Search Results

1-20 of 109 results for subject:Surveillance

Show detailed: On Off

Results: 10 20 50 100

Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what timescale he has set to fit all Type 23 frigates with stern sonar; when he proposes to place an order for the Type 2087 sonar for the Royal Navy; for what reason he has put back to December 2004 the in...

Asked by

Lord Davies of Stamford (Conservative)

Answering body

Ministry of Defence

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

20 December 2000

Reference

360 c184W; 143348;143336;143337

House

House of Commons

Home Office

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he will make a statement on the policing of the recent Pensioners' Rally at Central Hall, Westminster, with particular reference to the (a) clothing worn by the police and (b) use of surveillance cameras. - Inc figure.

Asked by

Steve Webb (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Home Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

19 December 2000

Reference

360 c127W; 143159

House

House of Commons

Home Office

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he will call for a report from the Chief Constable of Sussex on the policing of the pensioners' meeting held at Hove on 24th September and subsequent march to the Labour Party Conference, with particular reference to (a) the...

Asked by

Steve Webb (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Home Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

19 December 2000

Reference

360 c127W; 143158

House

House of Commons

Home Office

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what plans he has to amend the provisions of the Prisoners Act 1952 relating to the opening and examination of letters to and from prisoners to search for enclosures.

Asked by

Lord Fearn (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Home Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

19 December 2000

Reference

360 c126W; 143152

House

House of Commons

Ministry of Defence

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what capabilities the Royal Navy's SSNs have for connectivity in the littoral environment; what equipment they have for improving connectivity in littoral zones; when DERA's and Thomson Marconi Sonar's RTOF Buoy will be available to the Royal Navy; and if he will...

Asked by

Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Ministry of Defence

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

30 November 2000

Reference

357 c717W; 139653

House

House of Commons

Ministry of Defence

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what plans he has for separate programmes for the Royal Navy's UAV to support its new carrier battle groups and the RAF's UAV to supply ISTAR over extended ranges to the Future Offensive Air Capability; and if he will make a statement;...

Asked by

Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Ministry of Defence

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

17 November 2000

For answer on

29 November 2000

Answered on

29 November 2000

Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) what plans he has for separate programmes for the Royal Navy's UAV to support its new carrier battle groups and the RAF's UAV to supply ISTAR over extended ranges to the Future Offensive Air Capability; and if he will make a statement; [139724] (2) if he will make a statement on plans for the RAF's and RN's joint force UAV; what is the cost of the programme in relation to the overall cost of the single UAV capability, Watchkeeper, including BAE Systems' Phoenix UAV; and if he will make a statement. [139706] Dr. Moonie: The defence requirement is for a balanced, robust and layered Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance (ISTAR) capability that meets the information needs of all operation commanders and supports their decisions on force protection and targeting of weapons systems. The requirement for a future ISTAR UAV system to support commanders in the land and littoral battlespace is known as Watchkeeper. We are considering arrangements for disseminating the information we would derive from Watchkeeper, some of which, for example on targeting, may be of value to maritime task forces operating at sea. At present, we do not plan to procure a maritime version of Watchkeeper although work is continuing to determine whether a maritime UAV would be a cost-effective solution to meeting part of the maritime ISTAR requirement. Also, we have no plans to procure a UAV to provide an independent ISTAR capability for the Future Offensive Air System (FOAS), although it is possible that an element of FOAS would be an unmanned combat air vehicle. The ISTAR requirements of maritime task forces and deep strike weapons systems will be met within the framework of our future overall ISTAR capability. Part of the current assessment phase for Watchkeeper includes studying whether the existing Phoenix UAV system should form part of the solution of the requirement.

Date

29 November 2000

Reference

357 c639-40W;357 c638-9W; 139724;139706

House

House of Commons

Ministry of Defence

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what ISTAR capabilities are operational for the short range UAVs, Spectator (Formation) and Sender (Battle Group) in the Watchkeeper programme; what is the estimated cost and the timetable for development and production of the short range UAVs; and if he will make...

Asked by

Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Ministry of Defence

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

29 November 2000

Reference

357 c644W;357 c639W; 140710

House

House of Commons

Ministry of Defence;Defence Procurement Agency

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what current ISTAR capability and UAVs are available; what Smart Procurement guidelines have been set for the UAV acquisition project; and if he will make a statement. - Inc text of letter from Robert Walmsley of Defence Procurement Agency.

Asked by

Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Ministry of Defence

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

16 November 2000

For answer on

28 November 2000

Answered on

28 November 2000

Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what current ISTAR capability and UAVs are available; what Smart Procurement guidelines have been set for the UAV acquisition project; and if he will make a statement. [139654] Dr. Moonie: This is a matter for the Chief Executive if the Defence Procurement Agency. I have asked the Chief Executive to write to the hon. Member. Letter from Robert Walmsley to Mr. Mike Hancock, dated 28 November 2000: I am replying to your question to the Secretary of State for Defence on the current Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance (ISTAR) capability and the Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV) acquisition project. This matter falls within my area of responsibility as Chief of Defence Procurement and Chief Executive of the Defence Procurement Agency. The current ISTAR capability contributes in both the imaging and electronic analysis areas using a range of platforms across the three environments. These include the long range aircraft such as the SENTRY E-3D, tactical reconnaissance aircraft such as the Jaguar and the Royal Navy's Sea Harrier, and land-based systems such as the recently introduced ODETTE electronic support system. In the future, the Airborne Stand-Off Radar (ASTOR) platform with its synthetic aperture radar and moving target indicator capability as well as improved tactical reconnaissance systems and enhanced land and maritime electronic analysis systems, will be introduced into service. The PHOENIX system is currently the only UAV asset within the ISTAR inventory. Originally developed as a Target Acquisition and Surveillance system, PHOENIX has now completed two operational tours where it has been used as part of the overall requirements for ISTAR. Within the context of Smart Acquisition guidelines and to optimise the overall requirements for a future ISTAR capability, a series of studies is in place aimed at identifying the most effective mix of both manned and unmanned assets. With regard to UAVs, the WATCHKEEPER project, as a part of this overall investment analysis, is seeking to establish the most cost-effective whole-life solutions and the optimum balance of investment in new, existing assets or a combination of the two. The UAV programme is being managed by an Integrated Project Team (IPT) bringing together the main stakeholders who have an interest in the ISTAR assets and the products they deliver. Industry has been involved from an early stage in an open and constructive relationship and has assisted in the development of the emerging requirements.

Date

28 November 2000

Reference

357 c492-3W; 139654

House

House of Commons

Scotland Act 1998 (Modifications of Schedule 5) Order 2000;Scotland Act 1998 (Cross-Border Public Authorities) (Adaptation of Functions etc) (No 2) Order 2000;Scotland Act 1998 (Transfer of Functions to the Scottish Ministers etc) (No 2) Order 2000

Draft SIs on the Scotland Act 1998 (Transfer of Functions to the Scottish Ministers etc) (No 2), (Cross-Border Public Authorities) (Adaptation of Functions etc) (No 2) and (Modifications of Schedule 5). Lords debate on and motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member

Baroness Ramsay of Cartvale

Answering member

Earl of Northesk

Department

Scotland Office

Type

Debates on delegated legislation

Date

24 November 2000

Reference

619 c1067-76

House

House of Lords

Ministry of Defence;Defence Procurement Agency

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what guidelines have been set for the Future Scout and Cavalry System and Tactical reconnaissance Armoured Combat Equipment Requirement; what ISTAR capabilities TRACER and FSCS will employ; and if he will make a statement. - Text of letter from Robert Walmsley of...

Asked by

Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Ministry of Defence

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

14 November 2000

For answer on

22 November 2000

Answered on

22 November 2000

Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what guidelines have been set for the future Scout and Cavalry system and tactical reconnaissance armoured combat equipment requirement; what ISTAR capabilities TRACER and FSCS will employ; and if he will make a statement. [138976] Dr. Moonie: This is a matter for the Chief Executive of the Defence Procurement Agency. I have asked the Chief Executive to write to the hon. Member. Letter from Robert Walmsley to Mr. Mike Hancock, dated 22 November 2000: I am replying to your question to the Secretary of State for Defence on the collaborative Future Scout and Cavalry System and Tactical Reconnaissance Armoured Combat Equipment Requirement (TRACER) programme. This matter falls within my area of responsibility as Chief of Defence Procurement and Chief Executive of the Defence Procurement Agency. You asked what guidelines have been set for the programme. In approving the programme, Minister (Defence Procurement) directed that the work on TRACER should be part of an integrated strategy of studies which would include work to determine the role that Unmanned Air Vehicles would play in battlefield reconnaissance. Balance of Investment studies will inform a decision on the optimum mix of sensors and platforms to meet the land commander's critical information requirements. On the question of what ISTAR capabilities will be employed, TRACER/FSCS will form the land-based component of the wider Information, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance (ISTAR) assets. To meet commanders' requirements for detailed combat intelligence, these systems will need to be capable of gathering, processing and disseminating accurate and timely information. Of primary importance will be information on the enemy strength, deployment and equipment. To provide a complete and detailed picture of the battlefield Commanders will also require data on terrain, navigability, obstacles and routes. In the context of TRACER, two competing consortia are considering a wide range of candidate technologies. These include surveillance systems, a sophisticated sensor suite, a balanced survivability package including stealth technology, an improved target detection and recognition capability, Defensive Aids Suites and physical protection in the form of advanced armour technologies. A decision on the final system architecture will take account of the outcome of the current Project Definition phase, due to complete in July 2002, and the parallel studies into the use of Unmanned Air Vehicles for battlefield reconnaissance.

