Skip to main content

1-13 of 13 results for subject:Surrey

Year X
1992

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

What has been the contribution of the TECs covering Surrey in helping those out of work. (Failed OPQ).

Asked by
Ian Taylor (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Employment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 December 1992
Reference
215 c174W
House
House of Commons
Type
Unprinted papers
Date
25 August 1992
House
House of Commons

To comment on the outcome of the recent planning inquiry appeal, under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and the Planning and Compensation Act 1991, in regard to land use at Tillingdown Farm, Caterham.

Asked by
Llew Smith (Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 July 1992
Reference
211 c385-6W;211 c383W
House
House of Commons

For what reasons it has been decided to carry out the review of local government boundaries in Surrey at a different time from its neighbours.

Asked by
David Wilshire (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 June 1992
Reference
210 c93W
House
House of Commons

If it remains his policy that the part of Surrey between the M25 and the old Greater London boundary should remain part of Surrey not London.

Asked by
Ian Taylor (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 June 1992
Reference
209 c25W
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord McLoughlin (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 1992
Reference
205 c635
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord McLoughlin (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 March 1992
Reference
205 c635
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on impact of M25 noise & lighting.
Asked by
Ian Taylor (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Transport
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 March 1992
Reference
205 c635
House
House of Commons
Whether the proposed improvements to traffic flows on the M25 in Surrey will take account of environmental considerations.
Asked by
Ian Taylor (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Transport
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
9 March 1992
Reference
205 c635
House
House of Commons

Table showing details of no. of gipsy caravans for each of last 10 years in Surrey, Woking & Guildford. DOE. 1992.

Deposited by
Department of the Environment
Type
Deposited papers
Date
24 February 1992
Reference
Dep 7855
House
House of Commons

What assessment DES has made of the methodology adopted by Surrey County Council for forecasting future demand for primary school places carried out for their current age of transfer reorganisation proposals; what are Department's guidelines on the methodology to be used. - Includes ref to DES circular 3/87 Providing for...

Asked by
Ian Taylor (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Education and Science
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 February 1992
Reference
204 c170W
House
House of Commons

How many gipsy caravans were shown as being in the County of Surrey in each of the twice-yearly counts carried out for his Department by local authorities in each of the past 10 years; and how many of these were in the Boroughs of Woking and Guildford, respectively. - Information...

Asked by
Lord Onslow of Woking (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 February 1992
Reference
204 c65W;204 c64W
House
House of Commons

What were the number of recorded incidents per uniformed police officer in (a) the Metropolitan police area, (b) Surrey and (c) the Northumbria police authority area in 1991. - Includes figures.

Asked by
Jim Cousins (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 February 1992
Reference
203 c162W
House
House of Commons