1-4 of 4 results for subject:Microprocessors
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.187 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Microprocessors
- We searched for
- subject_t:Microprocessors OR subject_t:"Computer chips" OR subject_t:Microchips OR subject_t:"Silicon chips" OR subject_ses:92008
Type
House
Session
Month
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
Further to the Written Answer by Lord Sainsbury of Turville on 14 July 2003, 651 c86WA, (a) why their response in June to the Science and Technology Committee's report Chips for Everything: Britain's opportunities in a key global market relied on the Information Age Partnership in rejecting the report's key...
Further to the Written Answer by Lord Sainsbury of Turville on 14 July 2003, 651 c86WA, (a) why their response in June to the Science and Technology Committee's report Chips for Everything: Britain's opportunities in a key global market relied on the Information Age Partnership in rejecting the report's key...
Whether they have consulted the Information Age Partnership about the recommendations in the Science and Technology Committees December 2002 report 'Chips for Everything: Britains opportunities in a key global market', and if so, when they did so and what practical actions have resulted. [HL 3732].
Whether they have consulted the Information Age Partnership about the recommendations in the Science and Technology Committees December 2002 report 'Chips for Everything: Britains opportunities in a key global market', and if so, when they did so and what practical actions have resulted. [HL 3732].
Lords debate on motion to take note of the report of the Science and Technology Committee on Chips for Everything: Britain's opportunities in a key global market. (HL 13 2002/03). Agreed to on question.
Lords debate on motion to take note of the report of the Science and Technology Committee on Chips for Everything: Britain's opportunities in a key global market. (HL 13 2002/03). Agreed to on question.