Date

22 November 2000

Reference

357 c190-1W; 138976

House

House of Commons

Scotland Act 1998 (Cross-Border Public Authorities) (Adaptation of Functions etc) (No 2) Order 2000;Scotland Act 1998 (Transfer of Functions to the Scottish Ministers etc) (No 2) Order 2000;Scotland Act 1998 (Modifications of Schedule 5) Order 2000

Draft SIs on the Scotland Act 1998 (cross-border public authorities), (transfer of functions to the Scottish ministers) and (modifications of schedule 5). Considered by Standing Committee. Agreed to on question.

Lead member

Brian Wilson

Department

Scotland Office

Type

Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings

Date

21 November 2000

Reference

2nd SC on DL

House

House of Commons

Ministry of Defence

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what initiatives his Department outlined at the university of Lancaster for a range of new equipment capabilities designed to improve the SSN's operational effectiveness in littoral zones; what initiatives were laid out for a network-centric concept of operations; and if he will...

Asked by

Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Ministry of Defence

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

14 November 2000

For answer on

20 November 2000

Answered on

20 November 2000

Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) what initiatives his Department outlined at the university of Lancaster for a range of new equipment capabilities designed to improve the SSN's operational effectiveness in littoral zones; what initiatives were laid out for a network-centric concept of operations; and if he will make a statement; [138982] (2) what plans the Royal Navy Submarine Service has for improved connectivity and advanced intelligence, surveillance, targeting, and reconnaissance capabilities to change the contribution of nuclear attack submarine to future joint operations; and if he will make a statement. [138978] Mr. Spellar: At the Submarine Centennial Conference (27-29 September 2000), the Ministry of Defence's Equipment Capability Customer organisation outlined the research programme to inform new equipment capabilities that will improve our ship, submarine and aircraft operational effectiveness, in support of littoral operations contributing towards a more joint defence capability. Rear Admiral Rob Stevens, Flag Officer Submarines, and members of his staff, also addressed the conference. The research programme includes work relevant to operations in littoral zones: hull-mounted sonar arrays; communications technologies; Recoverable Tethered Optical Fibre buoys; and mine detection and avoidance. We are also conducting research related to a network-centric concept of operations, and to improve connectivity and advanced intelligence, surveillance, targeting and reconnaissance capabilities. The aim is to integrate underwater assets fully with wider maritime, air and land forces. There is a large programme of research and development work under way specific to the underwater battlespace. Some highlights include research into multistatics, allowing ships, submarines and maritime aircraft to exploit each other's sensors; remote sensor active acoustics; long-range acoustic communications; remotely deployed sensor systems; static sensors and Underwater Unmanned Vehicles. These technologies have wide military utility, and commercial applications, which are also developing rapidly, will be taken into account.

Date

20 November 2000

Reference

357 c5-6W; 138982;138978

House

House of Commons

Ministry of Defence

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will make a statement about British unmanned aerial vehicles lost in the Balkans theatre since March 1998.

Asked by

Julian Lewis (Conservative)

Answering body

Ministry of Defence

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

13 November 2000

Reference

356 c456W; 137906

House

House of Commons

Lawful business practice regulations response to consultation. Includes regulatory impact assessment. DTI. 2000.

Type

Impact assessments

Date

6 November 2000

Reference

DTI

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment he has made of the consequences of Article 7 of the draft European Charter of Fundamental Rights for (a) the media and (b) surveillance of criminals.

Asked by

John Bercow (Conservative)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

2 November 2000

Reference

355 c608-9W; 134793

House

House of Commons

Bassam of Brighton, Lord

What arrangements have been made for the appointment of members of the tribunal to be set up under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000. [HL 4469].

Asked by

Lord Desai (Labour)

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

1 November 2000

Reference

HL 4469; 618 c107WA

House

House of Lords

Ministry of Defence

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will make a statement on the monitoring of British military communications during the Kosovo campaign by (a) Serb forces and (b) the Kosovo Liberation Army.

Asked by

Julian Lewis (Conservative)

Answering body

Ministry of Defence

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

30 October 2000

Reference

355 c277W; 134916

House

House of Commons

Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Notification of Authorisations etc) Order 2000;Investigatory Powers Tribunal Rules 2000

SI 2000/2563 and SI 2000/2665. Considered by Standing Committee. Agreed to on question.

Lead member

Charles Clarke

Department

Home Office

Type

Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings

Date

30 October 2000

Reference

1st SC on DL

House

House of Commons

Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Notification of Authorisations Etc) Order 2000;Investigatory Powers Tribunal Rules 2000

Draft SI on regulation of investigatory powers (notification of authorisation etc). Lords debate on motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member

Lord Bassam of Brighton

Answering member

Earl of Northesk

Department

Home Office

Type

Debates on delegated legislation

Date

27 October 2000

Reference

618 c645-8

House

House of Lords

Regulatory impact assessment for the Telecommunications (Lawful Business Practice) (Interception of Communications) Regulations 2000. DTI. 2000.

Type

Impact assessments

Date

17 October 2000

Reference

DTI

Librarians' tools

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher