001

Reference

367 c122W; 157971;157972

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, pursuant to the Answer for the honourable Member for Bury St. Edmunds, of 22nd March 2001, 365 c317W, on visas, how many of the cases in which the Minister for Europe intervened related to (a) his constituency and (b)...

Asked by

John Bercow (Conservative)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

10 April 2001

Reference

366 c529W; 156356

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, on how many occasions (a) he and (b) the Minister for Europe has replied personally to representations by honourable Members concerning refusals of visa applications lodged in (i) Islamabad, (ii) Delhi and (iii) Bombay since 1999. - Inc fact...

Asked by

Lord Risby (Conservative)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

10 April 2001

Reference

156529; 366 c529-30W;366 c529W

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if he will list, in respect of each visa application approved, following initial refusal by the Minister for Europe, (a) the name of the honourable Member in whose constituency the applicant's sponsor lived, (b) the grounds stated in the...

Asked by

Lord Risby (Conservative)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

3 April 2001

Reference

156527; 366 c134-5W;366 c134W

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which honourable Members have made representations to the Minister for Europe regarding visa refusals; and how many of these refusals have been overturned. - Ref to 22 March 2001, 365 c316-7W. (Holding answer 30 March 2001).

Asked by

Lord Risby (Conservative)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

3 April 2001

Reference

156199; 366 c135W;366 c134W

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if he will review the effectiveness of the work of entry clearance officers, with particular reference to the refusal of visa applications. - (Holding answer 2 April 2001).

Asked by

Lord Risby (Conservative)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

3 April 2001

Reference

156528; 366 c134W

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if (a) he, (b) the Permanent Under Secretary and (c) the Director for the Public Departments was notified (i) orally and (ii) in writing about the Minister for Europe's decisions to reverse visa refusals. - (Holding answer 2 April...

Asked by

Lord Risby (Conservative)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

3 April 2001

Reference

156530; 366 c134W;366 c133-4W

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, how many visa applications the Minister for Europe (a) reviewed and (b) overturned since he took office. (Notice originally given for Monday 9th April); how many visa applications were (a) received and (b) overturned by ministers responsible for entry...

Asked by

Lord Risby (Conservative)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

2 April 2001

Reference

366 c54W; 156105;156126

House

House of Commons

Librarians' tools

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher